Regulation vs Radical Change Sample Clauses

Regulation vs Radical Change. Leading on to the Regulation vs Radical Change continuum, there are less assumptions and criteria providing guidance. And like the Objective-Subjective continuum, I again consider that my position is somewhat central, or at least not at either ends of the extremes. In terms of Regulation, I understand the views of exploring society in terms of its unity and cohesiveness based on my natural science background, where one takes a deductive approach (Gray, 2017) and would look for patterns and dominant themes to explain the data (Park, Konge and Xxxxxx Xx, 2020), uniting and minimising outliers and contradictions (Xxxxxxxx, 1993), thus maintaining the status quo. However, in terms of Radical Change, I am also interested in trying to improve, in this case KM within conservation organisations to aid nature and society. This is also particularly relevant for the conservation sector, whereby up until recently the ‘status quo’ could be seen as exploitative and disadvantageous for nature (Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxx, and Xxxxxxxx, 2005), whereby nature is only valued in its societal and economic benefits. So maybe a ‘radical change’ within conservation might be required. However, for this research, I am not looking to make a radical change, through big areas of conflict or contradiction (Xxxxx, 1996). Instead, I would like this research to help raise awareness of KM which might result in some small changes to the organisations and the conservation sectors, building upon prior research to produce change rather than through conflict. This goes back to the human nature continuum, where change and free will can occur, within the societal system, and that is the level of change that I am aiming for within my research. To summarise the Functionalist paradigm, assume there is an objective reality and works towards the stability and maintenance of the status quo. The Interpretivist paradigm assumes that reality is socially constructed that is continuously being negotiated by individuals who like the Functionalist paradigm are not interested in changing the status quo. The Radical Structuralist paradigm has assumptions around an objective reality but is working towards changing this reality, whilst the Radical Humanist paradigm has ideological intentions of changing the socially constructed realities (Xxxxxxx and Xxxxxx, 1979; Xxxxx and Xxxxx. 1990; Shepherd and Challenger. 2013; Chia. 2019). These four paradigms I will be exploring in more detail in relation to knowledge and KM with...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Regulation vs Radical Change

  • REGULATION GG Each Fund represents and warrants that it does not engage in an “Internet gambling business,” as such term is defined in Section 233.2(r) of Federal Reserve Regulation GG (12 CFR 233) and covenants that it shall not engage in an Internet gambling business. In accordance with Regulation GG, each Fund is hereby notified that “restricted transactions,” as such term is defined in Section 233.2(y) of Regulation GG, are prohibited in any dealings with the Custodian pursuant to this Agreement or otherwise between or among any party hereto.

  • Investment Company Act Margin Regulations (a) No Loan Party is engaged or will be engaged, principally or as one of its important activities, in the business of purchasing or carrying margin stock (within the meaning of Regulation U issued by the FRB), or extending credit for the purpose of purchasing or carrying margin stock. None of the proceeds of the Borrowings shall be used directly or indirectly for the purpose of purchasing or carrying any margin stock, for the purpose of reducing or retiring any Indebtedness that was originally incurred to purchase or carry any margin stock or for any other purpose that might cause any of the Credit Extensions to be considered a “purpose credit” within the meaning of Regulations T, U, or X issued by the FRB. (b) None of the Loan Parties, any Person Controlling any Loan Party, or any Subsidiary is required to be registered as an “investment company” under the Investment Company Act of 1940.

  • Margin Regulations; Investment Company Act; Public Utility Holding Company Act (a) The Borrower is not engaged and will not engage, principally or as one of its important activities, in the business of purchasing or carrying margin stock (within the meaning of Regulation U issued by the FRB), or extending credit for the purpose of purchasing or carrying margin stock. (b) None of the Borrower, any Person Controlling the Borrower, or any Subsidiary (i) is a “holding company,” or a “subsidiary company” of a “holding company,” or an “affiliate” of a “holding company” or of a “subsidiary company” of a “holding company,” within the meaning of the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, or (ii) is or is required to be registered as an “investment company” under the Investment Company Act of 1940.

  • Investment Company Act; Public Utility Holding Company Act Neither the Borrower nor any Subsidiary is (a) an "investment company" as defined in, or subject to regulation under, the Investment Company Act of 1940 or (b) a "holding company" as defined in, or subject to regulation under, the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935.

  • Exchange Act Compliance; Regulations T, U and X None of the transactions contemplated herein or in the other Transaction Documents (including, without limitation, the use of proceeds from the sale of the Collateral Portfolio) will violate or result in a violation of Section 7 of the Exchange Act, or any regulations issued pursuant thereto, including, without limitation, Regulations T, U and X of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 12 C.F.R., Chapter II. The Borrower does not own or intend to carry or purchase, and no proceeds from the Advances will be used to carry or purchase, any “margin stock” within the meaning of Regulation U or to extend “purpose credit” within the meaning of Regulation U.

  • Public Utility Holding Company Act Neither the Company nor any of its Subsidiaries is a "holding company", or an "affiliate" of a "holding company" or a "subsidiary company" of a "holding company", within the meaning of the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935, as amended.

  • Regulation M Compliance The Company has not, and to its knowledge no one acting on its behalf has, (i) taken, directly or indirectly, any action designed to cause or to result in the stabilization or manipulation of the price of any security of the Company to facilitate the sale or resale of any of the Securities, (ii) sold, bid for, purchased, or, paid any compensation for soliciting purchases of, any of the Securities, or (iii) paid or agreed to pay to any Person any compensation for soliciting another to purchase any other securities of the Company, other than, in the case of clauses (ii) and (iii), compensation paid to the Company’s placement agent in connection with the placement of the Securities.

  • Investment Company Act of 1940 Engage in any business, enter into any transaction, use any securities or take any other action or permit any of its Subsidiaries to do any of the foregoing, that would cause it or any of its Subsidiaries to become subject to the registration requirements of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, by virtue of being an “investment company” or a company “controlled” by an “investment company” not entitled to an exemption within the meaning of such Act.

  • Regulation M Notice Unless the exceptive provisions set forth in Rule 101(c)(1) of Regulation M under the Exchange Act are satisfied with respect to the Shares, the Company shall give the Manager at least one Business Day’s prior notice of its intent to sell any Shares in order to allow the Manager time to comply with Regulation M.

  • Compliance with Investment Company Act The business and other activities of the Borrower and its Subsidiaries, including the making of the Loans hereunder, the application of the proceeds and repayment thereof by the Borrower and the consummation of the Transactions contemplated by the Loan Documents do not result in a violation or breach in any material respect of the provisions of the Investment Company Act or any rules, regulations or orders issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission thereunder, in each case that are applicable to the Borrower and its Subsidiaries.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!