Common use of Review Levels Clause in Contracts

Review Levels. Each faculty candidate for promotion and/or tenure, whether by the standard requirements or the exceptions to same or the special provisions, shall be reviewed by a Department Personnel Committee, a College Personnel Committee, the College Xxxx, and the University Rank and Tenure Committee. A faculty member of the College of Education shall provide notification to the Xxxx of the College, who shall forward all materials to the Chair of the appropriate Personnel Committee of the College of Education All required materials filed by a candidate for promotion and/or tenure, all recommendations from each level of review (both positive and negative) plus written responses (if any) of the candidate to reviews made at the levels of the department, college, and xxxx shall be forwarded to all subsequent review levels. Recommendations which are made at any level shall not be binding at any other level. Recommendations for tenure and for each rank of promotion shall be made as hereinafter provided. a. Each reviewing authority develops an alphabetical list of individuals who are recommended for tenure, including those individuals who are simultaneously evaluated for both promotion and tenure. (Applicants for simultaneous evaluation for promotion and tenure shall not be evaluated separately for tenure or for promotion). b. Each reviewing authority develops an alphabetical list of individuals who are recommended for each rank of promotion. Candidates who are simultaneously evaluated for both promotion and tenure shall appear on both tenure and promotion lists and shall be listed in alphabetical order. The results of each reviewing authority’s vote count will be forwarded to the subsequent levels of review. c. Each reviewing authority develops an alphabetical list of individuals who are not recommended for tenure and an alphabetical list of individuals who are not recommended for promotion (by level of requested promotion). Unrecommended candidates who are simultaneously evaluated for both promotion and tenure shall appear on both promotion and tenure listings of unrecommended individuals. The phrase "review" as used in this Article refers to a process which leads to a positive or negative recommendation; however, it is understood that the Department/College/Library committees, Deans/Director and the University Rank and Tenure Committee shall submit written reasons for their respective decisions whether positive or negative. d. All decisions of Committees in this process4 shall be made by vote of their members and all votes shall be by a simple majority of those committee members present and voting. Positive recommendations require a positive majority vote equal in number to a majority of the Committee members present and voting. e. Committees may make reasonable procedural rules not inconsistent with this Agreement. 4 and the Salary Review Process.

Review Levels. Each faculty candidate for promotion and/or tenure, whether by the standard requirements or the exceptions to same or the special provisions, shall be reviewed by a Department Personnel Committee, a College Personnel Committee, the College Xxxx, and the University Rank and Tenure Committee. DocuSign Envelope ID: 46917469-4676-4CEF-85A2-BAE71CCBECE1 DocuSign Envelope ID: 2E84AD11-7BE4-4203-8004-8334FF2AC26C A faculty member of the College of Education shall provide notification to the Xxxx of the College, who shall forward all materials to the Chair of the appropriate Personnel Committee of the College of Education All required materials filed by a candidate for promotion and/or tenure, all recommendations from each level of review (both positive and negative) plus written responses (if any) of the candidate to reviews made at the levels of the department, college, and xxxx shall be forwarded to all subsequent review levels. Recommendations which are made at any level shall not be binding at any other level. Recommendations for tenure and for each rank of promotion shall be made as hereinafter provided. a. Each reviewing authority develops an alphabetical list of individuals who are recommended for tenure, including those individuals who are simultaneously evaluated for both promotion and tenure. (Applicants for simultaneous evaluation for promotion and tenure shall not be evaluated separately for tenure or for promotion). b. Each reviewing authority develops an alphabetical list of individuals who are recommended for each rank of promotion. Candidates who are simultaneously evaluated for both promotion and tenure shall appear on both tenure and promotion lists and shall be listed in alphabetical order. The results of each reviewing authority’s vote count will be forwarded to the subsequent levels of review. c. Each reviewing authority develops an alphabetical list of individuals who are not recommended for tenure and an alphabetical list of individuals who are not recommended for promotion (by level of requested promotion). Unrecommended candidates who are simultaneously evaluated for both promotion and tenure shall appear on both promotion and tenure listings of unrecommended individuals. The phrase "review" as used in this Article refers to a process which leads to a positive or negative recommendation; however, it is understood that the Department/College/Library committees, Deans/Director and the University Rank and Tenure Committee shall submit written reasons for their respective decisions whether positive or negative. d. All decisions of Committees in this process4 shall be made by vote of their members and all votes shall be by a simple majority of those committee members present and voting. Positive recommendations require a positive majority vote equal in number to a majority of the Committee members present and voting. e. Committees may make reasonable procedural rules not inconsistent with this Agreement. 4 and the Salary Review Process.. DocuSign Envelope ID: 46917469-4676-4CEF-85A2-BAE71CCBECE1 DocuSign Envelope ID: 2E84AD11-7BE4-4203-8004-8334FF2AC26C

Review Levels. Each faculty candidate for promotion and/or tenure, whether by the standard requirements or the exceptions to same or the special provisions, shall be reviewed by a Department Personnel Committee, a College Personnel Committee, the College Xxxx, and the University Rank and Tenure Committee. A faculty member of the College Graduate School of Education shall provide notification to the Xxxx of the College, who shall forward all materials to the Chair Chairperson of the appropriate Personnel Committee of the College Graduate School of Education All required materials filed by a candidate for promotion and/or tenure, all recommendations from each level of review (both positive and negative) plus written responses (if any) of the candidate to reviews made at the levels of the department, college, and xxxx shall be forwarded to all subsequent review levels. Recommendations which are made at any level shall not be binding at any other level. Recommendations for tenure and for each rank of promotion shall be made as hereinafter provided. a. Each reviewing authority develops an alphabetical list of individuals who are recommended for tenure, including those individuals who are simultaneously evaluated for both promotion and tenure. (Applicants for simultaneous evaluation for promotion and tenure shall not be evaluated separately for tenure or for promotion). b. Each reviewing authority develops an alphabetical list of individuals who are recommended for each rank of promotion. Candidates who are simultaneously evaluated for both promotion and tenure shall appear on both tenure and promotion lists and shall be listed in alphabetical order. The results of each reviewing authority’s vote count will be forwarded to the subsequent levels of review. c. Each reviewing authority develops an alphabetical list of individuals who are not recommended for tenure and an alphabetical list of individuals who are not recommended for promotion (by level of requested promotion). Unrecommended candidates who are simultaneously evaluated for both promotion and tenure shall appear on both promotion and tenure listings of unrecommended individuals. The phrase "review" as used in this Article refers to a process which leads to a positive or negative recommendation; however, it is understood that the Department/College/Library committees, Deans/Director and the University Rank and Tenure Committee shall submit written reasons for their respective decisions whether positive or negative. d. All decisions of Committees in this process4 shall be made by vote of their members and all votes shall be by a simple majority of those committee members present and voting. Positive recommendations require a positive majority vote equal in number to a majority of the Committee members present and voting. e. Committees may make reasonable procedural rules not inconsistent with this Agreement. 4 and the Salary Review Process.