Predictive Significance Sample Clauses

Predictive Significance. Aside from having a role in determining meaning, Xxxxxxx argues that intentions can also have predictive significance, as “determinants of the likely consequences of the proposed course of action”113. He argues that this significance is valid114, but is derivative and does not give intention a foundational role. This appears to be correct; a clear intention might not only more reliably cause outcomes as part of the current proposal or plan, intentions might also make future decision making of the same type more likely. Intentions would be seen as good predictors, increasing the chance of success of current plans, and involved in building habits that influence future behavior. It is noteworthy that some have sought to interpret DER as being founded on this kind of consequential significance. In terms of this chapter, the line of argument is that intention does and can have the kind of moral significance 113 Xxxxxxx, Moral Dimensions: Permissibility, Meaning, Blame. p87. 114 Ibid. p30. that DER requires, a moral relevance for permissibility that Xxxxxxx denies. In this section on predictive significance, I consider one form of significance that Xxxxxxx accepts, and that I agree is non-foundational, but that others understand to be at the heart of the distinction between intention and foresight. I will consider whether this kind of consequential understanding of the significance of intention could function as a basis for DER’s intention condition. This is interesting territory, since DER is widely understood as an archetypally non-consequentialist approach, and the predictive significance of intention may open up the way for an interpretation of DER that has a consequentialist character. Consequentialists could view intentionally causing effects differently to causing those same effects unintentionally, or accidentally. These effects will be magnified and have more impact on the future, for better or worse, than causing effects unintentionally or as a merely foreseen side effect. Consequentialism, then, could offer an account of intentions in which they carry a special moral significance, but this predictive sense would be only one of a range of ways that intention carries significance. Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx argues that H.L.A. Xxxx shares this understanding of the distinction between intention and foresight, and adds that Xxxx rejects the ethical relevance of double effect reasoning because he believes the distinction between intention and foresight to be based on...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Predictive Significance

  • Legal Significance Patient acknowledges that this Agreement is a legal document and creates certain rights and responsibilities. Patient also acknowledges having had a reasonable time to seek legal advice regarding the Agreement and has either chosen not to do so or has done so and is satisfied with the terms and conditions of the Agreement.

  • Non-Grievability No dispute over a claim for any benefits extended by this Health and Welfare Fund shall be subject to the grievance procedure.

  • Inherently Religious Activities Grantee may not use grant funding to engage in inherently religious activities, such as proselytizing, scripture study, or worship. Grantees may engage in inherently religious activities; however, these activities must be separate in time or location from the grant- funded program. Moreover, grantees must not compel program beneficiaries to participate in inherently religious activities. These requirements apply to all grantees, not just faith-based organizations.

  • Exceptions to Confidential Information The obligations set forth in Section 13.1 (Confidential Information) shall not apply to the extent that Confidential Information includes information which is: (a) now or hereafter, through no unauthorized act or failure to act on the Receiving Party’s part, in the public domain; (b) was in the Receiving Party’s possession before receipt from the Disclosing Party and obtained from a source other than the Disclosing Party and other than through the prior relationship of the Disclosing Party and the Receiving Party before the Separation Date; (c) hereafter furnished to the Receiving Party by a third party as a matter of right and without restriction on disclosure; (d) furnished to others by the Disclosing Party without restriction on disclosure; or (e) independently developed by the Receiving Party without use of the Disclosing Party’s Confidential Information. Nothing in this Agreement shall prevent the Receiving Party from disclosing Confidential Information to the extent the Receiving Party is legally compelled to do so by any governmental, investigative or judicial agency pursuant to proceedings over which such agency has jurisdiction; provided, however, that prior to any such disclosure, the Receiving Party shall: (i) assert the confidential nature of the Confidential Information to the agency; (ii) immediately notify the Disclosing Party in writing of the agency’s order or request to disclose; and (iii) cooperate fully with the Disclosing Party in protecting against any such disclosure and/or obtaining a protective order narrowing the scope of the compelled disclosure and protecting its confidentiality.

  • Scope Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, the Company hereby agrees to indemnify the Indemnitee to the fullest extent permitted by law, notwithstanding that such indemnification is not specifically authorized by the other provisions of this Agreement, the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation, the Company’s Bylaws or by statute. In the event of any change, after the date of this Agreement, in any applicable law, statute, or rule which expands the right of a Delaware corporation to indemnify a member of its board of directors or an officer, such changes shall be deemed to be within the purview of Indemnitee’s rights and the Company’s obligations under this Agreement. In the event of any change in any applicable law, statute or rule which narrows the right of a Delaware corporation to indemnify a member of its board of directors or an officer, such changes, to the extent not otherwise required by such law, statute or rule to be applied to this Agreement shall have no effect on this Agreement or the parties’ rights and obligations hereunder.

  • Exclusions to Confidential Information For purposes of this Confidentiality Agreement, Confidential Information does not include information that:

  • Ownership of Proprietary Information Unless otherwise provided by law any reports, histories, studies, tests, manuals, instructions, photographs, negatives, blue prints, plans, maps, data, system designs, computer code (which is intended to be consideration under this Contract), or any other documents or drawings, prepared or in the course of preparation by either party in performance of its obligations under this Contract shall be the joint property of both parties.

  • Employability Executive acknowledges (i) that Executive has sufficient abilities and talents to be able to obtain, upon the termination of Executive’s employment, comparable employment from another business while fully honoring and complying with the above covenants concerning confidential information and contacts with the Company’s or any of its Affiliates’ customers or employees, and (ii) the importance to the Company and its Affiliates of the above covenants. Accordingly, for a period of one (1) year following the termination of Executive’s employment with the Company and upon the Company’s reasonable request of Executive, Executive shall advise the Company of the identity of Executive’s new employer and shall provide a general description, in reasonable detail, of Executive’s new duties and responsibilities sufficient to inform the Company of its need to request a court order to enforce the above covenants.

  • Title to Confidential Information a) Transnet will retain all right, title and interest in and to its Confidential Information and Background Intellectual Property and the Supplier/Service Provider acknowledges that it has no claim of any nature in and to the Confidential Information and Background Intellectual Property that is proprietary to Transnet. For the avoidance of doubt all the Supplier/Service Provider’s Background Intellectual Property shall remain vested in the Supplier/Service Provider.

  • Ownership of Confidential Information All Confidential Information shall be and shall remain the property of the party which supplied it to the other party.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.