Common use of Provisions for Review Clause in Contracts

Provisions for Review. 13.21.1 As indicated in the previous section, the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and Vice President for Academic Affairs shall, upon completing all evaluations, notify the University Librarian of his/her recommendations. At that time, and prior to evaluation and recommendation by the President, the University Librarian is responsible for seeing that each candidate who is not being recommended for promotion and/or tenure is made aware that the candidate may request a review of the case. The University Librarian shall provide the reasons for a negative recommendation at any step in the procedure. 13.21.2 If a negative recommendation was made by the Library Promotion and Tenure Committee, by the Chair, by the Associate University Librarian, or by the University Librarian, the request for review should be directed to the University Librarian. The University Librarian shall then designate an appropriate Review Panel, following procedures established by the Library faculty. On the basis of the case presented by the candidate, the Review Panel shall decide if a review is justified. 13.21.3 If the Review Panel decides the review is justified, it shall consider all promotion and tenure materials in the case, including any materials received subsequent to the initial evaluation of the case. The Review Panel shall have access to all previous recommendations made by the parties who considered the case. 13.21.4 Upon completing its review, the Review Panel shall promptly submit its recommendation to the University Librarian. 13.21.5 The recommendations of the Review Panel and the University Librarian, as well as any new materials in the case, shall be submitted by the University Librarian to the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and Vice President for Academic Affairs. 13.21.6 If the initial recommendations of the Library Promotion and Tenure Committee, the Chair, the Associate University Librarian, and the University Librarian were all positive, the request for review should be directed to the President who may request additional consideration of the case by the University Library according to the above procedures. 13.21.7 After the President's review, the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and Vice President for Academic Affairs shall notify the candidate, the Chair, the Associate University Librarian, and the University Librarian of the decision. The Chair shall notify the Library Promotion and Tenure Committee. There is no provision for further review. 13.21.8 It is the responsibility of the University Librarian to keep the candidate informed of the outcome at each level of the evaluation. The review procedure should be completed within three (3) weeks, or as soon as the University is able to complete it.

Provisions for Review. 13.21.1 As indicated in the previous section, the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and Vice President for Academic Affairs shall, upon completing all evaluations, notify the ▇▇▇▇ of the University Librarian Library of his/her recommendations. At that time, and prior to evaluation and recommendation by the President, the ▇▇▇▇ of the University Librarian Library is responsible for seeing that each candidate who is not being recommended for promotion and/or tenure is made aware that the candidate may request a review of the case. The ▇▇▇▇ of the University Librarian Library shall provide the reasons for a negative recommendation at any step in the procedure. 13.21.2 If a negative recommendation was made by the Library Promotion and Tenure Committee, by the Chair, by the Associate University Librarian, or by the ▇▇▇▇ of the University LibrarianLibrary, the request for review should be directed to the ▇▇▇▇ of the University LibrarianLibrary. The ▇▇▇▇ of the University Librarian Library shall then designate an appropriate Review Panel, following procedures established by the Library faculty. On the basis of the case presented by the candidate, the Review Panel shall decide if a review is justified. 13.21.3 If the Review Panel decides the review is justified, it shall consider all promotion and tenure materials in the case, including any materials received subsequent to the initial evaluation of the case. The Review Panel shall have access to all previous recommendations made by the parties who considered the case. 13.21.4 Upon completing its review, the Review Panel shall promptly submit its recommendation to the ▇▇▇▇ of the University LibrarianLibrary. 13.21.5 The recommendations of the Review Panel and the ▇▇▇▇ of the University LibrarianLibrary, as well as any new materials in the case, shall be submitted by the ▇▇▇▇ of the University Librarian Library to the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and Vice President for Academic Affairs. 13.21.6 If the initial recommendations of the Library Promotion and Tenure Committee, the Chair, the Associate University Librarian, and the ▇▇▇▇ of the University Librarian Library were all positive, the request for review should be directed to the President who may request additional consideration of the case by the University Library according to the above procedures. 13.21.7 After the President's review, the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and Vice President for Academic Affairs shall notify the candidate, the Chair, the Associate University Librarian, and the ▇▇▇▇ of the University Librarian Library of the decision. The Chair shall notify the Library Promotion and Tenure Committee. There is no provision for further review. 13.21.8 It is the responsibility of the ▇▇▇▇ of the University Librarian Library to keep the candidate informed of the outcome at each level of the evaluation. The review procedure should be completed within three (3) weeks, or as soon as the University is able to complete it.

