Rehab Review Findings Sample Clauses

Rehab Review Findings a. Narrative Results.‌‌ i. A narrative explanation of the IRO’s findings regarding factors noted Section A.4 above and supporting rationale (including adequacy of documentation, patterns noted, etc.) regarding whether the Rehab Therapy Services in each Patient Stay reviewed by the IRO were medically necessary and appropriate. ii. A narrative explanation of the IRO’s findings and supporting rationale (including reasons for errors, patterns noted, etc.) regarding the identification of Overpayments. iii. For each Paid Claim in any Rehab Review Sample that resulted in an Overpayment, the IRO shall describe and review the system(s) and process(es) that generated the Paid Claim (including the identification, by position description, of the personnel involved in coding and billing) and identify any problems or weaknesses that may have resulted in the identified Overpayments. b. Quantitative Results.‌‌ i. Total number and percentage of Paid Claims reviewed in each Rehab Review Sample that the IRO determined Rehab Therapy Services that were: 1. Not medically necessary and appropriate;‌ 2. Not medically necessary and appropriate and resulted in an Overpayment;‌ 3. Not supported by sufficient documentation;‌ 4. Not supported by sufficient documentation and resulted in an Overpayment;‌ 5. Not coded correctly on the MDS form; and‌ 6. Not coded correctly on the MDS form and resulted in an Overpayment.‌ ii. Total dollar amount of Paid Claims in each Rehab Review Sample.‌ iii. Total dollar amount of all Overpayments in each Rehab Review Sample. iv. Error Rate in the each Rehab Review Sample. The Error Rate shall be calculated by dividing the Overpayment in each Rehab Review Sample by the total dollar amount associated with the Paid Claims in the Rehab Review Sample.‌ v. An estimate of the Overpayment at the mean point estimate for the Population in each Rehab Review Sample.‌ vi. A spreadsheet of the Rehab Review results that includes the following information for each Paid Claim that included a Rehab Therapy Service that the IRO determined was not medically necessary and appropriate: A. Subject Facility;‌ B. Beneficiary health insurance claim number; C. Dates of service; D. RUG code submitted; E. Initial amount reimbursed; F. Revised RUG code as determined by the IRO; G. Revised amount that should have been reimbursed as determined by the IRO; and H. Dollar difference between initial amount reimbursed and revised amount that should have been reimbursed as determined by th...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Rehab Review Findings a. A narrative explanation of the IRO’s findings and supporting rationale (including adequacy of documentation, patterns noted, etc.) regarding whether each Rehabilitation Therapy Service reviewed by the IRO was medically necessary and appropriate. b. Total number and percentage of Rehabilitation Therapy Services reviewed that the IRO determined were not supported by the medical record and not medically necessary and appropriate. c. A listing Rehab Therapy Patients and Rehabilitation Therapy Services at each Service Location for which the IRO has made a determination that the Rehabilitation Therapy Services were not supported by the medical record and not medically necessary and appropriate. d. The IRO’s report shall include any recommendations for improvements to Encore’s services and processes for determining the appropriate rehabilitation services to be provided and for documenting such services, based on the findings of the Rehab Review.

Related to Rehab Review Findings

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

  • Review Scope The parties confirm that the Asset Representations Review is not responsible for (a) reviewing the Receivables for compliance with the representations and warranties under the Transaction Documents, except as described in this Agreement or (b) determining whether noncompliance with the representations and warranties constitutes a breach of the Eligibility Representations. For the avoidance of doubt, the parties confirm that the review is not designed to determine why an Obligor is delinquent or the creditworthiness of the Obligor, either at the time of any Asset Review or at the time of origination of the related Receivable. Further, the Asset Review is not designed to establish cause, materiality or recourse for any Test Fail (as defined in Section 3.05).

  • Audit Findings Vendor shall implement any required safeguards as identified by Citizens or by any audit of Vendor’s privacy and security controls.

  • ADB’s Review of Procurement Decisions 11. All contracts procured under international competitive bidding procedures and contracts for consulting services shall be subject to prior review by ADB, unless otherwise agreed between the Borrower and ADB and set forth in the Procurement Plan.

