Common use of Recommendations of the Faculty Tenure and Promotion Committee Clause in Contracts

Recommendations of the Faculty Tenure and Promotion Committee. (i) Recommendations for tenure only and for simultaneous consideration of tenure and/or promotion to Associate Professor shall be submitted to the Xxxxxxx and Vice-President (Academic) by December 15. (ii) Recommendations for promotion only (whether to Associate Professor or Full Professor) shall be submitted to the Xxxxxxx and Vice-President (Academic) as Chair of the University Promotion Committee by January 31. (iii) The findings of the committee along with the complete dossier (including the letters from the referees) of each candidate are submitted to the Xxxxxxx and Vice- President (Academic). Following consideration by the Faculty Committee, the Xxxx shall advise each candidate in writing, within one week, whether the Faculty Committee agrees or disagrees with the departmental recommendation. If the Faculty Committee disagrees with a positive departmental recommendation, the written communication shall indicate to the candidate at least in which area or areas of performance in relation to the relevant approved unit standards that the committee would expect as evidence of further development before recommending in favour of tenure and/or promotion. (iv) The Xxxx shall also write his or her own assessment of the candidate, and shall indicate whether or not he or she agrees with the recommendation of the Faculty Tenure and Promotion Committee. The Xxxx must consult the Faculty Tenure and Promotion Committee before adding his or her assessment to the dossier and cannot substitute his or her judgment for the recommendations of the Faculty Tenure and Promotion Committee. A copy of the Xxxx’x assessment shall be provided to the candidate. (v) In the event of perceived deficiencies with respect to the approved unit standards for tenure, a candidate may not be denied tenure unless there have been annual pre-tenure reviews of performance as detailed in Article 10.1(c). If that has not been done, the candidate must be given an extension adequate to rectify the deficiencies before a final decision on tenure is taken.

Recommendations of the Faculty Tenure and Promotion Committee. (i) Recommendations for tenure only and for simultaneous consideration of tenure and/or promotion to Associate Professor shall be submitted to the Xxxxxxx and Vice-President (Academic) by December 15. (ii) Recommendations for promotion only (whether to Associate Professor or Full Professor) shall be submitted to the Xxxxxxx and Vice-President (Academic) as Chair of the University Promotion Committee by January 31. (iii) The findings of the committee along with the complete dossier (including the letters from the referees) of each candidate are submitted to the Xxxxxxx and Vice- President (Academic). Following consideration by the Faculty Committee, the Xxxx shall advise each candidate in writing, within one week, whether the Faculty Committee agrees or disagrees with the departmental recommendation. If the Faculty Committee disagrees with a positive departmental recommendation, the written communication shall indicate to the candidate at least in which area or areas of performance in relation to the relevant approved unit standards that the committee would expect as evidence of further development before recommending in favour of tenure and/or promotion. (iv) The Xxxx shall also write his or her their own assessment of the candidate, and shall indicate whether or not he or she agrees they agree with the recommendation of the Faculty Tenure and Promotion Committee. The Xxxx must consult the Faculty Tenure and Promotion Committee before adding his or her their assessment to the dossier and cannot substitute his or her their judgment for the recommendations of the Faculty Tenure and Promotion Committee. A copy of the Xxxx’x assessment shall be provided to the candidate. (v) In the event of perceived deficiencies with respect to the approved unit standards for tenure, a candidate may not be denied tenure unless there have been annual pre-tenure reviews of performance as detailed in Article 10.1(c). If that has not been done, the candidate must be given an extension adequate to rectify the deficiencies before a final decision on tenure is taken.