Results Presentation Sample Clauses

Results Presentation. The range of electric vehicles is typically presented as a bar diagram for different vehicle configurations. For hybrid vehicles, the results could be shown in a 3D-plot, with the different working points of the combustion motor as the second parameter axis.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Results Presentation. Considering the building automation is a multi-objective optimization prob- lem, then we present the DSE results in an nD plot, where n is the number of the optimization criteria. In our case study, we optimize the building automation against two optimization criteria, i.e.
Sample 1Sample 2
Results Presentation. The presentation for simple objective value would be a table or curve with a few significative simulations and showing the extremal objective value(s). For the case of a limit value is overun (such as maximal allowed speed, overun of train so positions overrunning, or collision with same), it could be interesting to show similar table or curve in the neighbourhood of this limit value. Finally, it should be interesting to show XY curve for showing trade off between two competitive objectives. (such as availability vs train trip delay).
Sample 1
Results Presentation. The result of the simulation should be presented in an interactive manner, where the company developers can select the parameter he/she want to evalu- ate for a speci c scenario. It should be possible to select several parameters, e.g. robot vehicle implement, wheel size, and sensory types. The result should be presented in a list and a graph so the user can see the how the result compares to each other. It should be possible to select the individual simulations to see a detailed description of the scenario.
Sample 1
Results Presentation. ‌ The results presentation is the result of two scripts, the ranking script is responsible for producing the raw ranking data and the graph that will be displayed (in png format). The output script is responsible for producing a static html le including the png graph and extracting the details of the ranked designs for a table, the results of which are shown in Figure 15. The page contains the information that would allow the user to determine which are the best designs, but while the graph highlights the best designs with di erent coloured points and the table lists all designs with their rank number, it is still a manual process to link the points on the graph with the rows in the table. It also does not lend itself to the identi cation of trends by, for example, highlighting all designs with a particular value of a design parameter. The page also presents all design results, even those with the very Figure 15: A page of DSE results high default values when an objective could not be computed, on the same graph, this has the e ect of distorting the results such that the real spread of results become obscured. The plans for Year 3 include making the page more dynamic to help identify trends and the position of results in objective space and also to lter the simulation results into the acceptable results, those that were evaluated but did not meet the objective constraints and those that could not be evaluated for some reason. Additionally to this, since DSE simulations are not run with either 3D or live stream output, it is desirable if a user will be able to relaunch a simulation from the results such that the simulated behaviour may be observed using these other features.
Sample 1
Results Presentation. The WRC results shall be posted on the WRC event website and sent to the IRF WRC Manager and Promotion & Development Manager within three days of the completion of the WRC in the format described in Appendix A. The event website, including the results, must be maintained for a minimum of five years after the completion of the WRC.
Sample 1
Results Presentation. The result of the simulation should be presented in an interactive manner, where the user can select the parameter he/she wants to see the results for. It should be possible to select several parameters, e.g. battery capacity and wheel size. Along with the parameters it should be possible to define the scenarios the user wants to compare, e.g. what is the optimal battery capacity and wheel size for the surface type and this crop type. The result should be presented in a list and a graph so the user can see the how the result compare to each other. It should be possible to select the indivual simulations to see a detailed description of the scenario.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Results Presentation

  • BID TABULATION AND RESULTS Bid tabulations shall be available thirty (30) days after opening on the Orange County website at: xxxx://xxxx.xxxx.xxx/orangebids/bidresults/results.asp or upon notice of intended action, whichever is sooner.

  • Justification and Anticipated Results The Privacy Act requires that each matching agreement specify the justification for the program and the anticipated results, including a specific estimate of any savings. 5 U.S.C. § 552a(o)(1)(B).

  • Dissemination of own Results 8.3.1.1 During the Project and for a period of 1 year after the end of the Project, the dissemination of own Results by one or several Parties including but not restricted to publications and presentations, shall be governed by the procedure of Article 29.1 of the Grant Agreement subject to the following provisions. Prior notice of any planned publication shall be given to the other Parties at least 45 calendar days before the publication. Any objection to the planned publication shall be made in accordance with the Grant Agreement in writing to the Coordinator and to the Party or Parties proposing the dissemination within 30 calendar days after receipt of the notice. If no objection is made within the time limit stated above, the publication is permitted.

  • ORAL PRESENTATIONS/INTERVIEWS In connection with any SOW RFP, Contractor and proposed employees, independent contractors or agents of Contractor may be required to make an oral presentation to State or Agency representatives. Significant representations made by a Contractor during the oral presentation shall be submitted in writing. All material representations acceptable to the State shall be incorporated in any applicable SOW Agreement. The Agency will notify Contractor of the time and place of oral presentations.

  • Evaluation Results A. Evaluation results shall be used:

  • Financial Condition There shall have been no material adverse change, as determined by Bank, in the financial condition or business of Borrower, nor any material decline, as determined by Bank, in the market value of any collateral required hereunder or a substantial or material portion of the assets of Borrower.

  • DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS The goal of this task is to collect operational data from the project, to analyze that data for economic and environmental impacts, and to include the data and analysis in the Final Report. Formulas will be provided for calculations. A Final Report data collection template will be provided by the Energy Commission. The Recipient shall: • Develop data collection test plan. • Troubleshoot any issues identified. • Collect data, information, and analysis and develop a Final Report which includes: o Total gross project costs. o Length of time from award of bus(es) to project completion. o Fuel usage before and after the project.

  • Quarterly Report 5.1 Upon request, the contractor shall provide to the Purchasing Agent a quarterly report, showing all purchases made under the terms and conditions of the contract.

  • Presentation for Scaling Purchaser shall present products so that they may be Scaled in an eco- nomical and safe manner. If prior to Scaling, Included Timber is to be mixed with other timber, Purchaser shall, prior to mixing, provide for distinguishing, by means ap- proved by Forest Service, each product included in this contract. Trees or pieces presented for Scaling that have not been bucked to separate material meeting minimum piece standards from material not meeting minimum piece standards due to diameter, shall be Scaled as though such bucking had been done. Deductions made for rot, check, or other defects re- sulting from abnormal delay in Scaling caused by Pur- chaser shall be recorded separately and charged to Xxx- ber Sale Account under B3.47. Any timber that has been removed from Sale Area during the period of this contract, but remains unscaled after Termination Date, shall be Scaled at the earliest rea- sonable date.

  • Annual Report Within 90 days after each April 15, starting in the year after the Closing Date, the Indenture Trustee will prepare and mail to each Noteholder a report dated as of April 15 of the applicable year that complies with Section 313(a) of the TIA, if the report is required under Section 313(a) of the TIA. The Indenture Trustee will also prepare and mail to the Noteholders any report required under Section 313(b) of the TIA. A report mailed to the Noteholders under this Section 7.4(a) will be mailed according to Section 313(c) of the TIA.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!