Review and Selection Process The Project Narratives of SAMHSA applications are peer-reviewed according to the evaluation criteria listed above. Decisions to fund a grant are based on the strengths and weaknesses of the application as identified by peer reviewers. The results of the peer review are advisory in nature. The program office and approving official make the final determination for funding based on the following: • Individual awards over $250,000 are approved by the Center for Mental Health Services National Advisory Council; • Availability of funds; • Equitable distribution of awards in terms of geography (including urban, rural, and remote settings) and balance among populations of focus and program size; • Submission of any required documentation that must be submitted prior to making an award; and • SAMHSA is required to review and consider any information about your organization that is in the Federal Award Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS). In accordance with 45 CFR 75.212, SAMHSA reserves the right not to make an award to an entity if that entity does not meet the minimum qualification standards as described in section 75.205(a)(2). If SAMHSA chooses not to award a fundable application in accordance with 45 CFR 75.205(a)(2), SAMHSA must report that determination to the designated integrity and performance system accessible through the System for Award Management (XXX) [currently, FAPIIS]. You may review and comment on any information about your organization that a federal awarding agency previously entered. XXXXXX will consider your comments, in addition to other information in FAPIIS in making a judgment about your organization’s integrity, business ethics, and record of performance under federal awards when completing the review of risk posed as described in 45 CFR 75.205 HHS Awarding Agency Review of Risk by Applicants.
Document Inspection In accordance with section 216.1366, F.S., the Department is authorized to inspect the: (a) financial records, papers, and documents of the Contractor that are directly related to the performance of the Contract or the expenditure of state funds; and (b) programmatic records, papers, and documents of the Contractor which the Department determines are necessary to monitor the performance of the Contract or to ensure that the terms of the Contract are being met. The Contractor shall provide such records, papers, and documents requested by the Department within 10 Business Days after the request is made.
Review and Amendment 1. The Council for TRIPS shall review the implementation of this Agreement after the expiration of the transitional period referred to in paragraph 2 of Article 65. The Council shall, having regard to the experience gained in its implementation, review it two years after that date, and at identical intervals thereafter. The Council may also undertake reviews in the light of any relevant new developments which might warrant modification or amendment of this Agreement.
Independent Review and Inspection The Owner may undertake independent inspection of the installation of the Work. Such independent inspector shall operate on behalf of the Owner and shall act to protect the best interests of the Owner.
Review Rights The State and the U.S. Department of Transportation, when federal funds are involved, and any of their authorized representatives shall have the right at all reasonable times to review or otherwise evaluate the work performed hereunder and the premises in which it is being performed.
Inspection Checklist (check one) ☐ In order to avoid disagreements about the condition of the Premises, at the time of accepting possession of the Premises, Tenant will complete the Inspection Checklist incorporated herein by reference and attached hereto as Exhibit B and record any damage or deficiencies that exist at the commencement of the Term. Landlord will be liable for the cost of any cleaning or repair to correct damages found at the time of the inspection. Tenant will be liable for the cost of any cleaning and/or repair to correct damages found at the end of the Term if not recorded on the inspection checklist, normal wear and tear excepted. ☐ The Tenant is NOT required to complete an inspection checklist.
