Common use of Review of Disputed Position Classification Decisions Clause in Contracts

Review of Disputed Position Classification Decisions. ‌ A. If the Superior Court does not respond at the end of the appropriate time period as specified in Section 3., Step 4 of this Article or OCEA does not agree with a position classification decision as approved by the Superior Court after the steps in Section 2. or 3. of this Article have been followed, the issue may be presented to a classification consultant for advisory review. Other provisions notwithstanding, no more than five (5) positions may be referred to a consultant per fiscal year except that any maintenance study done by a consultant shall not be included. B. The consultant's review shall be documented on forms supplied by the Superior Court and used by the Superior Court for documenting its classification decisions. C. The consultant shall have access to the organizational and classification files of the Superior Court Human Resources Department and shall have the right to conduct the classification study in the manner the consultant deems most appropriate. D. Any salary change for any employee resulting from a consultant's advisory recommendation shall be effective no sooner than the beginning of the pay period following the decision at Step 4 of the procedure described in Section 3., above. E. A consultant shall be chosen who has experience in conducting position classification analysis for local governmental agencies. The consultant will be chosen by a committee with an equal number of Superior Court and OCEA members. The cost of the consultant shall be shared equally by the Superior Court and OCEA.

Review of Disputed Position Classification Decisions. ‌ A. If the Superior Court does not respond at the end of the appropriate time period as specified in Section 3., Step 4 of this Article or OCEA does not agree with a position classification decision as approved by the Superior Court after the steps in Section 2. or 3. of this Article have been followed, the issue may be presented to a classification consultant for advisory review. Other provisions notwithstanding, no more than five (5) positions may be referred to a consultant per fiscal year except that any maintenance study done by a consultant shall not be included. B. The consultant's review shall be documented on forms supplied by the Superior Court and used by the Superior Court for documenting its classification decisions. C. The consultant shall have access to the organizational and classification files of the Superior Court Human Resources Department and shall have the right to conduct the classification study in the manner the consultant deems most appropriate. D. Any salary change for any employee resulting from a consultant's advisory recommendation shall be effective no sooner than the beginning of the pay period following the decision at Step 4 of the procedure described in Section 3., above. E. A consultant shall be chosen who has experience in conducting position classification analysis for local governmental agencies. The consultant will be chosen by a committee with an equal number of Superior Court and OCEA members. The cost of the consultant shall be shared equally by the Superior Court and OCEA.

Review of Disputed Position Classification Decisions. ‌ A. If the Superior Court does not respond at the end of the appropriate time period as specified in Section 3., Step 4 of this Article or OCEA does not agree with a position classification decision as approved by the Superior Court after the steps in Section 2. or 3. of this Article have been followed, the issue may be presented to a classification consultant for advisory review. Other provisions notwithstanding, no more than five fifty (550) positions may be referred to a consultant per fiscal year except that any maintenance study done by a consultant shall not be included. B. The consultant's review shall be documented on forms supplied by the Superior Court and used by the Superior Court for documenting its classification decisions. C. The consultant shall have access to the organizational and classification files of the Superior Court Human Resources Department and shall have the right to conduct the classification study in the manner the consultant deems most appropriate. D. Any salary change for any employee resulting from a consultant's advisory recommendation shall be effective no sooner than the beginning of the pay period following the decision at Step 4 of the procedure described in Section 3., above. E. A consultant shall be chosen who has experience in conducting position classification analysis for local governmental agencies. The consultant will be chosen by a committee with an equal number of Superior Court and OCEA members. The cost of the consultant shall be shared equally by the Superior Court and OCEA.

Review of Disputed Position Classification Decisions. ‌ A. If the Superior Court does not respond at the end of the appropriate time period as specified in Section 3., Step 4 of this Article or OCEA does not agree with a position classification decision as approved by the Superior Court after the steps in Section 2. or 3. of this Article have been followed, the issue may be presented to a classification consultant for advisory review. Other provisions notwithstanding, no more than five fifty (550) positions may be referred to a consultant per fiscal year except that any maintenance study done by a consultant shall not be included. B. The consultant's review shall be documented on forms supplied by the Superior Court and used by the Superior Court for documenting its classification decisions. C. The consultant shall have access to the organizational and classification files of the Superior Court Human Resources Department and shall have the right to conduct the classification study in the manner the consultant deems most appropriate. D. Any salary change for any employee resulting from a consultant's advisory recommendation shall be effective no sooner than the beginning of the pay period following the decision at Step 4 of the procedure described in Section 3., above. E. A consultant shall be chosen who has experience in conducting position classification analysis for local governmental agencies. The consultant will be chosen by a committee with an equal number of Superior Court and OCEA members. The cost of the consultant shall be shared equally by the Superior Court and OCEA.