Relative Weighted Average RoTCE Performance Sample Clauses

Relative Weighted Average RoTCE Performance. After the end of the Performance Period, the Committee will rank each member of the Comparison Group according to Weighted Average RoTCE, and Citigroup’s Weighted Average RoTCE relative to the Weighted Average RoTCE of members of the Comparison Group will determine the percentage of PSUs earned under the Weighted Average RoTCE metric, as follows: 0 Percentile ___% 25th Percentile ___% 50th Percentile ___% 75th or higher Percentile ___% After the end of the Performance Period, the Committee will rank each member of the Comparison Group according to Weighted Average RoTCE as follows: 1 100.00% 2 87.50% 3 75.00% 4 62.50% 5 50.00% 6 37.50% 7 25.00% 8 12.50% 9 00.00% Citigroup’s Weighted Average RoTCE will then be compared to Weighted Average RoTCE of the Comparison Group. If Citigroup’s Weighted Average RoTCE is (1) equal to the Weighted Average RoTCE of a member of the Comparison Group, then Citigroup’s percentile rank will be deemed to be equal to the percentile rank of that member, (2) between the Weighted Average RoTCE of two members of the Comparison Group, then Citigroup’s percentile rank will be based on the linear interpolation between the percentile rank of those members and (3) greater than Weighted Average RoTCE of the highest ranking Comparison Group member or less than the Weighted Average RoTCE of the lowest ranking Comparison Group member, then Citigroup’s percentile rank will be deemed to be 100.00% or 0.00%, respectively.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Relative Weighted Average RoTCE Performance

  • Maximum Leverage Permit, as of any fiscal quarter end, the ratio of (a) Adjusted Portfolio Equity as of such fiscal quarter end to (b) Funded Debt as of such fiscal quarter end, to be less than 5.00 to 1.00.

  • Maximum Senior Leverage Ratio Permit the Senior Leverage Ratio on the last day of any fiscal quarter during any period set forth below to be greater than the ratio set forth opposite such date or period below: Period Ratio ------ ----- September 30, 2001 2.50:1.0 December 31, 2001 2.00:1.0 March 31, 2002 through June 30, 2002 2.50:1.0 September 30, 2002 2.00:1.0 December 31, 2002 1.50:1.0 March 31, 2003 through June 30, 2003 2.00:1.0 September 30, 2003 1.50:1.0 December 31, 2003 and thereafter 1.25:1.0

  • Ongoing Performance Measures The Department intends to use performance-reporting tools in order to measure the performance of Contractor(s). These tools will include the Contractor Performance Survey (Exhibit H), to be completed by Customers on a quarterly basis. Such measures will allow the Department to better track Vendor performance through the term of the Contract(s) and ensure that Contractor(s) consistently provide quality services to the State and its Customers. The Department reserves the right to modify the Contractor Performance Survey document and introduce additional performance-reporting tools as they are developed, including online tools (e.g. tools within MFMP or on the Department's website).

  • Maximum Total Leverage Ratio The Borrower shall maintain, on the last day of each fiscal quarter set forth below, a Total Leverage Ratio of not more than the maximum ratio set forth below opposite such fiscal quarter: October 31, 2007, January 31, 2008, April 30, 2008, July 31, 2008, October 31, 2008 and January 31, 2009 4.7 to 1 April 30, 2009, July 31, 2009, October 31, 2009 and January 31, 2010 4.2 to 1 April 30, 2010 and each fiscal quarter thereafter 4.0 to 1

  • Maximum Leverage Ratio The Borrower will not permit the Leverage Ratio as of the end of any fiscal quarter to be greater than 0.55 to 1.00.

  • Annual Performance Evaluation On either a fiscal year or calendar year basis, (consistently applied from year to year), the Bank shall conduct an annual evaluation of Executive’s performance. The annual performance evaluation proceedings shall be included in the minutes of the Board meeting that next follows such annual performance review.

  • Performance Measure Grantee will adhere to the performance measures requirements documented in

  • Performance Measurement The Uniform Guidance requires completion of OMB-approved standard information collection forms (the PPR). The form focuses on outcomes, as related to the Federal Award Performance Goals that awarding Federal agencies are required to detail in the Awards.

  • Measuring EPP parameters Every 5 minutes, EPP probes will select one “IP address” of the EPP servers of the TLD being monitored and make an “EPP test”; every time they should alternate between the 3 different types of commands and between the commands inside each category. If an “EPP test” result is undefined/unanswered, the EPP service will be considered as unavailable from that probe until it is time to make a new test.

  • Measurement Period In this Agreement, unless the contrary intention appears, a reference to:

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!