Pursuant to M S. 43A.27, Subdivision 3a(1), an employee who separates or retires from State service and who, at the time of separation has five (5) or more years of allowable pension service and is entitled to immediately receive an annuity under a State retirement program and, who is not eligible for regular (non-disability) Medicare coverage, may continue to participate in the health and dental coverages offered through the Group Insurance Program. Consistent with M.S. 43A.27, Subdivision 3a(2), an employee who separates or retires from State service and who, at the time of separation is at least fifty (50) years of age and at least fifteen (15) years of State service may continue to participate in the health and dental coverages offered through the Group Insurance Program. Retiree coverage must be coordinated with Medicare.
Pursuant to Fed R. CIV. P. 23(e), the Court finds that the Settlement embodied in the Settlement Agreement is fair, reasonable and adequate to the Plan and the Settlement Class, and more particularly finds that:
(a) The Settlement was negotiated vigorously and at arm’s-length, via a Court- supervised settlement conference, by Defense Counsel, on the one hand, and the Named Plaintiffs and Class Counsel on behalf of the Settlement Class, on the other hand;
(b) Plaintiffs and Defendants had sufficient information to evaluate the settlement value of the Action;
(c) If the Settlement had not been achieved, Named Plaintiffs and the Settlement Class faced the expense, risk, and uncertainty of extended litigation;
(d) The amount of the Settlement – one million, eight hundred thousand dollars ($1,800,000.00) is fair, reasonable, and adequate, taking into account the costs, risks, and delay of trial and appeal. The method of distributing the Class Settlement Amount is efficient and requires no filing of claims. The Settlement terms related to attorneys’ fees do not raise any questions concerning fairness of the Settlement, and there are no agreements, apart from the Settlement, required to be considered under FED. R. CIV. P. 23(e)(2)(C)(iv). The Class Settlement Amount is within the range of settlement values obtained in similar cases;
(e) At all times, the Named Plaintiffs and Class Counsel have acted independently of Defendants and in the interest of the Settlement Class; and
(f) The Court has duly considered and overruled any filed objection(s) to the Settlement to the extent there were any.
Pursuant to G S. 143-59.2(b), the undersigned hereby certifies that none of the Contractor’s officers, directors, or owners (if the Contractor is an unincorporated business entity) has been convicted of any violation of Chapter 78A of the General Statutes or the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 within 10 years immediately prior to the date of the bid solicitation.
Pursuant to Minn Stat. § 16C.145, the Contractor must comply with the following nonvisual technology access standards to the extent required by law: • That the effective interactive control and use of the technology, including the operating system applications programs, prompts, and format of the data presented, are readily achievable by nonvisual means; • That the nonvisual access technology must be compatible with information technology used by other individuals with whom the blind or visually impaired individual must interact; • That nonvisual access technology must be integrated into networks used to share communications among employees, program participants, and the public; and • That the nonvisual access technology must have the capability of providing equivalent access by nonvisual means to telecommunications or other interconnected network services used by persons who are not blind or visually impaired; and • Executive branch state agencies subject to Section 16E.03, subdivision 9, are not required to include nonvisual technology access standards developed under this Section in contracts for the procurement of information technology. These standards do not require the installation of software or peripheral devices used for nonvisual access when the information technology is being used by individuals who are not blind or visually impaired.
Pursuant to T C.A. § 00-00-000, the Charter School may apply for renewal of this Charter Agreement by application submitted no later than April 1 of the year prior to the year in which this Agreement expires and in accordance with Authorizer renewal rules and policies. This Agreement may be renewed without modification, except for the incorporation by attachment of the approved renewal application. The Parties may also amend this Agreement as part of the renewal process.
Pursuant to Public Contract Code section 9201, the District shall provide timely notification to Developer of the receipt of any third-party Claim relating to this Contract. The District shall be entitled to recover its reasonable costs incurred in providing said notification.
Pursuant to A R.S. §35-215, the Consultant and its Subconsultant(s) with intent to defraud, deceive, improperly influence, obstruct or impair an audit being conducted or about to be conducted in relation to any Contract or subcontract with the Department is guilty of a Class 5 Felony.
Charges Pursuant to Exhibit F The total estimated amount for charges pursuant to this exhibit is set forth in Exhibit G.
Pursuant to the Company's customary policies in force at the time of payment, Executive shall be promptly reimbursed, against presentation of vouchers or receipts therefor, for all authorized expenses properly incurred by Executive on the Company's behalf in the performance of Executive's duties hereunder.
Charges Pursuant to Exhibit C The total estimated amount for charges pursuant to this exhibit is set forth in Exhibit G.
