ROIC Peer Group Rank Sample Clauses

ROIC Peer Group Rank. In determining the actual number of Shares to be paid out pursuant to this Exhibit A on the Vesting Date, the Committee will determine the Company’s average ROIC (as hereinafter defined) over the three years comprising the Performance Period (i.e., the arithmetic mean of ROICs for the three individual years) and compare such number against the average ROIC for the companies included in the Peer Group (as hereinafter defined). Based on the ranking of the Company’s ROIC with the Peer Group, Shares equal to the Applicable Percentage of the number of Performance Units will be paid out as follows: Top quartile 100% Second quartile 80% Third quartile 40% Fourth quartile 0% The “Peer Group” will include Aptargroup, Xxxxx, Xxxxx Plastics, Cascades, Clearwater Paper, Crown Holdings, Domtar, Glatfelter, Graphic Packaging, Grief, International Paper, KapStone, Xxxxx Illinois, Resolute Forest Products, Sealed Air, Silgan, Sonoco and Westrock. The Committee may modify the Peer Group for significant or extraordinary events outside the ordinary course of business, such as mergers or acquisitions, recapitalizations, bankruptcy or other events in which a Peer Group company ceases reporting financial results to the public.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
ROIC Peer Group Rank. In determining the actual number of Shares to vest pursuant to this Exhibit A on the Service Vesting Date, the Committee will determine the Company’s average ROIC (as hereinafter defined) over the three years comprising the Performance Period (i.e., the arithmetic mean of ROICs for the three individual years) and compare such number against the average ROIC for the companies included in the Peer Group (as hereinafter defined). Based on the ranking of the Company’s ROIC with the Peer Group, the Applicable Percentage of Shares will vest as follows: Top quartile 100% Second quartile 80% Third quartile 40% Fourth quartile 0% The “Peer Group” will include Aptargroup, Xxxxx, Xxxxx Plastics, Boise, Cascades, Clearwater Paper, Crown Holdings, Domtar, Glatfelter, Graphic Packaging, Grief, International Paper, KapStone, Xxxxx Illinois, Resolute Forest Products, Rock Tenn, Sealed Air, Silgan and Sonoco. The Committee may modify the Peer Group for significant or extraordinary events outside the ordinary course of business, such as mergers or acquisitions, recapitalizations, bankruptcy or other events in which a Peer Group company ceases reporting financial results to the public.
ROIC Peer Group Rank. The Performance Criterion applicable to the award is return on invested capital, or “ROIC” as more fully described in your Notice of Award. In determining the actual number of Shares to be paid out pursuant to this Exhibit A on the Vesting Date, the Committee will determine the Company’s average ROIC (as defined in your Notice of Award) over the three years comprising the Performance Period (i.e., the arithmetic mean of ROICs for the three individual years) and compare such number against the average ROIC for the companies included in the Peer Group (as defined in your Notice of Award). The performance and payout scale is set forth in your Notice of Award. Promptly after the end of the Performance Period, the Committee shall determine the Company’s performance against the Peer Group and the number of Shares to be paid out upon vesting. If the Vesting Date occurs after the last day of the Performance Period, then you must continue to serve the Company through the Vesting Date (pursuant to Section 5 of this Award Agreement) as a condition to such Shares being paid out.
ROIC Peer Group Rank. In determining the actual number of Shares to vest pursuant to this Exhibit A on the Service Vesting Date, the Committee will determine the Company’s average ROIC (as hereinafter defined) over the three years comprising the Performance Period (i.e., the arithmetic mean of ROICs for the three individual years) and compare such number against the average ROIC for the companies included in the Peer Group (as hereinafter defined). Based on the ranking of the Company’s ROIC with the Peer Group, the Applicable Percentage of Shares will vest as follows:
ROIC Peer Group Rank. The Performance Criterion applicable to the award is return on invested capital, or “ROIC” as more fully described in your Notice of Award. In determining the actual number of Shares to be paid out pursuant to this Exhibit A on the Vesting Date, the Committee will determine the Company’s average ROIC (as defined in your Notice of Award) over the three years comprising the Performance Period (i.e., the arithmetic mean of ROICs for the three individual years) and compare such number against the average ROIC for the companies included in the Peer Group (as defined in your Notice of Award). The performance and payout scale is set forth in your Notice of Award. Promptly after the end of the Performance Period, the Committee shall determine the Company’s performance against the Peer Group and the number of Shares to be paid out upon vesting.

Related to ROIC Peer Group Rank

  • Minimum Adjusted EBITDA Borrower shall maintain a minimum trailing six-month Adjusted EBITDA minus dividend distributions (other than tax distributions), as of such test date, of at least the greater of (a) $75,000,000 and (b) an amount equal to 75% of the trailing six-month Adjusted EBITDA minus dividend distributions (other than tax distributions), for the immediately preceding six-month period, tested semi-annually, commencing September 30, 2024, and continuing on each subsequent March 31 and September 30.

