Reviews of Non-Tenure Track Instructional and Research Faculty. (a) The Faculty Senate is responsible for the development of guidelines governing the evaluation of non- tenure track faculty, including evaluations that occur prior to, at the time of, and following continuous appointment. Each Department/Academic Unit shall establish and maintain guidelines for review of non-tenure track instructional and research faculty bargaining unit members that are consistent with guidelines developed by the Faculty Senate. Nothing in this provision affects or alters the Association’s ability to file a grievance, as provided in Article 28 that alleges a violation of such guidelines. (b) The guidelines must, at a minimum: a. Be in writing and be made available to members; b. Require each department to identify the committee(s) responsible for the evaluations; c. Establish job-relevant evaluation criteria and require the criteria to be in writing; d. Provide that the results of the review be in writing and provided to the member; e. Provide that the member is entitled to meet with the reviewers; f. Provide that the member is able to respond to the review by submitting a statement or comments, which shall be attached to the review; g. Provide that the member may submit relevant materials to the reviewers; h. Provide that the member may request a review if one has not been provided within the time period provided for by the guidelines; i. Provide that the member is to have reasonable notice of the evaluation; and j. In a department with more than one non-tenure track faculty member, provide that at least one non-tenure track faculty member will be on the review committee.
Appears in 8 contracts
Samples: Collective Bargaining Agreement, Collective Bargaining Agreement, Collective Bargaining Agreement
Reviews of Non-Tenure Track Instructional and Research Faculty. (a) The Faculty Senate is responsible for the development of guidelines governing the evaluation of non- tenure track faculty, including evaluations that occur prior to, at the time of, and following continuous appointment. Each Department/Academic Unit shall establish and maintain guidelines for review of non-tenure track instructional and research faculty bargaining unit members that are consistent with guidelines developed by the Faculty Senatepolicy and procedures regarding tenure, promotions and merit increases referenced in Article 14. Nothing in this provision affects or alters the Association’s ability to file a grievance, as provided in Article 28 28, that alleges a violation of such guidelines.
(b) The guidelines adopted by each Department/Academic Unit must, at a minimum:
a. Be in writing and be made available to members;
b. Require each department to identify the committee(s) responsible for the evaluations;
c. Establish job-relevant evaluation criteria and require the criteria to be in writing;
d. c. Provide that the results of the review be in writing and provided to the member;
e. d. Provide that the member is entitled to meet with the reviewers;
f. e. Provide that the member is able to respond to the review by submitting a statement or comments, which shall be attached to the review;
g. f. Provide that the member may submit relevant materials to the reviewers;
h. g. Provide that the member may request a review if one has not been provided within the time period provided for by the guidelines;
i. h. Provide that the member is to have reasonable notice of the evaluation; and
j. i. In a department with more than one non-tenure track faculty member, provide that at least one non-tenure track faculty member will be on the review committee.
(c) The University, at its discretion, may offer any non-tenure track faculty member a multi-year appointment. Xxxxx-funded non-tenure track research faculty members may receive contracts that run the length of the grant, up to three (3) years, as allowable by Administrative Rules and OUS policy, with Presidential approval.
Appears in 3 contracts
Samples: Collective Bargaining Agreement, Collective Bargaining Agreement, Collective Bargaining Agreement
Reviews of Non-Tenure Track Instructional and Research Faculty. (a) The Faculty Senate is responsible for the development of guidelines governing the evaluation of non- non-tenure track faculty, including evaluations that occur prior to, at the time of, and following continuous appointment. Each Department/Academic Unit shall establish and maintain guidelines for review of non-tenure track instructional and research faculty bargaining unit members that are consistent with guidelines developed by the Faculty Senate. Nothing in this provision affects or alters the Association’s ability to file a grievance, as provided in Article 28 that alleges a violation of such guidelines.
(b) The guidelines must, at a minimum:
a. 1. Be in writing and be made available to members;
b. 2. Require each department to identify the committee(s) responsible for the evaluations;
c. 3. Establish job-relevant evaluation criteria and require the criteria to be in writing;
d. 4. Provide that the results of the review be in writing and provided to the member;
e. 5. Provide that the member is entitled to meet with the reviewers;
f. 6. Provide that the member is able to respond to the review by submitting a statement or comments, which shall be attached to the review;
g. 7. Provide that the member may submit relevant materials to the reviewers;
h. 8. Provide that the member may request a review if one has not been provided within the time period provided for by the guidelines;
i. 9. Provide that the member is to have reasonable notice of the evaluation; and
j. 10. In a department with more than one non-tenure track faculty member, provide that at least one non-tenure track faculty member will be on the review committee.
(c) (c) Timing for Reviews of Non-Tenure Track Research Faculty members (NTTF-R)
1. Promotional reviews of NTTF-R members may occur twice during the academic or calendar year.
2. NTTF-R members hired on a 12-month appointment will follow the review schedule established by Office of Academic Affairs (OAA) for NTTF hired on 9-month appointments. For example, a 12-month NTTF-R member who is hired April 1, 2018, will receive their first review during the 2019-20 review schedule beginning September 16, 2019.
3. Changes in rank and compensation related to the promotion will be effective at the beginning of the NTTF-R member’s next appointment period, typically July 1 for 12- month appointments and September 16 for 9-month appointments.
(d) (d) Promotional and/or Continuous Appointment reviews of NTTF-I members with “mid-year” hire dates
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: Collective Bargaining Agreement
Reviews of Non-Tenure Track Instructional and Research Faculty. (a) The Faculty Senate is responsible for the development of guidelines governing the evaluation of non- non tenure track faculty, including evaluations that occur prior to, at the time of, and following continuous appointment. Each Department/Academic Unit shall establish and maintain guidelines for review of non-tenure track instructional and research faculty bargaining unit members that are consistent with guidelines developed by the Faculty Senate. Nothing in this provision affects or alters the Association’s 's ability to file a grievance, as provided in Article 28 that alleges a violation of such guidelines.
(b) The guidelines must, at a minimum:
a. Be in writing and be made available to members;
b. Require each department to identify the committee(s) responsible for the evaluations;
c. Establish job-relevant evaluation criteria and require the criteria to be in writing;; PSU & AAUP e=ent, 2015-19 page 26
d. Provide that the results of the review be in writing and provided to the member;
e. Provide that the member is entitled to meet with the reviewers;
f. Provide that the member is able to respond to the review by submitting a statement or comments, which shall be attached to the review;
g. Provide that the member may submit relevant materials to the reviewers;
h. Provide that the member may request a review if one has not been provided within the time period provided for by the guidelines;
i. 1. Provide that the member is to have reasonable notice of the evaluation; and
j. and I· In a department with more than one non-tenure track faculty member, provide that at least one non-tenure track faculty member will be on the review committee.
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: Collective Bargaining Agreement