Review Documents The Architect/Engineer shall, at its expense, furnish and deliver to the Owner for Owner’s review, Refer to Exhibit C: Document Distribution Matrix for the required number of documents required for each review stage. The following Exhibits are fully incorporated into this Agreement by reference: EXHIBITS Ex A Personnel Titles and Hourly Rates Ex B BIM Execution Plan Ex C Document Distribution Matrix EXHIBIT A PERSONNEL TITLES AND HOURLY RATES The prime architectural or engineering firm for this project will assemble the following information from consulting team members associated with the project. The categories of personnel indicated should be edited to include only those expected to be actually working on this project. When preparing this schedule, you are expected to adhere to the position classifications and titles presented to the greatest extent possible. Additional consultant listings and/or position classifications may be added as needed or required by the project. UFirm/Position Classification UHourly Billing Rate Architecture – Huckabee Principal / Executive $250.00 Project Architect / Associate Principal $200.00 BIM Specialist $150.00 Project Leader $80.00 Project Engineer $200.00 Quality Control $100.00 Structural Leader $100.00 Engineer-in-Training $80.00 Intern / Draftsman $60.00 Administrative Staff $45.00 Urban Planner $150.00 Public Relations Consultant $150.00 Construction Observer $100.00 Design Architecture – Xxxxx Sports Principal $300.00 Senior Designer $200.00 Project Manager $160.00 Project Architect $130.00 Architect $110.00 Intern Architect $90.00 Interior Designer $100.00 MEP Engineering – Xxxxx DBR Partner $240.00 Project Manager $185.00 Senior Engineer $185.00 Senior Technology Designer $155.00 Engineer / Senior Designer $140.00 Senior Construction Administrator $140.00 Technology Designer $130.00 Commissioning Agent $130.00 Quality Assurance / Quality Control $130.00 Construction Administrator $110.00 Sustainability Advisor $110.00 Designer (M, E, P) $110.00 CADD Operator $65.00 Administrative Staff $60.00 Structural Engineering – JQ + Tsen Partner $240.00 Principal $210.00 Senior Project Manager $175.00 Engineering Technical Lead $190.00 Project Manager $155.00 Senior Project Engineer $135.00 Project Engineer $120.00 Senior Technician $110.00 Technician $90.00 Administrative Staff $75.00 Civil Engineering – Xxxxxxx Xxxx Principal $225.00 Associate Principal $200.00 Director $200.00 Senior Project Manager $150.00 Senior Project Coordinator $150.00 Project Manager $120.00 Project Coordinator $120.00 Project Engineer $95.00 Senior Technician $110.00 Technician $80.00 Drafter $75.00 Research Manager $80.00 Technical Assistant $50.00 Executive Assistant $85.00 Senior Administrative Assistant $80.00 Administrative Assistant $70.00 Expert Witness Testimony $350.00 Landscape Architecture – Xxxxxxx Xxxx Principal $225.00 Associate Principal $200.00 Director $200.00 Senior Project Manager $150.00 Project Manager $120.00 Project Landscape Architect $95.00 Landscape Designer $75.00 Drafter $75.00 Executive Assistant $85.00 Senior Administrative Assistant $80.00 Administrative Assistant $70.00 Expert Witness Testimony $350.00 Cost Consultant – Vermeleuns Principal $275.00 Associate Principal $245.00 Associate $215.00 Senior Project Manager $185.00 Senior Estimator $185.00 Estimator $125.00 Administrative Staff $125.00 Data/Telecommunications Consultant – Crux Technology + Security Design Project Principal $150.00 Project Manager $150.00 Quality Assurance $130.00 Design Support Services $130.00 Production / Drawing Support $90.00 Acoustical/Audio-Visual Consultant – BAi Principal $200.00 Technical Systems Specialist $150.00 Food Service Consultant – Xxxxx Design Solutions Project Administrator $175.00 Project Designer $155.00 Production Staff $125.00 Security Consultant – Crux Technology + Security Design Project Principal $150.00 Project Manager $150.00 Quality Assurance $130.00 Design Support Services $130.00 Production / Drawing Support $90.00 Fire & Life Safety Consultant – Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Director / Operation Manager $230.00 Senior Fire Protection Engineer $215.00 Senior Consultant $165.00 Consultant $150.00 Fire Protection Engineer $150.00 Associate $135.00 Roofing Consultant – Rooftech Expert Witness $250.00 Principal Engineer $150.00 Principal Architect $150.00 Senior Construction Consultant $150.00 Project Manager $150.00 Certified Infrared Themographer $150.00 Registered Roof Consultant $150.00 Laboratory Technician $125.00 CADD Designer I $115.00 CADD Designer II $95.00 Contract Administrator $100.00 Registered Roof Observer $75.00 Full-Time Registered Roof Observer $75.00 Clerical / Report Processor $60.00 EXHIBIT B BIM Execution Plan DEVELOPED BY (Name and Company) PROJECT INFORMATION The intent of this BIM Execution Plan is to provide a framework that will let the