Review and Assess GIS Data Structure Sample Clauses

Review and Assess GIS Data Structure. Aspect GIS staff will review the data structure of the City’s stormwater GIS information and compare this data structure/content to the requirements of the 2019 NPDES Phase II Municipal Permit for Western Washington. Aspect GIS staff will also conduct up to three virtual workshop-meetings with key City staff to discuss program goals as they relate to stormwater data—and to the City’s existing GIS workflows and business systems. Aspect will produce a summary of this review and a corresponding table of recommended data collection and maintenance needs addressing permit requirements and program goals. Potential items to be considered include, but are not limited to: • 2019 NPDES Phase II Municipal Permit for Xxxxxx Washington stormwater GIS data requirements • GIS Database schema changes that support useful categorizing and symbolizing for City staff mapping and informational needs • Changes that are easy to complete and maintain • Data maintenance planning to keep information up-to-date • Data that supports field inspections • Other programmatic needs, such as source control and surface area treated by green stormwater infrastructure (GSI), as defined by the city Assumptions: • City will provide GIS data • Up to three one-hour meetings with up to two Aspect staff Deliverables: • A web-based summary presentation documenting the results of the assessment hosted on the Project Hub. • A table summarizing recommendations. Phase 2 – Data Migration Support Aspect staff will support the migration of existing GIS data to new, recommended data structures/schema. Aspect will use GIS tools to migrate datasets from one data system to another, to help ensure transfer fidelity and efficiency. Assumptions: • When inconsistent data exist and/or extents of different data on the same asset type overlap, one dataset will be chosen for the migration. • City staff will be asked to weigh in on critical translation/interpretation tasks in moving data from one format to another (e.g., updated codes/naming conventions for assets and infrastructure).
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Review and Assess GIS Data Structure

  • RECORDS, AUDIT ACCESS AND OPEN BOOK DATA 15.1 The Supplier shall keep and maintain, until the later of:

  • Screening and Assessment Grantee shall:

  • Project Monitoring Reporting and Evaluation The Recipient shall furnish to the Association each Project Report not later than forty-five (45) days after the end of each calendar semester, covering the calendar semester.

  • Project Monitoring Reporting Evaluation A. The Project Implementing Entity shall monitor and evaluate the progress of its activities under the Project and prepare Project Reports in accordance with the provisions of Section 5.08(b) of the General Conditions and on the basis of indicators agreed with the Bank. Each such report shall cover the period of one

  • AUDIT AND ACCESS TO RECORDS The State reserves the right to conduct a programmatic and financial audit of the project, and the State may withhold payment until the audit is satisfactorily completed. The Grantee will be required to maintain all pertinent records and evidence pertaining to this Agreement, including grant and any required matching funds, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and other procedures specified by the State. The State or any of its duly authorized representatives must have access, upon reasonable notice, to such books, records, documents, and other evidence for the purpose of inspection, audit, and copying. The Grantee will provide proper facilities for such access and inspection. All records must be maintained for a minimum of five years after the final payment has been issued to the Grantee by the State.

  • Exception Where Databases Contain Sufficient Information A Reporting Financial Institution is not required to perform the paper record search described in subparagraph D.2. of this section if the Reporting Financial Institution’s electronically searchable information includes the following:

  • Accessibility of Web-Based Information and Applications For State Agency Authorized User Acquisitions: Any web-based information and applications development, or programming delivered pursuant to the contract or procurement, will comply with New York State Enterprise IT Policy NYS-P08-005, Accessibility of Web-Based Information and Applications as follows: Any web-based information and applications development, or programming delivered pursuant to the contract or procurement, will comply with New York State Enterprise IT Policy NYS-P08- 005, Accessibility of Web-Based Information and Applications as such policy may be amended, modified or superseded, which requires that state agency web-based information and applications are accessible to persons with disabilities. Web-based information and applications must conform to New York State Enterprise IT Policy NYS-P08-005 as determined by quality assurance testing. Such quality assurance testing will be conducted by the State Agency Authorized User and the results of such testing must be satisfactory to the Authorized User before web-based information and applications will be considered a qualified deliverable under the contract or procurement.

  • Electronic and Information Resources Accessibility and Security Standards a. Applicability: The following Electronic and Information Resources (“EIR”) requirements apply to the Contract because the Grantee performs services that include EIR that the System Agency's employees are required or permitted to access or members of the public are required or permitted to access. This Section does not apply to incidental uses of EIR in the performance of the Agreement, unless the Parties agree that the EIR will become property of the State of Texas or will be used by HHSC’s clients or recipients after completion of the Agreement. Nothing in this section is intended to prescribe the use of particular designs or technologies or to prevent the use of alternative technologies, provided they result in substantially equivalent or greater access to and use of a Product.

  • NASPO ValuePoint Summary and Detailed Usage Reports In addition to other reports that may be required by this solicitation, the Contractor shall provide the following NASPO ValuePoint reports.

  • Updated Information Submission by Interconnection Customer The updated information submission by the Interconnection Customer, including manufacturer information, shall occur no later than one hundred eighty (180) Calendar Days prior to the Trial Operation. The Interconnection Customer shall submit a completed copy of the Electric Generating Unit data requirements contained in Appendix 1 to the LGIP. It shall also include any additional information provided to the Participating TO and the CAISO for the Interconnection Studies. Information in this submission shall be the most current Electric Generating Unit design or expected performance data. Information submitted for stability models shall be compatible with the Participating TO and CAISO standard models. If there is no compatible model, the Interconnection Customer will work with a consultant mutually agreed to by the Parties to develop and supply a standard model and associated information. If the Interconnection Customer's data is materially different from what was originally provided to the Participating TO and the CAISO for the Interconnection Studies, then the Participating TO and the CAISO will conduct appropriate studies pursuant to the LGIP to determine the impact on the Participating TO’s Transmission System and affected portions of the CAISO Controlled Grid based on the actual data submitted pursuant to this Article 24.3. The Interconnection Customer shall not begin Trial Operation until such studies are completed and all other requirements of this LGIA are satisfied.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.