Review of Audits Sample Clauses

Review of Audits. Audit organizations and officials from the Government of the United States, including the Comptroller General of the United States and his duly authorized representatives, shall provide the Government of the Federated States of Micronesia with at least 45 days to review and comment on draft audit reports prior to the release of the reports. The comments of the Government of the Federated States of Micronesia shall be included, in full, in the final audit reports. Should a draft audit report be revised based on the comments of the Government of the Federated States of Micronesia, the Government of the Federated States of Micronesia shall have an additional period to review and comment on the report prior to its release.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Review of Audits. Audit organizations and officials from the Government of the United States, including the Comptroller General of the United States and his duly authorized representatives, shall provide the Government of the Republic of the Xxxxxxxx Islands with at least 45 days to review and comment on draft audit reports prior to the release of the reports. The comments of the Government of the Republic of the Xxxxxxxx Islands shall be included, in full, in the final audit reports. Should a draft audit report be revised based on the comments of the Government of the Republic of the Xxxxxxxx Islands, the Government of the Republic of the Xxxxxxxx Islands shall have an additional period to review and comment on the report prior to its release.
Sample 1Sample 2
Review of Audits. Reliance and Vendor shall meet to review each audit report promptly after the issuance thereof. Vendor will respond to each audit report in writing within twenty (20) days from receipt of such report, unless a shorter time is specified in a report by any external auditor. Reliance and Vendor shall develop and agree upon an action plan to promptly address and resolve any deficiencies, concerns and/or recommendations in such audit report and Vendor, at its own expense, shall undertake remedial action in accordance with such action plan.
Sample 1Sample 2
Review of Audits. NMS shall have the opportunity, prior to -------------------- the release of any audit report, to review a draft of such report and to include in the report its responses to issues raised by the report.
Sample 1Sample 2
Review of Audits. Provider and T-Mobile will meet to review each audit report generated as a result of this Section promptly after the issuance thereof. Provider will at its sole cost and expense correct any deficiency or other problem found by an audit that is within the scope of such audit as it relates to the Services and Deliverables as provided in Section 12.2(d) (Corrections).
Sample 1

Related to Review of Audits

  • Review Scope The parties confirm that the Asset Representations Review is not responsible for (a) reviewing the Receivables for compliance with the representations and warranties under the Transaction Documents, except as described in this Agreement or (b) determining whether noncompliance with the representations and warranties constitutes a breach of the Eligibility Representations. For the avoidance of doubt, the parties confirm that the review is not designed to determine why an Obligor is delinquent or the creditworthiness of the Obligor, either at the time of any Asset Review or at the time of origination of the related Receivable. Further, the Asset Review is not designed to establish cause, materiality or recourse for any Test Fail (as defined in Section 3.05).

  • Audits No more than once a year, or following unauthorized access, upon receipt of a written request from the LEA with at least ten (10) business days’ notice and upon the execution of an appropriate confidentiality agreement, the Provider will allow the LEA to audit the security and privacy measures that are in place to ensure protection of Student Data or any portion thereof as it pertains to the delivery of services to the LEA . The Provider will cooperate reasonably with the LEA and any local, state, or federal agency with oversight authority or jurisdiction in connection with any audit or investigation of the Provider and/or delivery of Services to students and/or LEA, and shall provide reasonable access to the Provider’s facilities, staff, agents and XXX’s Student Data and all records pertaining to the Provider, LEA and delivery of Services to the LEA. Failure to reasonably cooperate shall be deemed a material breach of the DPA.

  • Reviews (a) During the term of this Agreement and for 7 years after the term of this Agreement, the HSP agrees that the LHIN or its authorized representatives may conduct a Review of the HSP to confirm the HSP’s fulfillment of its obligations under this Agreement. For these purposes the LHIN or its authorized representatives may, upon 24 hours’ Notice to the HSP and during normal business hours enter the HSP’s premises to:

  • Delegation of Authority to Officers The Member may designate one or more Persons as officers of the Company. The officers shall have the authority to act for and bind the Company to the extent of the authority granted to them in resolutions adopted by the Member on behalf of the Company. The officers of the Company may include a president, vice presidents, a secretary, a treasurer, and such other officers as the Member deems appropriate. The officers of the Company will be entitled to such compensation for their services as the Member may determine from time to time.

  • Review Procedure If the Plan Administrator denies part or all of the claim, the claimant shall have the opportunity for a full and fair review by the Plan Administrator of the denial, as follows:

  • Review The practitioner reviews the treatment plan and discusses, when appropriate, case circumstances and management options with the attending (or referring) physician. The reviewer consults with the requesting physician when more clarity is needed to make an informed coverage decision. The reviewer may consult with board certified physicians from appropriate specialty areas to assist in making determinations of coverage and/or appropriateness. All such consultations will be documented in the review text. If the reviewer determines that the admission, continued stay or service requested is not a covered service, a notice of non-coverage is issued. Only a physician, behavioral health practitioner (such as a psychiatrist, doctoral-level clinical psychologist, certified addiction medicine specialist), dentist or pharmacist who has the clinical expertise appropriate to the request under review with an unrestricted license may deny coverage based on medical necessity.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!