Referral of Cases Sample Clauses

Referral of Cases. 464 In order to meet the needs of our patients, the Employer may, at its discretion, assign patients to outside providers when appointments are not available within timeframes required by law and regulatory standards.

Referral of Cases. 4.1 In the discharge of its duties, each party will actively consider whether it should refer matters to the other party for possible action, having regard to the other party’s Functions. 4.2 The ICAC may make a referral to the SFC for evaluation of possible action where it considers that: (a) the suspected criminality or misconduct falls outside the Functions of the ICAC (see paragraphs 2.1 and 2.2) but may fall within the Functions of the SFC under the laws administered by the SFC (see paragraphs 2.4 and 2.5); or (b) the suspected criminality or misconduct falls within the Functions of both the ICAC and the SFC but: ii. the SFC is also handling the same case and it would be duplicative for the ICAC to conduct a parallel investigation. 4.3 The SFC may make a referral to the ICAC for evaluation of possible action where it considers that: (a) the suspected criminality falls outside the Functions of the SFC under the laws administered by the SFC (see paragraphs 2.4 and 2.5) but may fall within the Functions of the ICAC (see paragraphs 2.1 and 2.2); or (b) the suspected criminality falls within the Functions of both the ICAC and the SFC but: ii. the ICAC is also handling the same case and it would be duplicative for the SFC to conduct a parallel investigation. 4.4 Following receipt of sufficient materials to conduct a referral evaluation, the party receiving a referral (“Receiving Party”) will advise the referring party (“Referring Party”) about the outcome of its evaluation as soon as practicable. If the Receiving Party cannot complete the evaluation within a reasonable period of time, particularly relating to a complicated case, it will provide an update to the Referring Party on the status of the evaluation. If the Receiving Party has communicated to the Referring Party its acceptance of the referral for investigation, the Referring Party will not take any action that may compromise the investigation of the Receiving Party without prior consultation with the latter.

Referral of Cases. 5.1 In the discharge of its Functions, each Party will actively consider whether it should refer matters to the other Party for possible action, having regard to the other Party’s Functions. 5.2 The HKP may make a referral to the FRC for its evaluation of possible action where it considers that a case falls: (a) outside the Functions of the HKP but may fall within the Functions of the FRC; or (b) within the Functions of the HKP but also contains elements which may fall within the Functions of the FRC. 5.3 The FRC may make a referral to the HKP for its evaluation of possible action where it considers that a case falls: (a) outside the Functions of the FRC but there is suspected criminality which may fall within the Functions of the HKP; or (b) within the Functions of the FRC but also contains criminal elements which may fall within the Functions of the HKP. 5.4 Following receipt of sufficient materials to conduct a referral evaluation, the Party receiving a referral (Receiving Party) will advise the referring Party (Referring Party) about the evaluation outcome as soon as practicable. If the Receiving Party cannot complete the evaluation within a reasonable period of time, particularly relating to a complicated case, it will provide an update to the Referring Party on the status of the evaluation. If the Receiving Party has communicated to the Referring Party its acceptance of the referral for investigation, the Referring Party will not take any action that may compromise the investigation of the Receiving Party without prior consultation with the latter.

Referral of Cases. 3.3.1. The referral of the Arrest Warrant will be made by passing the hard copy (by post) to the Supplier from the local CSA Operations Court Presenting Officer (CPO). The CPO will also keep a copy of the Warrant and they are responsible for the transfer of all relevant and available information regarding the NRP name and address to allow the Supplier to execute the Arrest Warrant. 3.3.2. The Supplier must confirm arrival of the Arrest Warrants within two Service Working Days of receipt from the CPO. This must be provided to the named CPO. The CPO does not have the encryption software so communication should not be transposed via email. 3.3.3. The CPO will inform the Supplier if the NRP has a ‘potentially violent’ indicator to enable the Supplier to carry out their own Risk Assessment.

Referral of Cases. 4.1 In the discharge of its duties, each party will actively consider whether it should refer matters to the other party for possible action, having regard to the other party’s Functions. 4.2 The ICAC may make a referral to the IA for evaluation of possible action where it considers that: (a) a matter falls outside the Functions of the ICAC (see paragraphs 2.1 and 2.2) but may fall within the Functions of the IA under the laws administered by the IA (see paragraph 2.3); or (b) a matter falls within the Functions of the ICAC but also contains elements which may fall within the Functions of the IA. 4.3 The IA may make a referral to the ICAC for evaluation of possible action where it considers that: (a) a matter falls outside the Functions of the IA under the laws administered by the IA (see paragraph 2.3) but may fall within the Functions of the ICAC (see paragraphs 2.1 and 2.2); or (b) a matter falls within the Functions of IA but also contains elements which may fall within the Functions of the ICAC.