Resistance Monitoring Sample Clauses

Resistance Monitoring. Insects are well known to develop resistance to insecticides. There is increasing documentation of insecticide resistance in populations of bollworm, tarnished plant bug and cotton aphids in the Midsouth. Therefore, an insecticide resistance monitoring program was instigated in 2006 for both bollworm and tarnished plant bug populations collected in West Tennessee. Monitoring resistance of key insect pests helps to document resistance and implement insect resistance management plans. Vial assays of adults are used in both cases. In 2012, no monitoring was done for tarnished plant bug, although insecticide testing indicates high resistance to the pyrethroid insecticides (data not shown). Vial assays using 5 ug/vial cypermethrin, a synthetic pyrethroid, were again performed on bollworm moths. This represents a discriminating dose where 90% or higher of susceptible moths are expected to die after 24 h exposure. Fresh bollworm (i.e., corn earworm) moths were collected from traps that were baited with pheromone lure on the previous night. All moths were collected in Madison County at the West Tennessee Research and Education Center (WTREC). For several years and as part of a cooperative effort, moths from the above tests have been submitted to scientists in Mississippi (X. Xxxxxx, X. Xxxxxxx) who are assaying moths using a technique that determines if the larval host was a C3 or C4 plant. These data are being collected to better understand the population dynamics of bollworm and determine the impact of host origin on resistance levels. C3 plants are broadleaves such as cotton and soybean. C4 plants are usually grasses, and presumably any bollworms testing positive for C4 plants developed on corn or sorghum because these are primary hosts during the time frame of moth trapping.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Resistance Monitoring. Insects are well known to develop resistance to insecticides. There is increasing documentation of bollworm resistance to pyrethroid insecticides in parts of the lower Midsouth. Although pyrethroid and acephate resistance in some tarnished plant bug populations has also been documented in at least part of the Midsouth, until recently there have been no monitoring efforts in Tennessee. Therefore, an insecticide resistance monitoring program was instigated in 2006 for both bollworm and tarnished plant bug populations collected in West Tennessee. Monitoring resistance of key insect pests helps to document resistance and implement insect resistance management plans. Vial assays of adults are used in both cases. Populations of tarnished plant bugs were not tested in 2009, in part because excessive rainfall in September prevented their timely collection. Vial assays using 5 ug/vial cypermethrin, a synthetic pyrethroid, were again performed on bollworm moths in 2009. This represents a discriminating dose where 90% or higher of susceptible moths are expected to die after 24 h exposure. Fresh bollworm (i.e., corn earworm) moths were collected from traps that were baited with pheromone lure on the previous night. All moths were collected in Madison County at the West Tennessee Research and Education Center. For several years and as part of a cooperative effort, moths from the above tests have been submitted to scientists in Mississippi (X. Xxxxxx, X. Xxxxxxx) who are assaying moths using a technique that determines if the larval host was a C3 or C4 plant. These data are being collected to better understand the population dynamics of bollworm and determine the impact of host origin on resistance levels. C3 plants are broadleaves such as cotton and soybean. C4 plants are usually grasses, and presumably any bollworms testing positive for C4 plants developed on corn or sorghum because these are primary hosts during the time frame of moth trapping. Outcomes: 1277 moths were used in the vial tests that were done between 6 July and 21 September, 2009. Percent survival after 24 h was recorded for moths in treated and untreated vials (see figure below). The average, corrected percent survival of moths to the 5 ug/vial dose of cypermethrin was about 10%, similar to 2008 and less than observed in 2006 (16%) and 2007 (21%). These data indicate some level of resistance but not to the levels that result in field control insecticide failures when spraying pyrethroid insecticides f...
Resistance Monitoring. Insects are well known to develop resistance to insecticides. There is increasing documentation of bollworm resistance to pyrethroid insecticides in parts of the lower Midsouth. Although pyrethroid and acephate resistance in some tarnished plant bug populations has also been documented in at least parts the Midsouth, until recently there have been no monitoring efforts in Tennessee. Therefore, an insecticide resistance monitoring program was instigated in 2006 for both bollworm and tarnished plant bug populations collected in West Tennessee. Monitoring resistance of key insect pests helps to document resistance and implement insect resistance management plans. Vial assays of adults were used in both cases.

Related to Resistance Monitoring

  • Service Monitoring Customer gives express consent for Vodafone to monitor Customer’s use of the Service (and disclose and otherwise use the information obtained) only to: (a) the extent allowed by Applicable Law; (b) comply with Applicable Law; (c) protect the Network from misuse; (d) protect the integrity of the public internet and/or Vodafone’s systems and Networks; (e) the extent necessary to determine if Customer has breached any conditions or restrictions on use of the Service; (f) provide the Service; and/or (g) take other actions agreed or requested by Customer.

  • Program Monitoring The Contractor will make all records and documents required under this Agreement as outlined here, in OEC Policies and NHECC Policies available to the SRO or its designee, the SR Fiscal Officer or their designee and the OEC. Scheduled monitoring visits will take place twice a year. The SRO and OEC reserve the right to make unannounced visits.

  • Supply Chain Monitoring A copy of the supply chain monitoring process, which should include details of the process for monitoring the financial viability of the supply chain (including timing), together with any known risks to supply chain stability and material changes to the supply chain. This should include extracts from Board level meetings, risk registers etc where any of the above items have been discussed. Annex 1 1 Information from Contractors who are not required to submit form AR01 to Companies House

  • Compliance Monitoring Grantee must be subject to compliance monitoring during the period of performance in which funds are Expended and up to three years following the closeout of all funds. In order to assure that the program can be adequately monitored, the following is required of Grantee:

  • System Monitoring to ensure safe and continuous operation, the Customer must monitor key services and resource use as recommended by Deswik, and provide Deswik with details of monitoring and any relevant alerts as needed. Services to be monitors include, without limitation, disk space, CPU usage, memory usage, database connectivity, and network utilization.

  • Contract Monitoring The criminal background checks required by this rule shall be national in scope, and must be conducted at least once every three (3) years. Contractor shall make the criminal background checks required by Paragraph IV.G.1 available for inspection and copying by DRS personnel upon request of DRS.

  • Project Monitoring The Developer shall provide regular status reports to the NYISO in accordance with the monitoring requirements set forth in the Development Schedule, the Public Policy Transmission Planning Process Manual and Attachment Y of the OATT.

  • Call monitoring We may occasionally monitor and record calls made to or by us relating to customer services and telemarketing calls made by us, for the purpose of training and improving customer care services, including complaint handling. We and/or our suppliers may also record 999 and 112 calls.

  • Assistance and Cooperation After the Closing Date, each of Seller and Purchaser shall:

  • Performance Monitoring A. Performance Monitoring of Subrecipient by County, State of California and/or HUD shall consist of requested and/or required written reporting, as well as onsite monitoring by County, State of California or HUD representatives.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.