Provisions for Review. 13.21.1 As indicated in the previous section, the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and Vice President for Academic Affairs shall, upon completing all evaluations, notify the University Librarian College ▇▇▇▇ of his/her recommendations. At that time, and prior to evaluation and recommendation by the President, the University Librarian College ▇▇▇▇ is responsible for seeing that each candidate who is not being recommended for promotion and/or tenure is made aware that the candidate may request a review of the case. The University Librarian ▇▇▇▇ shall provide the reasons for a negative recommendation at any step in the procedure. 13.21.2 If a negative recommendation was made by the Library College Promotion and Tenure Committee, by the Chair, by the Associate University LibrarianGraduate ▇▇▇▇, or by the University LibrarianCollege ▇▇▇▇, the request for review should be directed to the University LibrarianCollege ▇▇▇▇. The University Librarian ▇▇▇▇ shall then designate an appropriate College Review Panel, following procedures established by the Library facultycollege. On the basis of the case presented by the candidate, the Review Panel shall decide if a review is justified. 13.21.3 If the Review Panel decides the review is justified, it shall consider all promotion and tenure materials in the case, including any materials received subsequent to the initial evaluation of the case. The Review Panel shall have access to all previous recommendations made by the parties who considered the case. 13.21.4 Upon completing its review, the Review Panel shall promptly submit its recommendation to the University LibrarianCollege ▇▇▇▇. 13.21.5 When the candidate is a member of the graduate faculty, the Graduate ▇▇▇▇ shall also have access to all initial recommendations of the College Promotion and Tenure Committee and the College ▇▇▇▇, and shall independently review all materials relevant to the case, including any new information, and submit a recommendation. 13.21.6 The recommendations of the Review Panel Panel, the Graduate ▇▇▇▇ (when the candidate is a member of the graduate faculty), and the University LibrarianCollege ▇▇▇▇, as well as any new materials in the case, shall be submitted by the University Librarian College ▇▇▇▇ to the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and Vice President for Academic Affairs. No new information will be accepted after the College ▇▇▇▇ transmits the Promotion and Tenure Statement to the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and Vice President for Academic Affairs. 13.21.6 13.21.7 If the initial recommendations of the Library College Promotion and Tenure Committee, the Chair, Graduate ▇▇▇▇ (when the Associate University Librariancandidate is a member of the graduate faculty), and the University Librarian College ▇▇▇▇ were all positive, the request for review should be directed to the President who may request additional consideration of the case by the University Library college according to the above procedures. 13.21.7 13.21.8 After the President's review, the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and Vice President for Academic Affairs shall notify the candidate, the Chairdepartment Chairperson, the Associate University LibrarianGraduate ▇▇▇▇ (when the candidate is a member of the graduate faculty), and the University Librarian College ▇▇▇▇ of the decision. The Chair shall notify the Library Promotion and Tenure Committee. There is no provision for further review. 13.21.8 13.21.9 It is the responsibility of the University Librarian ▇▇▇▇ to keep the candidate informed of the outcome at each level of the evaluation. The review procedure should be completed within three (3) weeks, or as soon as the University is able to complete it.