owner, design team, and contractor deploy building information modeling (BIM) technology and best practices on this project faster and more cost‐ effectively. If the delivery method is competitive sealed proposal then the contractor will be included in this Execution Plan at a later date. This plan delineates roles and responsibilities of each party, the detail and scope of information to be shared, relevant business processes and supporting software. To successfully implement Building Information Modeling (BIM) on a project, the project team has developed this detailed BIM Project Execution Plan. The BIM Project Execution Plan defines uses for BIM on the project (e.g. design authoring, cost estimating, and design coordination), along with a detailed design of the process for executing BIM throughout the project lifecycle. Project Name: Memorial Stadium Renovation and Expansion Project Number: 04-3176 Brief Project Description: Additional Project Information: Construction Delivery Method: Competitive Sealed Proposal (CSP) Project Schedule/Phases/Milestones: See Attached Include BIM milestones, pre‐design activities, major design reviews, stakeholder reviews, and any other major events which occur during the project lifecycle. Project Phase/Milestone Estimated Start Date Estimated Completion Date Project Stakeholders Involved Existing Documentation May 12, 2016 May 25, 2016 Huckabee Planning / Programming May 12,2016 May 24,2016 Huckabee/Xxxxx/Owner Schematic Design May 25, 2016 July 29, 2016 Design Team Design Development July 29, 2016 October 14, 2016 Design Team SD/DD Coordination September 28, 2016 October 6, 2016 Design Team/Owner Construction Documents October 17, 2016 January 16, 2017 Design team Facility Data Review XXX XXX TBD Construction May 26,2017 July 2018 GC/Design Team/Owner KEY PROJECT CONTACTS List of lead BIM contacts for each organization on the project. Additional contacts can be included later in the document. Organization Contact Name Role/Title Location Email Phone Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx Sports Xxxxx DBR JQ+Xxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxx (Civil) Xxxxxxx Xxxx (Landscape) Crux (data) Crux (security) XXX Xxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx Xxxx Xxxxxx Xxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxx Xxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Xxxx Xxxxxxxxxx Xxxx Xxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxx Chi Do Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Project Leader BIM Spec. Designer MEP Civil Landscape Tech Security Acoustical Food Service Fire/Life Safe Cost Est. Houston Houston Atlanta Houston Dallas Dallas Dallas Ft Worth Ft Worth Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxx S Xxxxxxx xxxxxxx@xxxxxxxx‐xxx.xxx xxxxxxx@huckabee‐xxx.xxx XXxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx XXxxxx@xxxxxx.xxx xxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx xxxxxxxxx@xxxx.xxx xxxxxxxxx@xxxx.xxx xxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx xxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx xxxxxx@xxxxxxxxx.xxx xxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx xxx@xxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx xxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx BIM PROCESSES AND COLLABORATION PROCEDURES Describe the collaboration strategies used for developing the BIMs for the following applicable processes. Identify project team participants for each. Existing Conditions – Huckabee-BIM Specialist-Xxxx Xxxxxx Upon delivery of existing documentation to Huckabee, the BIM specialist will construct a Revit model of the existing conditions, to the extent required for the completion of the project. Conditions will be field verified and the finished existing model will be delivered to Xxxxx for use as a design background. Design Authoring-Xxxxx-TBD Design Concept in Sketchup can begin based on approximations of existing conditions. From multiple design concepts, one will be chosen to carry into Schematic Design. Schematic Design will be based on actual existing conditions. The Schematic Design may combine the use of Revit and Sketchup to adequately convey the design intent while assuring accuracy and constructability Design Reviews-Owner-TBD The owner and Xxxxx will review the SD for design intent while Xxxxxxxx will review the SD with Xxxxx for adequacy of information to proceed into Design Development. The SD will be accurately scaled with appropriate consideration for Structural and Mechanical design before moving into Design Development. Space Tracking-Xxxxx-TBD/Huckabee-Project Leader-Xxxx Xxxxxx At the end of SD, upon transition to DD, and at the completion of DD, the model will be reviewed to assure continuing adherence to the space program for the project. Energy Analysis-Xxxxx DBR Daylighting Analysis-Xxxxx DBR Cost Estimation-Vermeulens 3D