Review of denial Sample Clauses

Review of denial. (a) The health professional, miner, or designated representative may refer the written denial to MSHA for review. The request for review must include a copy of— (1) The request for disclosure of the identity of the trade secret chemical, (2) The confidentiality agreement, and (3) The operator’s written denial. (b) If MSHA determines that the identity of the trade secret chemical should have been disclosed, the oper- ator will be subject to citation by MSHA. (c) If MSHA determines that the con- fidentiality agreement would not suffi- ciently protect against unauthorized disclosure of the trade secret, MSHA may impose additional conditions to ensure that the occupational health services are provided without an undue risk of harm to the operator. (d) If the operator contests a citation for a failure to release the identity of a trade secret chemical, the matter will be adjudicated by the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission. The Administrative Law Judge may re- view the citation and supporting docu- mentation ‘‘in camera’’ or issue appro- priate orders to protect the trade se- cret.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (10)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Review of denial. Upon denial of a claim, in whole or in part, a Claimant or his or her duly authorized representative will have the right to submit a written request to the Plan Administrator for a full and fair review of the denied claim by filing a written notice of appeal with the Plan Administrator within sixty (60) days of the receipt by the Claimant of written notice of the denial of the claim. A Claimant or the Claimant’s authorized representative will have, upon request and free of charge, reasonable access to, and copies of, all documents, records, and other information relevant to the Claimant’s claim for benefits and may submit issues and comments in writing. The review will take into account all comments, documents, records, and other information submitted by the Claimant relating to the claim, without regard to whether such information was submitted or considered in the initial benefit determination. If the Claimant fails to file a request for review within sixty (60) days of the denial notification, the claim will be deemed abandoned and the Claimant precluded from reasserting it. If the Claimant does file a request for review, his or her request must include a description of the issues and evidence he or she deems relevant. Failure to raise issues or present evidence on review will preclude those issues or evidence from being presented in any subsequent proceeding or judicial review of the claim.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
Review of denial. (a) The health professional, miner, or designated representative may refer the written denial to MSHA for review. The request for review must include a copy of— (1) The request for disclosure of the identity of the trade secret chemical, (2) The confidentiality agreement, and (3) The operator’s written denial. (b) If MSHA determines that the identity of the trade secret chemical should have been disclosed, the oper- ator will be subject to citation by MSHA. (c) If MSHA determines that the con- fidentiality agreement would not suffi- ciently protect against unauthorized disclosure of the trade secret, MSHA may impose additional conditions to ensure that the occupational health services are provided without an undue risk of harm to the operator. (d) If the operator contests a citation for a failure to release the identity of a trade secret chemical, the matter will be adjudicated by the Federal Mine Safety and Health Review Commission. The Administrative Law Judge may re- view the citation and supporting docu- mentation ‘‘in camera’’ or issue appro- priate orders to protect the trade se- cret. A hazardous chemical is exempt from this part under the conditions de- scribed in Table 47.91 as follows: TABLE 47.91—CHEMICALS AND PRODUCTS EXEMPT FROM THIS HAZCOM STANDARD Exemption Conditions for exemption Article ...................................................................... If, under normal conditions of use, it— (1) Releases no more than insignificant amounts of a hazardous chemical, and TABLE 47.91—CHEMICALS AND PRODUCTS EXEMPT FROM THIS HAZCOM STANDARD—Continued
Sample 1Sample 2
Review of denial. If the borrower was not delinquent in any principal or interest payment under the loan at the time of such action and the borrower’s request to have the loan placed back into ac- crual status is denied, the borrower may ob- tain a review of such denial before the appro- priate credit review committee under section 2202 of this title.
Sample 1Sample 2
Review of denial. The Administrator shall make a decision on review of a denied claim within 60 days after receipt of the request for review, taking into account all comments, documents, records, and other information submitted by the claimant relating to the claim, without regard to whether such information was submitted or considered in the initial benefit determination. The decision on review shall be deemed final. The Administrator’s decision on review shall be in writing, setting forth, in a manner calculated to be understood by the claimant the following: (a) the specific reason(s) for the final decision; (b) specific reference(s) to the pertinent provisions of the Plan on which the final decision is based; (c) a statement that the claimant is entitled to receive, upon request and free of charge, reasonable access to, and copies of, all documents, records and other information relevant to his/her claim; and (d) a statement describing any voluntary appeal procedures offered by the Plan and the claimant’s right to bring an action under Section 502(a) of ERISA. The Administrator shall, upon request, provide a claimant whose claim is denied any information that the Plan generated or obtained in the process of making the particular determination and must specifically identify to the claimant any internal rules, guidelines, or protocols that served as the basis for the adverse determination.
Sample 1
Review of denial. If the claim has been denied, the Employee (or his beneficiary) may request a review of the denial. The Employee (or his beneficiary) has 60 days after receipt of the written notice of denial to request a review. This request must be in writing and may be made to the Plan Administrator. If the Employee (or his beneficiary) wishes, the Employee (or his benficiary), or the representative thereof, may also review the plan documents, and submit issues and comments supporting the claim, in writing, to the Plan Administrator. A review of the denial should be made in writing by the Plan Administrator within 60 days (see the “NOTE” below) after the request is received. The decision should:
Sample 1
Review of denial. Upon denial of a claim, in whole or in part, a claimant may request a full and fair review of the denied claim by filing a written notice of appeal with the Committee. The review must be requested in writing within 60 days after the date that the claimant received the notice of the denial of his claim. The claimant will have, upon request and free of charge, reasonable access to, and copies of, all documents, records, and other information relevant to the claimant’s claim for benefits. The review will take into account all comments, documents, records, and other information submitted by the claimant relating to the claim, without regard to whether such information was submitted or considered in the initial benefit determination. If the claimant fails to file a request for review within 60 days of the denial notification, the claim will be deemed abandoned and the claimant will be precluded from reasserting it. If the claimant does file a request for review, his request must include a description of the issues and evidence he deems relevant. Failure to raise issues or present evidence on review will preclude those issues or evidence from being presented in any subsequent proceeding or judicial review of the claim.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Review of denial. Upon denial of a claim, in whole or in part, a Claimant or his or her duly authorized representative will have the right to submit a written request to the Plan Administrator for a full and fair review of the denied claim by filing a written notice of appeal with the Plan Administrator within sixty (60) days of the receipt by the Claimant of written notice of the denial of the claim. A Claimant or the Claimant’s authorized representative will have, upon request and free of charge, reasonable access to, and copies of, all documents, records, and other information relevant to the Claimant’s claim for benefits and may submit issues and comments in writing. The review will take into account all comments, documents, records, and other information submitted by the Claimant relating to the claim, without regard to whether such information was submitted or considered in the initial benefit determination.
Sample 1