Provisions for Review. 13.21.1 As indicated in the previous section, the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and Vice President for Academic Affairs shall, upon completing all evaluations, notify the University Librarian College Deans of his/her recommendations. At that time, and prior to evaluation and recommendation by the President, the University Librarian College ▇▇▇▇ is responsible for seeing that each candidate who is not being recommended for promotion and/or tenure is made aware that the candidate may request a review of the case. The University Librarian ▇▇▇▇ shall provide the reasons for a negative recommendation at any step in the procedure. 13.21.2 If a negative recommendation was made by the Library College Promotion and Tenure Committee, by the Chair, by the Associate University LibrarianGraduate ▇▇▇▇, or by the University LibrarianCollege ▇▇▇▇, the request for review should be directed to the University LibrarianCollege ▇▇▇▇. The University Librarian ▇▇▇▇ shall then designate an appropriate College Review Panel, following procedures established by the Library facultycollege. On the basis of the case presented by the candidate, the Review Panel shall decide if a review is justified. 13.21.3 If the Review Panel decides the review is justified, it shall consider all promotion and tenure materials in the case, including any materials received subsequent to the initial evaluation of the case. The Review Panel shall have access to all previous recommendations made by the parties who considered the case. 13.21.4 Upon completing its review, the Review Panel shall promptly submit its recommendation to the University LibrarianCollege ▇▇▇▇. 13.21.5 When the candidate is a member of the graduate faculty, the Graduate ▇▇▇▇ shall also have access to all initial recommendations of the College Promotion and Tenure Committee and the College ▇▇▇▇, and shall independently review all materials relevant to the case, including any new information, and submit a recommendation. 13.21.6 The recommendations of the Review Panel Panel, the Graduate ▇▇▇▇, when the candidate is a member of the graduate faculty, and the University LibrarianCollege ▇▇▇▇, as well as any new materials in the case, shall be submitted by the University Librarian College ▇▇▇▇ to the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and Vice President for Academic Affairs. No new information will be accepted after the College ▇▇▇▇ transmits the Promotion and Tenure Statement to the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and Vice President for Academic Affairs. 13.21.6 13.21.7 If the initial recommendations of the Library College Promotion and Tenure Committee, the ChairGraduate ▇▇▇▇, when the Associate University Librariancandidate is a member of the graduate faculty, and the University Librarian College ▇▇▇▇ were all positive, the request for review should be directed to the President who may request additional consideration of the case by the University Library College according to the above procedures. 13.21.7 13.21.8 After the President's review, the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and Vice President for Academic Affairs shall notify the candidate, the ChairTSAS Director, the Associate University LibrarianGraduate ▇▇▇▇, when the candidate is a member of the graduate faculty, and the University Librarian College ▇▇▇▇ of the decision. The Chair shall notify the Library Promotion and Tenure Committee. There is no provision for further review. 13.21.8 13.21.9 It is the responsibility of the University Librarian ▇▇▇▇ to keep the candidate informed of the outcome at each level of the evaluation. The review procedure should be completed within three (3) weeks, or as soon as the University is able to complete it.

Provisions for Review. 13.21.1 As indicated in the previous section, the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and ▇/Executive Vice President for Academic Affairs shall, upon completing all evaluations, notify the University Librarian College Deans of his/her recommendations. At that time, and prior to evaluation and recommendation by the President, the University Librarian College ▇▇▇▇ is responsible for seeing that each candidate who is not being recommended for promotion and/or tenure is made aware that the candidate may request a review of the case. The University Librarian ▇▇▇▇ shall provide the reasons for a negative recommendation at any step in the procedure. 13.21.2 If a negative recommendation was made by the Library College Promotion and Tenure Committee, by the Chair, by the Associate University LibrarianGraduate ▇▇▇▇, or by the University LibrarianCollege ▇▇▇▇, the request for review should be directed to the University LibrarianCollege ▇▇▇▇. The University Librarian ▇▇▇▇ shall then designate an appropriate College Review Panel, following procedures established by the Library facultycollege. On the basis of the case presented by the candidate, the Review Panel shall decide if a review is justified. 13.21.3 If the Review Panel decides the review is justified, it shall consider all promotion and tenure materials in the case, including any materials received subsequent to the initial evaluation of the case. The Review Panel shall have access to all previous recommendations made by the parties who considered the case. 13.21.4 Upon completing its review, the Review Panel shall promptly submit its recommendation to the University LibrarianCollege ▇▇▇▇. 13.21.5 When the candidate is a member of the graduate faculty, the Graduate ▇▇▇▇ shall also have access to all initial recommendations of the College Promotion and Tenure Committee and the College ▇▇▇▇, and shall independently review all materials relevant to the case, including any new information, and submit a recommendation. 13.21.6 The recommendations of the Review Panel Panel, the Graduate ▇▇▇▇, when the candidate is a member of the graduate faculty, and the University LibrarianCollege ▇▇▇▇, as well as any new materials in the case, shall be submitted by the University Librarian College ▇▇▇▇ to the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇/Executive Vice President. No new information will be accepted after the College ▇▇▇▇ transmits the Promotion and Tenure Statement to the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇/Executive Vice President for Academic AffairsPresident. 13.21.6 13.21.7 If the initial recommendations of the Library College Promotion and Tenure Committee, the ChairGraduate ▇▇▇▇, when the Associate University Librariancandidate is a member of the graduate faculty, and the University Librarian College ▇▇▇▇ were all positive, the request for review should be directed to the President who may request additional consideration of the case by the University Library College according to the above procedures. 13.21.7 13.21.8 After the President's review, the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and ▇/Executive Vice President for Academic Affairs shall notify the candidate, the ChairTSAS Director, the Associate University LibrarianGraduate ▇▇▇▇, when the candidate is a member of the graduate faculty, and the University Librarian College ▇▇▇▇ of the decision. The Chair shall notify the Library Promotion and Tenure Committee. There is no provision for further review. 13.21.8 13.21.9 It is the responsibility of the University Librarian ▇▇▇▇ to keep the candidate informed of the outcome at each level of the evaluation. The review procedure should be completed within three (3) weeks, or as soon as the University is able to complete it.