Coordination (design and construction)-Owner/Xxxxx/Huckabee Upon transition to DD, at the completion of DD, at 50% CD, and at any point a structural or mechanical issue impacts the design, the model will be reviewed to assure continuing adherence to the design intent. Model Updates during Construction Facilities Management Data Record Modeling Other (describe) Model Delivery Schedule, Application and File Exchange Type Document the information exchanges and file transfers that will occur on the project. Discipline BIM Use File Sender/Receiver One‐Time or Frequency Due Date or Start Date Model File Model Software Native File Type Version File Exchange Type Arch Existing documentation Huckabee Upon completion Revit V16 .rvt Arch‐ Design/Conceptual Xxxxx Every two weeks Sketchup Arch‐ Design/Schematic Xxxxx Every two weeks Sketchup Arch‐Design Development Huckabee Every week Revit BIM AND FACILITY DATA REQUIREMENT Describe the methods to be used to fulfill the data requirements described in the Facility Design Guidelines. BIM AND DATA QUALITY CONTROL Describe the strategy to control the quality of the model(s) and the checks to be performed to assure quality. Checks Definition Responsible Party Software Frequency Visual Check Ensure there are no unintended model components and the design intent has been followed Huckabee & Xxxxx Revit v2016 Daily Interference Check Detect problems in the model where two building components are clashing including soft and hard Huckabee Navisworks Bi‐weekly Standards Check Ensure that the BIM and CADD Standard have been followed (fonts, dimensions, line styles, levels/layers, etc.) Huckabee Revit v2016; Bluebeam Weekly Model Integrity Checks Describe the QC validation process used to ensure that the Project Facility Data set has no undefined, incorrectly defined or duplicated elements and the reporting process on non‐compliant elements and corrective action plans Huckabee Revit v2016 Weekly Other MODEL STRUCTURE File Naming Structure File Name Formatting <ProjectNumber>_<District>_<ProjectName>_<Discipline>_v16 Architectural Model 1754-01-01_TSU_MemorialStadiumReno_ARCH_v16 Structural Model 1754-01-01_TSU_MemorialStadiumReno_STRUC_v16 Mechanical Model 1754-01-01_TSU_MemorialStadiumReno_MECH_v16 Plumbing Model 1754-01-01_TSU_MemorialStadiumReno_PLUMB_v16 Fire Sprinkler Model 1754-01-01_TSU_MemorialStadiumReno_FIRE_v16 Electrical Model 1754-01-01_TSU_MemorialStadiumReno_ELEC_v16 Model Structure The single Architectural model will contain all architectural information, including interiors information as a part of the model. All other disciplines will be linked as separate models. The civil will be linked as a flattened CAD file, unless extreme site terrain warrants the development of a topographical surface. In that instance, the topography would be included in the architectural model. Measurement and Coordinate System BIM Project Location by Project Address through Internet Mapping Service. Shared Coordinates to be defined in architectural model and acquired by all consultant models. Model Accuracy and Tolerances Models should include all appropriate dimensioning as needed for design intent, analysis, and construction. Level of detail and included model elements are provided in the Information Exchange Worksheet. Phase Discipline Tolerance Design Documents ACCURATE TO +/‐ 1/8” OF ACTUAL SIZE AND LOCATION Shop Drawings ACCURATE TO +/‐ 1/8” OF ACTUAL SIZE AND LOCATION ACCURATE TO +/‐ [ # ] OF ACTUAL SIZE AND LOCATION PROJECT DELIVERABLES In this section, list the BIM deliverables for the project and the format in which the information will be delivered. BIM Submittal Item Stage Approximate Due Date Format Notes BIM models and CAD files coordination as required (max. weekly) .rvt v2016; .dwg v2016 ATTACHMENTS List any supporting information and attach. TAMUS/FPC Review Document Distribution Matrix
Contents of Personnel File A. Adverse statements prepared by the County shall not be included in an employee's official personnel file unless a copy is provided to the employee.
REVIEW OF CONTRACT DOCUMENTS 4.2.1 The Contractor shall carefully study and compare the Contract Documents and shall immediately report in writing to the Architect and the State any error, inconsistency or omission he may discover. The Contractor shall not be liable to the State or the Architect for any damage resulting from any such errors, inconsistencies or omissions in the Contract Documents. The Contractor shall perform no portion of the Work at any time without Contract Documents or, where required, approved Shop Drawings, Product Data or Samples for such portion of the Work.
Review of Personnel File Upon written authority from an employee, OC shall permit the President of the Union or their designate to review that employee's personnel file in the office in which the file is normally kept in order to facilitate the proper investigation of a grievance.
