Scenarios predicting population changes Sample Clauses

Scenarios predicting population changes. Presenting a ‘business-as-usual’ scenario is important because this presents how the population would change in the absence of the foreseen conservation or management actions. This can demonstrate how the conservation status of a declining species is likely to deteriorate in the future and how that may affect its use, if there is any. This can emphasise the urgency of implementing the Plan and this can be used effectively to inform donors and other decision-makers. This can be produced before the workshop. Developing an ‘implementation’ scenario helps to establish realistic conservation targets both in terms of population parameters and in terms of the scale of intervention needed to achieve the desired future state of the population. During the planning phase, different scenarios can be used to assess the (cost-)effectiveness of different conservation scenarios and help choosing the most effective conservation strategy. This can be produced during or after the workshop and should inform the indicators for the goals and purpose.
View SourceView Similar (5)
Scenarios predicting population changes. Presenting a ‘business-as-usual’ scenario is important because this presents how the population would change in the absence of the foreseen conservation or management actions. This can demonstrate how the conservation status of a declining species is likely to deteriorate in the future and how that may affect its use, if there is any. In case of species that cause human-wildlife conflicts, it can show how the problems are expected to increase. This can emphasise the urgency of implementing the Plan and this can be used effectively to inform donors and other decision-makers. Developing an ‘implementation’ scenario helps to establish realistic conservation and management targets both in terms of population parameters and in terms of the scale of intervention needed to achieve the desired future state of the population. During the planning phase, different scenarios can be used to assess the (cost-)effectiveness of different conservation and management scenarios and help choosing the most effective conservation or management strategy.
View Source
Scenarios predicting population changes. Presenting a ‘business-as-usual’ scenario is important because this presents how the population would change in the absence of the foreseen conservation or management actions. This can demonstrate how the conservation status of a declining species is likely to deteriorate in the future and how that may affect its use, if there is any. In case of species that cause human-wildlife conflicts, it can show how the problems are expected to increase. This can emphasise the urgency of implementing the Plan and this can be used effectively to inform donors and other decision-makers. This can be produced before the workshop. Developing an ‘implementation’ scenario helps to establish realistic conservation and management targets both in terms of population parameters and in terms of the scale of intervention needed to achieve the desired future state of the population. During the planning phase, different scenarios can be used to assess the (cost-)effectiveness of different conservation and management scenarios and help choosing the most effective conservation or management strategy. This can be produced during or after the workshop and should inform the indicators for the goals and purpose.
View Source

Related to Scenarios predicting population changes

  • Product Changes Vocera shall have the right, in its absolute discretion, without liability to End User, to update to provide new functionality or otherwise change the design of any Product or to discontinue the manufacture or sale of any Product. Vocera shall notify End User at least 90 days prior to the delivery of any Product which incorporates a change that adversely affects form, fit or function (“Material Change”). Vocera shall also notify End User at least 90 days prior to the discontinuance of manufacture of any Product. Notification will be made as soon as reasonably practical for changes associated with regulatory or health and safety issues.

  • Contract Changes 31.1 All changes to the Call-Off Contract which cannot be accommodated informally as described in Clause 30 will require a Contract Change Note. 31.2 Either Party may request a contract change by completing and sending a draft Contract Change Note in the form in Schedule 4 of Part C - The Schedules ('the Contract Change Notice') to the other Party giving sufficient information to enable the other Party to assess the extent of the change and any additional cost that may be incurred. The Party requesting the contract change will bear the costs of preparation of the Contract Change Notice. Neither Party will unreasonably withhold nor delay consent to the other Party’s proposed changes to the Call-Off Contract. 31.3 Due to the agile-based delivery methodology recommended by the Framework Agreement, it may not be possible to exactly define the consumption of Services over the duration of the Call-Off Contract in a static Order Form. The Supplier should state the initial value of all Services that are likely to be consumed under the Call-Off Contract.

  • Switching System Hierarchy and Trunking Requirements For purposes of routing ECI traffic to Verizon, the subtending arrangements between Verizon Tandem Switches and Verizon End Office Switches shall be the same as the Tandem/End Office subtending arrangements Verizon maintains for the routing of its own or other carriers’ traffic (i.e., traffic will be routed to the appropriate Verizon Tandem subtended by the terminating End Office serving the Verizon Customer). For purposes of routing Verizon traffic to ECI, the subtending arrangements between ECI Tandem Switches and ECI End Office Switches shall be the same as the Tandem/End Office subtending arrangements that ECI maintains for the routing of its own or other carriers’ traffic.

  • Program Changes Contractor agrees to inform the County of any alteration in program or service delivery at least thirty (30) days prior to the implementation of the change, or as soon as reasonably feasible.