Provisions for Review. 13.21.1 As indicated in the previous section, the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and Vice President for Academic Affairs shall, upon completing all evaluations, notify the University Librarian College ▇▇▇▇ of his/her recommendations. At that time, and prior to evaluation and recommendation by the President, the University Librarian College ▇▇▇▇ is responsible for seeing that each candidate who is not being recommended for promotion and/or tenure is made aware that the candidate may request a review of the case. The University Librarian ▇▇▇▇ shall provide the reasons for a negative recommendation at any step in the procedure. 13.21.2 If a negative recommendation was made by the Library College Promotion and Tenure Committee, by the Chair, by the Associate University LibrarianGraduate ▇▇▇▇, or by the University LibrarianCollege ▇▇▇▇, the request for review should be directed to the University LibrarianCollege ▇▇▇▇. The University Librarian ▇▇▇▇ shall then designate an appropriate College Review Panel, following procedures established by the Library facultycollege. On the basis of the case presented by the candidate, the Review Panel shall decide if a review is justified. 13.21.3 If the Review Panel decides the review is justified, it shall consider all promotion and tenure materials in the case, including any materials received subsequent to the initial evaluation of the case. The Review Panel shall have access to all previous recommendations made by the parties who considered the case. 13.21.4 Upon completing its review, the Review Panel shall promptly submit its recommendation to the University LibrarianCollege ▇▇▇▇. 13.21.5 Where appropriate, the Graduate ▇▇▇▇ shall also have access to all initial recommendations of the College Promotion and Tenure Committee and the College ▇▇▇▇, and shall independently review all materials relevant to the case, including any new information, and submit a recommendation. 13.21.6 The recommendations of the Review Panel Panel, the Graduate ▇▇▇▇, where appropriate, and the University LibrarianCollege ▇▇▇▇, as well as any new materials in the case, shall be submitted by the University Librarian College ▇▇▇▇ to the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and Vice President for Academic Affairs. No new information will be accepted after the College ▇▇▇▇ transmits the Promotion and Tenure Statement to the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and Executive Vice President. 13.21.6 13.21.7 If the initial recommendations of the Library College Promotion and Tenure Committee, the ChairGraduate ▇▇▇▇, the Associate University Librarianwhere appropriate, and the University Librarian College ▇▇▇▇ were all positive, the request for review should be directed to the President who may request additional consideration of the case by the University Library College according to the above procedures. 13.21.7 13.21.8 After the President's review, the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and Vice President for Academic Affairs shall notify the candidate, the Chair, the Associate University LibrarianCollege Committee, and the University Librarian College ▇▇▇▇ of the decision. The Chair shall notify the Library Promotion and Tenure Committee. There is no provision for further review. 13.21.8 13.21.9 It is the responsibility of the University Librarian College ▇▇▇▇ to keep the candidate informed of the outcome at each level of the evaluation. The review procedure should be completed within three (3) weeks, or as soon as the University is able to complete it.three

Provisions for Review. 13.21.1 As indicated in the previous section, the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and ▇/Executive Vice President for Academic Affairs shall, upon completing all evaluations, notify the University Librarian of his/her recommendations. At that time, and prior to evaluation and recommendation by the President, the University Librarian is responsible for seeing that each candidate who is not being recommended for promotion and/or tenure is made aware that the candidate may request a review of the case. The University Librarian shall provide the reasons for a negative recommendation at any step in the procedure. 13.21.2 If a negative recommendation was made by the Library Promotion and Tenure Committee, by the Chair, by the Associate University Librarian, or by the University Librarian, the request for review should be directed to the University Librarian. The University Librarian shall then designate an appropriate Review Panel, following procedures established by the Library faculty. On the basis of the case presented by the candidate, the Review Panel shall decide if a review is justified. 13.21.3 If the Review Panel decides the review is justified, it shall consider all promotion and tenure materials in the case, including any materials received subsequent to the initial evaluation of the case. The Review Panel shall have access to all previous recommendations made by the parties who considered the case. 13.21.4 Upon completing its review, the Review Panel shall promptly submit its recommendation to the University Librarian. 13.21.5 The recommendations of the Review Panel and the University Librarian, as well as any new materials in the case, shall be submitted by the University Librarian to the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and ▇/Executive Vice President for Academic AffairsPresident. 13.21.6 If the initial recommendations of the Library Promotion and Tenure Committee, the Chair, the Associate University Librarian, and the University Librarian were all positive, the request for review should be directed to the President who may request additional consideration of the case by the University Library according to the above procedures. 13.21.7 After the President's review, the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and ▇/Executive Vice President for Academic Affairs shall notify the candidate, the Chair, the Associate University Librarian, and the University Librarian of the decision. The Chair shall notify the Library Promotion and Tenure Committee. There is no provision for further review. 13.21.8 It is the responsibility of the University Librarian to keep the candidate informed of the outcome at each level of the evaluation. The review procedure should be completed within three (3) weeks, or as soon as the University is able to complete it.

