Preliminary Life Cycle Cost Analysis. 3.3.1 At the time set forth in the Project Schedule, the A/E shall prepare and submit three design concepts for a preliminary Life Cycle Cost Analysis (“LCCA”) and the preliminary LCCA for each concept to the Owner and Contracting Authority.
3.3.2 The alternative design concepts may include:
3.3.2.1 A baseline alternative, which complies in all aspects with the requirements of the current version of the Ohio Building Code (“OBC”), including the version of ASHRAE/IESNA 90.1 referenced in OBC Chapter 35;
3.3.2.2 A high-performance alternative, which demonstrates 20 percent improvement in energy efficiency over the version of ASHRAE/IESNA 90.1 referenced in OBC Chapter 35; and
3.3.2.3 A high-performance alternative, which demonstrates 30 percent improvement in energy efficiency over the version of ASHRAE/IESNA 90.1 referenced in OBC Chapter 35, and includes one or more renewable energy sources, such as waste heat recovery, solar energy, wind energy, biomass fuel energy, or geothermal energy.
3.3.3 The A/E shall base the Schematic Design Documents on the Owner’s selected preliminary design concept.
Preliminary Life Cycle Cost Analysis. 2.3.4.1 The CM shall receive and submit the A/E’s design concepts for a preliminary Life Cycle Cost Analysis (“LCCA”) and the preliminary LCCA for each concept to the Owner through the Contracting Authority.
Preliminary Life Cycle Cost Analysis. 3.3.1 At the time set forth in the Project Schedule, the A/E shall prepare and submit practical alternative three design concepts, considering passive and/or active building components, for the purpose of minimizing future energy consumption, for a preliminary Life Cycle Cost Analysis (“LCCA”) and the preliminary LCCA for each concept to the CM.
3.3.1.1 The A/E shall estimate the annual energy consumption and associated energy costs of each alternative, analyze their impact on facility life-cycle costs and incorporate cost effective alternatives into the final design.
3.3.1.2 The A/E shall re-evaluate life cycle cost as additional alternatives are considered during the continuing design development to assure their cost effective implementation.
Preliminary Life Cycle Cost Analysis. 3.3.1 At the time set forth in the Project Schedule, the A/E shall prepare and submit three design concepts for a preliminary Life Cycle Cost Analysis (“LCCA”) and the preliminary LCCA for each concept to the Contractor. The Contractor shall promptly review, comment on, and forward the preliminary LCCAs with the Contractor’s comments to the Owner and Contracting Authority.
3.3.2 The alternative design concepts may include:
3.3.2.1 A baseline alternative, which complies in all aspects with the requirements of the current version of the Ohio Building Code (“OBC”), including the version of ASHRAE/IESNA 90.1 referenced in OBC Chapter 35;
3.3.2.2 A high-performance alternative, which demonstrates 20 percent improvement in energy efficiency over the version of ASHRAE/IESNA 90.1 referenced in OBC Chapter 35; and
3.3.2.3 A high-performance alternative, which demonstrates 30 percent improvement in energy efficiency over the version of ASHRAE/IESNA 90.1 referenced in OBC Chapter 35, and includes one or more renewable energy sources, such as waste heat recovery, solar energy, wind energy, biomass fuel energy, or geothermal energy.
3.3.3 The A/E shall base the Schematic Design Documents on the Owner’s selected preliminary design concept.
Preliminary Life Cycle Cost Analysis. At the time set forth in the Project Schedule, the Consultant shall prepare and submit three design concepts for a preliminary Life Cycle Cost Analysis (“LCCA”) and the preliminary LCCA for each concept to the Owner and Contracting Authority. The alternative design concepts may include: A baseline alternative, which complies in all aspects with the requirements of the current version of the Ohio Building Code (“OBC”), including the version of ASHRAE/IESNA 90.1 referenced in OBC Chapter 35; A high-performance alternative, which demonstrates 20 percent improvement in energy efficiency over the version of ASHRAE/IESNA 90.1 referenced in OBC Chapter 35; and A high-performance alternative, which demonstrates 30 percent improvement in energy efficiency over the version of ASHRAE/IESNA 90.1 referenced in OBC Chapter 35, and includes one or more renewable energy sources, such as waste heat recovery, solar energy, wind energy, biomass fuel energy, or geothermal energy. The Consultant shall base the Schematic Design Documents on the Owner’s selected preliminary design concept.
Preliminary Life Cycle Cost Analysis. The A/E will submit the preliminary Life Cycle Cost Analysis to the CM. The CM shall promptly review, comment on, and forward the preliminary Life Cycle Cost Analysis with the CM’s comments to the Owner and Contracting Authority.
Preliminary Life Cycle Cost Analysis. 3.3.1 At the time set forth in the Project Schedule, the A/E shall prepare and submit three practical alternative design concepts, considering passive and/or active building components, for the purpose of minimizing future energy consumption, for a preliminary Life Cycle Cost Analysis (“LCCA”) and the preliminary LCCA for each concept to the Owner and Contracting Authority.
3.3.1.1 The A/E shall estimate the annual energy consumption and associated energy costs of each alternative, analyze their impact on facility life-cycle costs and incorporate cost effective alternatives into the final design.
3.3.1.2 The A/E shall re-evaluate life cycle cost as additional alternatives are considered during the continuing design development to assure their cost effective implementation.
3.3.2 The alternative design concepts may include:
3.3.2.1 A baseline alternative, which complies in all aspects with the requirements of the current version of the Ohio Building Code (“OBC”), including the version of ASHRAE/IESNA 90.1 referenced in OBC Chapter 35;
3.3.2.2 A high-performance alternative, which demonstrates 20 percent improvement in energy efficiency over the version of ASHRAE/IESNA 90.1 referenced in OBC Chapter 35; and
3.3.2.3 A high-performance alternative, which demonstrates 30 percent improvement in energy efficiency over the version of ASHRAE/IESNA 90.1 referenced in OBC Chapter 35, and includes one or more renewable energy sources, such as waste heat recovery, solar energy, wind energy, biomass fuel energy, or geothermal energy.