Related to Review of denial

  • Review of Decision Within sixty (60) days after the Secretary’s receipt of a request for review, he or she will review the Company’s determination. After considering all materials presented by the Claimant, the Secretary will render a written opinion, written in a manner calculated to be understood by the Claimant, setting forth the specific reasons for the decision and containing specific references to the pertinent provisions of this Agreement on which the decision is based. If special circumstances require that the sixty (60) day time period be extended, the Secretary will so notify the Claimant and will render the decision as soon as possible, but no later than one hundred twenty (120) days after receipt of the request for review.

  • Review and Appeal 1. Each Party shall ensure that the importers in its territory have access to administrative review within the customs administration that issued the decision subject to review or, where applicable, the higher authority supervising the administration and/or judicial review of the determination taken at the final level of administrative review, in accordance with the Party's domestic law. 2. The decision on appeal shall be given to the appellant and the reasons for such decision shall be provided in writing. 3. The level of administrative review may include any authority supervising the customs administration of a Party.

  • Review of Agreement Each party acknowledges that it has had time to review this agreement and, as desired, consult with counsel. In the interpretation of this agreement, no adverse presumption shall be made against any party on the basis that it has prepared, or participated in the preparation of, this agreement.

  • REVIEW OF CONTRACT DOCUMENTS 4.2.1 The Contractor shall carefully study and compare the Contract Documents and shall immediately report in writing to the Architect and the State any error, inconsistency or omission he may discover. The Contractor shall not be liable to the State or the Architect for any damage resulting from any such errors, inconsistencies or omissions in the Contract Documents. The

  • Review Procedure If the Plan Administrator denies part or all of the claim, the claimant shall have the opportunity for a full and fair review by the Plan Administrator of the denial, as follows:

  • Completion of Review for Certain Review Receivables Following the delivery of the list of the Review Receivables and before the delivery of the Review Report by the Asset Representations Reviewer, the Servicer may notify the Asset Representations Reviewer if a Review Receivable is paid in full by the Obligor or purchased from the Issuer in accordance with the terms of the Basic Documents. On receipt of such notice, the Asset Representations Reviewer will immediately terminate all Tests of the related Review Receivable, and the Review of such Review Receivables will be considered complete (a “Test Complete”). In this case, the related Review Report will indicate a Test Complete for such Review Receivable and the related reason.

  • ADB’s Review of Procurement Decisions 11. All contracts procured under international competitive bidding procedures and contracts for consulting services shall be subject to prior review by ADB, unless otherwise agreed between the Borrower and ADB and set forth in the Procurement Plan.

  • Review of assessment The assessment of the applicable percentage should be subject to annual review or earlier on the basis of a reasonable request for such a review. The process of review shall be in accordance with the procedures for assessing capacity under the Supported Wage System.

  • Review Protocol A narrative description of how the Claims Review was conducted and what was evaluated.

  • Review Scope The parties confirm that the Asset Representations Review is not responsible for (a) reviewing the Receivables for compliance with the representations and warranties under the Transaction Documents, except as described in this Agreement or (b) determining whether noncompliance with the representations and warranties constitutes a breach of the Eligibility Representations. For the avoidance of doubt, the parties confirm that the review is not designed to determine why an Obligor is delinquent or the creditworthiness of the Obligor, either at the time of any Asset Review or at the time of origination of the related Receivable. Further, the Asset Review is not designed to establish cause, materiality or recourse for any Test Fail (as defined in Section 3.05).

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!