Provisions for Review. 13.21.1 As indicated in the previous section, the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and ▇/Executive Vice President for Academic Affairs shall, upon completing all evaluations, notify the University Librarian College ▇▇▇▇ of his/her recommendations. At that time, and prior to evaluation and recommendation by the President, the University Librarian College ▇▇▇▇ is responsible for seeing that each candidate who is not being recommended for promotion and/or tenure is made aware that the candidate may request a review of the case. The University Librarian ▇▇▇▇ shall provide the reasons for a negative recommendation at any step in the procedure. 13.21.2 If a negative recommendation was made by the Library College Promotion and Tenure Committee, by the Chair, by the Associate University LibrarianGraduate ▇▇▇▇, or by the University LibrarianCollege ▇▇▇▇, the request for review should be directed to the University LibrarianCollege ▇▇▇▇. The University Librarian ▇▇▇▇ shall then designate an appropriate College Review Panel, following procedures established by the Library facultycollege. On the basis of the case presented by the candidate, the Review Panel shall decide if a review is justified. 13.21.3 If the Review Panel decides the review is justified, it shall consider all promotion and tenure materials in the case, including any materials received subsequent to the initial evaluation of the case. The Review Panel shall have access to all previous recommendations made by the parties who considered the case. 13.21.4 Upon completing its review, the Review Panel shall promptly submit its recommendation to the University LibrarianCollege ▇▇▇▇. 13.21.5 When the candidate is a member of the graduate faculty, the Graduate ▇▇▇▇ shall also have access to all initial recommendations of the College Promotion and Tenure Committee and the College ▇▇▇▇, and shall independently review all materials relevant to the case, including any new information, and submit a recommendation. 13.21.6 The recommendations of the Review Panel Panel, the Graduate ▇▇▇▇ (when the candidate is a member of the graduate faculty), and the University LibrarianCollege ▇▇▇▇, as well as any new materials in the case, shall be submitted by the University Librarian College ▇▇▇▇ to the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇/Executive Vice President. No new information will be accepted after the College ▇▇▇▇ transmits the Promotion and Tenure Statement to the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇/Executive Vice President for Academic AffairsPresident. 13.21.6 13.21.7 If the initial recommendations of the Library College Promotion and Tenure Committee, the Chair, Graduate ▇▇▇▇ (when the Associate University Librariancandidate is a member of the graduate faculty), and the University Librarian College ▇▇▇▇ were all positive, the request for review should be directed to the President who may request additional consideration of the case by the University Library college according to the above procedures. 13.21.7 13.21.8 After the President's review, the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and ▇/Executive Vice President for Academic Affairs shall notify the candidate, the Chairdepartment Chairperson, the Associate University LibrarianGraduate ▇▇▇▇ (when the candidate is a member of the graduate faculty), and the University Librarian College ▇▇▇▇ of the decision. The Chair shall notify the Library Promotion and Tenure Committee. There is no provision for further review. 13.21.8 13.21.9 It is the responsibility of the University Librarian ▇▇▇▇ to keep the candidate informed of the outcome at each level of the evaluation. The review procedure should be completed within three (3) weeks, or as soon as the University is able to complete it.