Right to Request Capacity Check Test and Test Protocol Sample Clauses

Right to Request Capacity Check Test and Test Protocol. The Buyer shall have the option, exercisable on no more than two (2) occasions per Contract Year, to require the Supplier, within ten (10) Business Days after written notice has been delivered to the Supplier, provided it is not during an Outage, to conduct a test (the “Capacity Check Test”), at the Supplier’s sole cost and expense, that may be witnessed by the Buyer or its Representative, to confirm the ability of the Facility to produce the Contract Capacity, as described below. The Capacity Check Test will be carried out in accordance with a test protocol (the “Test Protocol”) which will include the format of the report to be prepared in respect of the Capacity Check Test and which Test Protocol is to be prepared by the Supplier and submitted in writing to the Buyer for approval at least three (3) months prior to the Term Commencement Date. The measurements of the Capacity Check Test shall be made using high accuracy calibrated instruments and recording systems or Facility instrumentation, including tariff meters for Electricity acceptable to the Buyer, acting reasonably. Each Capacity Check Test consists of the Facility generating Electricity for four (4) continuous hours during a period designated by the Supplier on prior written notice to the Buyer in advance as a test period, subject to coordination and approval of the IESO, and shall be evaluated based on calculation‌ of the generator output at the Delivery Point net of any Station Service Loads in accordance with the Metering Plan. The Supplier acknowledges and agrees that the Contract Capacity, the Electricity output of the Facility and the Station Service Loads, as may be measured by the Capacity Check Test, shall not be adjusted for ambient weather conditions. For greater certainty, the Capacity Check Test shall be based on the Season 1 Contract Capacity, Season 2 Contract Capacity, Season 3 Contract Capacity or the Season 4 Contract Capacity, as applicable, depending on the calendar month during which the Capacity Check Test is conducted.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Right to Request Capacity Check Test and Test Protocol

  • Acceptance Tests 11.1 If the Contract provides acceptance tests for Goods and/or the result of Services after their completion and/or delivery to the Purchaser, the acceptance shall only be considered as definitive when such tests have demonstrated the compliance of the Goods and/or the result of the Services to the requirements in the Contract. 11.2 Where the Contract provides for an acceptance procedure in the presence of both parties, at the successful completion of such procedure, the Purchaser shall issue the Supplier with an acceptance certificate which shall authorise the Supplier to invoice the Purchaser for any payment due on such acceptance. 11.3 The Purchaser shall at its discretion be entitled to issue and acceptancecertificate with reserves. The Supplier shall be obliged to remedy any non-conformities within the period set out in the acceptance certificate. Any payment which would otherwise have been due on acceptance may be withheld by the Purchaser in whole or part until the non- conformities underlying the reserves have been remedied.

  • Acceptance Testing At the time of installation of a LIS trunk group, and at no additional charge, acceptance tests will be performed to ensure that the service is operational and meets the applicable technical parameters.

  • System Upgrade Facilities and System Deliverability Upgrades Connecting Transmission Owner shall design, procure, construct, install, and own the System Upgrade Facilities and System Deliverability Upgrades described in Appendix A hereto. The responsibility of the Developer for costs related to System Upgrade Facilities and System Deliverability Upgrades shall be determined in accordance with the provisions of Attachment S to the ISO OATT.

  • Contractor Certification Clauses Contractor represents and warrants that the following statements are true. During the term of the Agreement, Contractor shall not take an action, or omit to perform any act, that results in a representation and warranty becoming untrue. Contractor shall promptly notify the Judicial Council if any representation and warranty becomes untrue. A. No Gratuities. Contractor has not directly or indirectly offered or given any gratuities (in the form of entertainment, gifts, or otherwise) to any Judicial Council personnel with a view toward securing this Agreement or securing favorable treatment with respect to any determinations concerning the performance of this Agreement.

  • Right to Observe Testing Developer and Connecting Transmission Owner shall each notify the other Party, and the NYISO, in advance of its performance of tests of its Attachment Facilities. The other Party, and the NYISO, shall each have the right, at its own expense, to observe such testing.

  • Service Specification The Parties have agreed upon the scope and specification of the Services provided under this Service Agreement in the Service Specification.

  • Random Testing Notwithstanding any provisions of the Collective Agreement or any special agreements appended thereto, section 4.6 of the Canadian Model will not be applied by agreement. If applied to a worker dispatched by the Union, it will be applied or deemed to be applied unilaterally by the Employer. The Union retains the right to grieve the legality of any imposition of random testing in accordance with the Grievance Procedure set out in this Collective Agreement.

  • Test procedure The engine speed shall be gradually increased from idle to the target engine speed, not exceeding the tolerance band of ±3 per cent of the target engine speed, and held constant. Then the throttle control shall be rapidly released and the engine speed shall be returned to idle. The sound pressure level shall be measured during a period of operation consisting of a maintaining constant engine speed of 1 second and throughout the entire deceleration period. The maximum sound level meter reading during this period of operation, mathematically rounded to the first decimal place, is taken as the test value.

  • System Access Control Data processing systems used to provide the Cloud Service must be prevented from being used without authorization.

  • Network Access Control The VISION Web Site and the Distribution Support Services Web Site (the “DST Web Sites”) are protected through multiple levels of network controls. The first defense is a border router which exists at the boundary between the DST Web Sites and the Internet Service Provider. The border router provides basic protections including anti-spoofing controls. Next is a highly available pair of stateful firewalls that allow only HTTPS traffic destined to the DST Web Sites. The third network control is a highly available pair of load balancers that terminate the HTTPS connections and then forward the traffic on to one of several available web servers. In addition, a second highly available pair of stateful firewalls enforce network controls between the web servers and any back-end application servers. No Internet traffic is allowed directly to the back-end application servers. The DST Web Sites equipment is located and administered at DST’s Winchester data center. Changes to the systems residing on this computer are submitted through the DST change control process. All services and functions within the DST Web Sites are deactivated with the exception of services and functions which support the transfer of files. All ports on the DST Web Sites are disabled, except those ports required to transfer files. All “listeners,” other than listeners required for inbound connections from the load balancers, are deactivated. Directory structures are “hidden” from the user. Services which provide directory information are also deactivated.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!