Rating structure Sample Clauses

Rating structure. The rating structure presented here serves as a model. (1) A rating of Meets Expectations will be demonstrated by successfully meeting the normal performance standards of the position description. The faculty member’s performance includes a combination of the following: a sufficient level of organization and planning to complete assigned activities by deadlines with some direction from the supervisor, and responsiveness to library users. Service and research/creative/scholarly activities reflect the commitment to the University community, engagement in professional development, and participation in the broader professional community outside of the university. (2) A rating of Exceeds Expectations will be demonstrated by a faculty member exceeding in quantity and/or quality the normal minimum performance standards of those rated Meets Expectations. (3) A rating of Far Exceeds Expectations will be demonstrated by a faculty member exceeding in quantity and/or quality the expectations for those rated Exceeds Expectations. (4) A rating of Below Expectations will be demonstrated by a faculty member failing to meet the normal minimal performance standards of those rated Meets Expectations. (5) A rating of Unsatisfactory will be demonstrated by a faculty member engaging in practices that are detrimental to supporting student and faculty success. There is evidence that the faculty member lacks the competence to perform the requirements of the job description and remediation is unsuccessful. Service and research/creative/scholarly activities reflect little to no engagement in the university or professional community.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Rating structure. The rating structure presented here serves as a model. (1) A rating of Meets Expectations will be demonstrated by successfully meeting the normal performance standards of the position description. The (2) A rating of Exceeds Expectations will be demonstrated by a faculty member exceeding in quantity and/or quality the normal minimum performance standards of those rated Meets Expectations. (3) A rating of Far Exceeds Expectations will be demonstrated by a faculty member exceeding in quantity and/or quality the expectations for those rated Exceeds Expectations. (4) A rating of Below Expectations will be demonstrated by a faculty member failing to meet the normal minimal performance standards of those rated Meets Expectations. (5) A rating of Unsatisfactory will be demonstrated by a faculty member engaging in practices that are detrimental to supporting student and faculty success. There is evidence that the faculty member lacks the competence to perform the requirements of the job description and remediation is unsuccessful. Service and research/creative/scholarly activities reflect little to no engagement in the university or professional community.
Sample 1

Related to Rating structure

  • Ratings No “nationally recognized statistical rating organization” as such term is defined for purposes of Rule 436(g)(2) (i) has imposed (or has informed the Company that it is considering imposing) any condition (financial or otherwise) on the Company’s retaining any rating assigned to the Company or any securities of the Company or (ii) has indicated to the Company that it is considering any of the actions described in Section 7(c)(ii) hereof.

  • Rating The Notes can be issued without the requirement that they have any rating from a nationally recognized statistical rating organization.

  • Maintenance of Ratings At all times, Borrower shall use commercially reasonable efforts to maintain (x) a corporate family rating issued by Xxxxx’x and a corporate credit rating issued by S&P and (y) public ratings issued by Xxxxx’x and S&P with respect to its senior secured debt.

  • Moody’s Xxxxx’x Investors Service, Inc. and its successors.

  • Maintenance of Rating Since the execution of this Agreement, there shall not have been any decrease in or withdrawal of the rating of any securities of the Company or any of its subsidiaries (including the Bank) by any “nationally recognized statistical rating organization” (as defined for purposes of Section 3(a)(62) of the 0000 Xxx) or any notice given of any intended or potential decrease in or withdrawal of any such rating or of a possible change in any such rating that does not indicate the direction of the possible change.

  • Debt Rating The Liquidity Provider has a short-term debt ratings of “P-1” from Xxxxx’x and “F1+” from Fitch.

  • Temperature Measurement Temperature will be measured by the nearest automatic Melbourne Bureau of Meteorology Monitoring Station for example (but not limited to): Melbourne, Moorabbin, Dunns Hill, Melbourne Airport, Frankston, and Point Xxxxxx. At the commencement of each project, the onsite management and employee representatives shall agree which is to be the applicable automatic weather monitoring station.

  • Rating Agency Downgrade In the event that BSFP’s long-term unsecured and unsubordinated debt rating is withdrawn or reduced below “AA-” by S&P or its long-term unsecured and unsubordinated debt rating is withdrawn or reduced below “Aa3” by Moody’s (and together with S&P and Fitch, the “Swap Rating Agencies”, and such rating thresholds, “Approved Rating Thresholds”), then within 30 days after such rating withdrawal or downgrade, BSFP shall, subject to the Rating Agency Condition, at its own expense, either (i) cause another entity to replace BSFP as party to this Agreement that meets or exceeds the Approved Rating Thresholds and that is approved by Radian Insurance Inc. and Financial Guaranty Insurance Company (each a “NIMS Insurer” and collectively, the “NIMS Insurers”) (which approval shall not be unreasonably withheld) on terms substantially similar to this Agreement, (ii) obtain a guaranty of, or a contingent agreement of another person with the Approved Rating Thresholds, to honor, BSFP’s obligations under this Agreement; provided that such other person is approved by the NIMS Insurers, such approval not to be unreasonably withheld, (iii) post collateral satisfactory to each Swap Rating Agency and the NIMS Insurers which will be sufficient to restore the immediately prior ratings of the Certificates and any note insured by the NIMS Insurers, or (iv) establish any other arrangement satisfactory to the Swap Rating Agencies and the NIMS Insurers, which will be sufficient to restore the immediately prior ratings of the Certificates and any note insured by the NIMS Insurers. For purposes of this provision, “Rating Agency Condition” means, with respect to any particular proposed act or omission to act hereunder that the party acting or failing to act must consult with any of the Swap Rating Agencies then providing a rating of the Certificates and receive from the Swap Rating Agencies a prior written confirmation that the proposed action or inaction would not cause a downgrade or withdrawal of the then-current rating of the Certificates.

  • Cooperation with Rating Agencies If the ratings assigned to the Offered Notes by the Rating Agencies are conditional on the delivering of documents or the taking of any other actions by the Depositor, the Depositor will deliver those documents and take those actions.

  • Industry Ratings The City will only accept coverage from an insurance carrier who offers proof that it: a. Is authorized to do business in the State of Kansas; b. Carries a Best's policyholder rating of A- or better; and c. Carries at least a Class VIII financial rating; or d. Is a company mutually agreed upon by the City and Consulting Engineer/Architect.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!