Security Level Sample Clauses

Security Level. Both American Agriculture and the Company shall, and shall cause their respective affiliates and subsidiaries to, work together to ensure that they are each able to maintain their respective current levels (or, if greater, an industry standard level) of physical and electronic security during the term of this Agreement (including data security and data privacy), and to address any new security-related issues, including compliance with applicable law related to security and issues related to new technologies or threats.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Security Level. A secret is said to have security level 2k over a finite field F if the best-known attack for obtaining the secret involves running an algorithm that requires at least 2k elementary operations (addition, subtraction, multiplication, division) in the finite field F. We assume that Xxxxxxxx is running on the braid group BN over the finite field Fq. Note that there are qN polynomials of degree N − 1 over Fq. So a brute force search for a particular polynomial of degree N − 1 over Fq has security level qN . • The brute force security level of the matrix Ci is qN . • The brute force security levels of the matrices C, Cj are qN . The T -values is a set of field elements {τ1, τ2, . . . , τN } where none of the τi = 0 or 1. • The brute force security level of the T -values is (q − 2)N . Note that the size of the public keys Pubi of the devices Di is N 2 · log2(q) + N log2(N ) and the size of the public key of the HD is (N 2 + N ) · log2(q). We can thus assert • The brute force security level of the exchanged key is 2N log2(q) = qN . • The brute force security level of either of the private braids β, βj is SL > (2r)L where L is the length of the braid as a word in the conjugates assigned to the HD, and hence we have the lower bound SL > min((2r)L, (q − 2)N ). An active attacker who attempts to run a weak-key attack can force a reduction in security level. Specifically, we would expect the search-space of sj to be qX where X is the number of non-zero entres in the s vector sent by the HD to Di, or more accurately, the number of non-zero entries required by Di. An attacker who sends an s vector with just under half of the entries 0 would reduce the security level by half. Therefore, to properly defeat this kind of attack requires choices for N and q such that qN 22SL, or more accurately, qX 2SL where X < N . A passive eavesdropper only gains access to the public keys and s-column. That does not provide enough information to reproduce the shared secret. In that E-Multiplication is conjectured to be a one-way function, knowledge of (CiMi, σi) does not enable an attacker to learn Ci, which would be required to compute the shared secret as Di. Similarly, knowledge of (CjMjM−1C−1) does not provide enough information to deduce C, Cj, β, or βj. This prevents computing the shared secret as the HD using Di’s public key. If an attacker breaks into one Di device and reads out its key material, they cannot use that against another device Dj (i = j). Each device’s matrices are in...
Security Level. Qualification of the degree of risk that an incident affecting maritime security be attempted or will occur.
Security Level. Xxxxxxx shall, and shall cause its affiliates and subsidiaries to, and the REIT and the Operating Partnership shall, and shall cause its affiliates and subsidiaries to, work together to ensure that they are each able to maintain their respective current levels (or, if greater, an industry standard level) of physical and electronic security during the term of this Agreement (including data security and data privacy), and to address any new security related issues, including compliance with applicable law related to security and issues related to new technologies or threats.
Security Level. Certain securities will be restricted from lending at the direction of Lender. Lender will communicate such restrictions to Agent from time to time.
Security Level. Supervisor Worker Administrative Support

Related to Security Level

  • Secured Leverage Ratio Permit the Secured Leverage Ratio, as of the last day of any fiscal quarter of the Consolidated Group, to be greater than forty percent (40%), or, for a period of four consecutive fiscal quarters following a Material Acquisition, forty-five percent (45%).

  • Staffing Levels To the extent legislative appropriations and PIN authorizations allow, safe staffing levels will be maintained in all institutions where employees have patient, client, inmate or student care responsibilities. In July of each year, the Secretary or Deputy Secretary of each agency will, upon request, meet with the Union, to hear the employees’ views regarding staffing levels. In August of each year, the Secretary or Deputy Secretary of Budget and Management will, upon request, meet with the Union to hear the employees’ views regarding the Governor’s budget request.

  • Formal Level (1) Level I - within fifteen (15) days after the occurrence of the alleged violation, misinterpretation, or misapplication of a provision of this Agreement, the grievant must present the grievance in writing on the approved form or lose the right to grieve. The form shall contain a clear, concise statement of the grievance, including the provision or provisions of this Agreement alleged to have been violated, misinterpreted, or misapplied; the circumstances involved, the decision rendered at the informal level, and the specific remedy sought. The immediate supervisor shall hold a hearing with the grievant, and shall communicate the decision in writing to the grievant within seven (7) days after receiving the grievance. In the event the immediate supervisor fails to conduct a hearing and render a decision in writing within seven days, the grievant shall notify the Superintendent, who shall convene a hearing with the immediate supervisor and the grievant within seven (7) days after notification, and direct the immediate supervisor to render a decision in writing. Such a directed decision shall be made within three (3) days. (2) Level II - In the event the grievant is not satisfied with the decision at Level I, the grievant may appeal the decision on the approved form to the Superintendent or his/her designee within seven (7) days of the receipt of the Level I decision. The form shall include a copy of the original grievance, the decision at Level I, and a clear and concise statement of the reason for the appeal. The Superintendent or his designee shall hold a hearing with the parties and render a written decision within ten (10) days of the receipt of the appeal. (3) Level III - In the event the grievant is not satisfied with the decision at Level II, the Association may advise the District within seven (7) days of receipt of the Level II decision of its intent to request a mediator from the California State Conciliation Mediation Service.

  • Informal Level Before filing a formal written grievance, the grievant shall attempt to resolve it by an informal conference with his/her immediate supervisor.