  • Business Review Meetings In order to maintain the relationship between the Department and the Contractor, each quarter the Department may request a business review meeting. The business review meeting may include, but is not limited to, the following: • Successful completion of deliverables • Review of the Contractor’s performance • Review of minimum required reports • Addressing of any elevated Customer issues • Review of continuous improvement ideas that may help lower total costs and improve business efficiencies.

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Asset Representations Review Process Section 3.01 Asset Representations Review Notices and Identification of Review Receivables. On receipt of an Asset Representations Review Notice from the Seller according to Section 5.7 of the Receivables Purchase Agreement, the Asset Representations Reviewer will start an Asset Representations Review. The Servicer will provide the list of Review Receivables to the Asset Representations Reviewer promptly upon receipt of the Asset Representations Review Notice. The Asset Representations Reviewer will not be obligated to start, and will not start, an Asset Representations Review until an Asset Representations Review Notice and the related list of Review Receivables is received. The Asset Representations Reviewer is not obligated to verify (i) whether the conditions to the initiation of the Asset Representations Review and the issuance of an Asset Representations Review Notice described in Section 7.6 of the Indenture were satisfied or (ii) the accuracy or completeness of the list of Review Receivables provided by the Servicer.

  • Independent Review Contractor shall provide the Secretary of ADS/CIO an independent expert review of any Agency recommendation for any information technology activity when its total cost is $1,000,000.00 or greater or when CIO requires one. The State has identified two sub-categories for Independent Reviews, Standard and Complex. The State will identify in the SOW RFP the sub-category they are seeking. State shall not consider bids greater than the maximum value indicated below for this category. Standard Independent Review $25,000 Maximum Complex Independent Review $50,000 Maximum Per Vermont statute 3 V.S.A. 2222, The Secretary of Administration shall obtain independent expert review of any recommendation for any information technology initiated after July 1, 1996, as information technology activity is defined by subdivision (a) (10), when its total cost is $1,000,000 or greater or when required by the State Chief Information Officer. Documentation of this independent review shall be included when plans are submitted for review pursuant to subdivisions (a)(9) and (10) of this section. The independent review shall include: • An acquisition cost assessment • A technology architecture review • An implementation plan assessment • A cost analysis and model for benefit analysis • A procurement negotiation advisory services contract • An impact analysis on net operating costs for the agency carrying out the activity In addition, from time to time special reviews of the advisability and feasibility of certain types of IT strategies may be required. Following are Requirements and Capabilities for this Service: • Identify acquisition and lifecycle costs; • Assess wide area network (WAN) and/or local area network (LAN) impact; • Assess risks and/or review technical risk assessments of an IT project including security, data classification(s), subsystem designs, architectures, and computer systems in terms of their impact on costs, benefits, schedule and technical performance; • Assess, evaluate and critically review implementation plans, e.g.: • Adequacy of support for conversion and implementation activities • Adequacy of department and partner staff to provide Project Management • Adequacy of planned testing procedures • Acceptance/readiness of staff • Schedule soundness • Adequacy of training pre and post project • Assess proposed technical architecture to validate conformance to the State’s “strategic direction.” • Insure system use toolsets and strategies are consistent with State Chief Information Officer (CIO) policies, including security and digital records management; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to security and systems integration with other applications within the Department, and within the Agency, and existing or planned Enterprise Applications; • Perform cost and schedule risk assessments to support various alternatives to meet mission need, recommend alternative courses of action when one or more interdependent segment(s) or phase(s) experience a delay, and recommend opportunities for new technology insertions; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to the state of the art in this technology. • Assess a project’s backup/recovery strategy and the project’s disaster recovery plans for adequacy and conformance to State policy. • Evaluate the ability of a proposed solution to meet the needs for which the solution has been proposed, define the ability of the operational and user staff to integrate this solution into their work.

  • Program Review The State ECEAP Office will conduct a review of each contractor’s compliance with the ECEAP Contract and ECEAP Performance Standards every four years. The review will involve ECEAP staff and parents. After the Program Review, the State ECEAP Office will provide the contractor with a Program Review report. The contractor must submit an ECEAP Corrective Action Plan for non-compliance with ECEAP Performance Standards. The Plan must be approved by the State ECEAP Office.

  • Maintenance of Review Materials It will maintain copies of any Review Materials, Review Reports and other documents relating to a Review, including internal correspondence and work papers, for a period of at least two years after any termination of this Agreement.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!