  • Adjusted EBITDA The 2019 adjusted EBITDA for the Affiliated Club Sellers shall total an aggregate of not less than $10,700,000.

  • Ongoing Performance Measures The Department intends to use performance-reporting tools in order to measure the performance of Contractor(s). These tools will include the Contractor Performance Survey (Exhibit H), to be completed by Customers on a quarterly basis. Such measures will allow the Department to better track Vendor performance through the term of the Contract(s) and ensure that Contractor(s) consistently provide quality services to the State and its Customers. The Department reserves the right to modify the Contractor Performance Survey document and introduce additional performance-reporting tools as they are developed, including online tools (e.g. tools within MFMP or on the Department's website).

  • Staffing Levels To the extent legislative appropriations and PIN authorizations allow, safe staffing levels will be maintained in all institutions where employees have patient, client, inmate or student care responsibilities. In July of each year, the Secretary or Deputy Secretary of each agency will, upon request, meet with the Union, to hear the employees’ views regarding staffing levels. In August of each year, the Secretary or Deputy Secretary of Budget and Management will, upon request, meet with the Union to hear the employees’ views regarding the Governor’s budget request.

  • Total Net Leverage Ratio Holdings and its Restricted Subsidiaries, on a consolidated basis, shall not permit the Total Net Leverage Ratio on the last day of any Test Period to exceed the ratio set forth below opposite the last day of such Test Period:

  • Maximum Senior Leverage Ratio Permit the Senior Leverage Ratio on the last day of any fiscal quarter during any period set forth below to be greater than the ratio set forth opposite such date or period below: Period Ratio ------ ----- September 30, 2001 2.50:1.0 December 31, 2001 2.00:1.0 March 31, 2002 through June 30, 2002 2.50:1.0 September 30, 2002 2.00:1.0 December 31, 2002 1.50:1.0 March 31, 2003 through June 30, 2003 2.00:1.0 September 30, 2003 1.50:1.0 December 31, 2003 and thereafter 1.25:1.0

  • EBITDA The term “EBITDA” shall mean, with respect to any fiscal period, “Consolidated EBITDA” as defined in the Credit Agreement, provided that the following should also be excluded from the calculation of EBITDA to the extent not already excluded from the calculation of Consolidated EBITDA under the Credit Agreement: (i) Non-Cash Charges (as defined in the Credit Agreement) related to any issuances of equity securities; (ii) fees and expenses relating to the Acquisition; (iii) financing fees (both cash and non-cash) relating to the Acquisition; (iv) covenant-not-to-compete payments to certain members of the Company’s senior management and related expenses; (v) expenses (or any portion thereof) incurred outside of the ordinary course of business that are approved by the Board which the Board determines in its good faith discretion are in the best interest of the Company but which will have a disproportionately adverse impact on the Company’s short term financial performance, affecting the Company’s ability to achieve financial targets related to the vesting of the Class C Units under the Incentive Unit Subscription Agreements or the Company’s annual bonus plan; (vi) costs and expenses incurred in connection with evaluating and consummating acquisitions not contemplated by the Company’s annual plan, as such plan is approved by the Board in good faith; (vii) related party expenditures that are subject to the prior written consent of the Majority Executives pursuant to Section 2.3(a) of the Securityholders Agreement but have failed to receive such consent; (viii) advisors’ fees and expenses incurred outside the ordinary course of business related solely to Vestar’s activities that are unrelated to the Company; (ix) costs associated with any put option or call option contemplated by any Rollover Subscription Agreement or Incentive Unit Subscription Agreement; (x) costs associated with any proposed initial Public Offering or Sale of the Company (as such terms are defined in the Securityholders Agreement); (xi) expenses related to any litigation arising from the Acquisition; (x) management fees and costs related to the activities giving rise to such fees that are paid to, paid for or reimbursed to Vestar and its Affiliates; and (xii) material expenditures or incremental expenditures inconsistent with prior practice (to the extent that prior practice is relevant) required by Board (where Management Managers (as defined in the Securityholders Agreement) unanimously dissent) unless such expenditures are reasonably likely to result in any benefit (whether economic or non-economic) to the Company as determined by the Board in its good faith discretion.

  • Funded Debt to EBITDA Section 10.2 of the Loan Agreement is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:

  • Maximum Leverage Permit, as of any fiscal quarter end, the ratio of (a) Adjusted Portfolio Equity as of such fiscal quarter end to (b) Funded Debt as of such fiscal quarter end, to be less than 5.00 to 1.00.

  • Adjusted Quick Ratio A ratio of (i) Quick Assets to (ii) Current Liabilities minus the current portion of Deferred Revenue of at least 1.50 to 1.00.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!