  • Level I If the grievance is not resolved through informal discussions, the School District designee shall give a written decision on the grievance to the parties involved within ten (10) days after receipt of the written grievance.

  • Performance Levels (a) The Performance Levels which apply to the performance by the respective Parties of their obligations under this Agreement are set out in Part 1 of Schedule 5. A failure by either Party to achieve the relevant Performance Level will not constitute a breach of this Agreement and the only consequences of such failure as between the Parties shall be the consequences set out in this Clause 5.6. (b) If the Operator does not comply with the Operator Performance Level then the Access Holder must pay to QR Network the amount determined in accordance with Schedule 5 as part of the invoice issued by QR Network for Access Charges and other charges for the Billing Period immediately following QR Network becoming entitled to that amount. Where there is no next Billing Period, the Operator must pay such amount to QR Network within fourteen (14) days after receipt of a Tax Invoice from QR Network. (c) If QR Network does not comply with the QR Network Performance Level then QR Network will credit to the Access Holder the amount determined in accordance with Schedule 5 by way of a deduction from the invoice issued by QR Network for Access Charges and other charges for the Billing Period immediately following the Access Holder becoming entitled to that amount. Where there is no next Billing Period, QR Network must pay such amount to the Access Holder within fourteen (14) days after receipt of a Tax Invoice from the Access Holder. (d) The Parties must, if requested by either Party, meet to review the Performance Levels subject to such review not occurring within six (6) Months after the Commitment Date or any previous review of the Performance Levels. If either Party notifies the other that it considers that the Performance Levels are no longer appropriate, the Parties may agree on varied Performance Levels and any associated variations to the Agreement including the Base Access Charges and the Train Service Description. If the Parties are unable to agree to such variations, then the existing Performance Levels shall continue to apply unless varied by QR Network in accordance with the provisions of Clause 5.6(e). (e) In the event that the Access Holder and/or the Operator (i) does not comply in any material respect with the Train Service Description; and (ii) the Access Holder fails to demonstrate to the reasonable satisfaction of QR Network when requested to do so, that the Access Holder will consistently comply with the Train Service Description for the remainder of the Term then, following consultation with the Access Holder, QR Network will be entitled to: (iii) vary the Train Service Description to a level it reasonably expects to be achievable by the Access Holder for the remainder of the Term having regard to the extent of previous compliance with the Train Service Description (ignoring, for the purpose of assessing previous compliance, any non-compliance to the extent that the non-compliance was attributable to a Railway Operator (other than the Access Holder) or to QR Network); and (iv) vary the Agreement (including, without limitation, the Operator Performance Level and the Base Access Charges) to reflect the impact of the change in the Train Service Description. (f) The Access Holder shall be entitled to dispute any variation proposed by QR Network pursuant to Clause 5.6(e) and such dispute will be referred to an expert for resolution in accordance with Clause 17.3.

  • Collateral Coverage Ratio ‌ (i) Within ten (10) Business Days after (x) the last day of March, June, September and December of each year (beginning with December 2020) or (y) any date on which an Appraisal is delivered pursuant to clause Error! Reference source not found. of Section 5.16 (each such date in clauses (x) and (y), a “CCR Reference Date” and the tenth Business Day after a CCR Reference Date, a “CCR Certificate Delivery Date”), the Parent shall deliver to the Administrative Agent a certificate of a Responsible Officer of the Parent containing a calculation of the Collateral Coverage Ratio (a “CCR Certificate”). (ii) If the Collateral Coverage Ratio with respect to any CCR Reference Date is less than 1.60 to 1.00, the Borrower shall, no later than ten (10) Business Days after the applicable CCR Certificate Delivery Date, (x) prepay any outstanding Loans such that following such prepayment, the Collateral Coverage Ratio with respect to such CCR Reference Date, recalculated by subtracting any such prepaid portion of the Loans, shall be no less than 1.60 to 1.00 and/or (y) designate Additional Collateral as additional Eligible Collateral and comply with Sections 5.13 and 5.15, collectively, in an amount such that following such designation, the Collateral Coverage Ratio with respect to such CCR Reference Date, recalculated by adding such Additional Collateral, shall be no less than 1.60 to 1.00. (iii) At the Parent’s request, the Lien on any Collateral will be released; provided, in each case, that the following conditions are satisfied or waived: (a) no Event of Default shall have occurred and be continuing, (b) either (x) after giving effect to such release, the Collateral Coverage Ratio is not less than 2.00 to 1.00 (or in the case of a swap or exchange of existing Additional Collateral with new Additional Collateral, less than 1.60 to 1.00) or (y) the Parent shall prepay or cause to be prepaid the Loans and/or shall designate Eligible Collateral as Additional Collateral and comply with Sections 5.13 and 5.15, collectively, in an amount necessary to cause the Collateral Coverage Ratio to not be less than 2.00 to 1.00 (or in the case of a swap or exchange of existing Additional Collateral with new Additional Collateral, less than‌

  • Level IV a. If the grievant is not satisfied with the disposition of his/her grievance at Level III, he/she may file the grievance within five (5) days of the Level III response for transmittal to the Board. b. The Board will hear the grievance at its next regularly scheduled meeting or a special meeting which has been called for that purpose. The Board shall transmit its written decision to the grievant within five (5) days of the meeting. The decision of the Board shall be final. Nothing in this section shall be construed so as to deny a grievant any appeal rights available under the law.

  • Senior Leverage Ratio The Borrower shall not permit its Senior Leverage Ratio at any time to exceed 2.75 to 1.00.

  • Total Leverage Ratio The Borrowers will not permit the Total Leverage Ratio on the last day of any fiscal quarter to exceed 3.75 to 1.00.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!