Settlement Class Representatives and Settlement Class Counsel. The Court finds that Plaintiffs will likely satisfy the requirements of Rule 23(e)(2)(A) and should be appointed as the Class Representatives. Additionally, the Court finds that Xxxx X. Xxxxxxx of Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, X. Xxxxxx Xxxxxx of the Xxxxxx Law Firm, Xxxxx
Settlement Class Representatives and Settlement Class Counsel. Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, and Xxxxxx Xxxxxx are hereby provisionally designated and appointed as the Settlement Class Representatives. The Court provisionally finds that the Settlement Class Representatives are similarly situated to absent Settlement Class Members, and are therefore typical of the Class, and that they will be adequate Settlement Class Representatives. The Court finds that Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, PLLC is experienced and adequate counsel and are provisionally designated as Settlement Class Counsel.
Settlement Class Representatives and Settlement Class Counsel. The Court finds that Plaintiffs Xxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxxx Xxx-Fosudo, Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx, and Confidence Dike will likely satisfy the requirements of Rule 23(e)(2)(A) and should be appointed as the Class Representatives. Additionally, the Court finds that Xxxxx Xxxxx of Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, LLC; Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxx of Xxxxxxxxx Law LLC; Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxx of the Law Office of Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxx PLLC; Xxxxx Xxxxxx and Xxxxx Xxxx of Siri & Glimstad LLP; A. Xxxxxx Xxxxxx of Xxxxxx Law Firm; and Xxx Xxxxxxxx of Xxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx X.A. will likely satisfy the requirements of Rule 23(e)(2)(A) and should be appointed as Class Counsel pursuant to Rule 23(g)(1).
Settlement Class Representatives and Settlement Class Counsel. Plaintiffs Sanger Powers, Xxxxxx Xxxx, Xxxxxxxx XxXxxxxx, Xxxxx Xxxx, and Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxx are designated and appointed as Settlement Class Representatives. The Court finds that the Settlement Class Representatives are similarly situated to absent Class Members, are typical of the Class, and that they will be adequate Settlement Class Representatives. The Court finds that the following counsel are experienced and adequate counsel and are hereby designated as Settlement Class Counsel pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(g): Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxxx of Xxxxxxxx & Xxxxxxxx and Xxxxx X. Xxxxx of Xxxxx Xxxxx & Xxxxxxx LLP.
Settlement Class Representatives and Settlement Class Counsel. The Court hereby provisionally designates and appoints Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx, Xxxxxxx Xxxx, and Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx as the Settlement Class Representatives. The Court provisionally finds that the Settlement Class Representatives are similarly situated to absent Settlement Class Members and therefore typical of the Settlement Class and that they will be adequate Settlement Class Representatives. The Court finds of the law firms of Siri & Glimstad LLP and Israel Xxxxx LLC are experienced and adequate counsel and are hereby provisionally designated as Class Counsel.
Settlement Class Representatives and Settlement Class Counsel. The Court finds that Plaintiffs will likely satisfy the requirements of Rule 23(e)(2)(A) and should be appointed as the Class Representative. Additionally, the Court finds that Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx of the law firm Turke & Xxxxxxx LLP and Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx of the law firm Xxxxx Mongeluzzi Bendesky P.C. will likely satisfy the requirements of Rule 23(e)(2)(A) and should be appointed as Class Counsel pursuant to Rule 23(g)(1).
Settlement Class Representatives and Settlement Class Counsel. The Court finds that the Plaintiff named in the Complaint will likely satisfy the requirements of Rule 23(e)(2)(A) and be appointed as the Settlement Class representative. Additionally, the Court finds that proposed Class Counsel, Xxxx X. Xxxxxxxxx and Xxxx X. Xxxxx of Xxxxxx & Xxxxxx, xxxx likely satisfy the requirements of Rule 23(e)(2)(A) and are appointed as Class Counsel pursuant to Rule 23(g)(1).
Settlement Class Representatives and Settlement Class Counsel. 4 Xxxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxxxxxx is hereby provisionally designated and appointed as the 5 Settlement Class Representative. The Court provisionally finds that the Settlement Class 6 Representative is similarly situated to absent Class Members and therefore typical of the Class and 7 that she will be an adequate Settlement Class Representative. 8 The Court finds that the following counsel are experienced and adequate counsel and are 9 hereby provisionally designated as Settlement Class Counsel: Xxxxx X. Xxxxx, Xxxx X. Xxxxxxx, 10 and Xxxxxxxx X. Xxxxx of Xxxxx Xxxxx & Xxxxxxx, LLP.
Settlement Class Representatives and Settlement Class Counsel. L. is hereby provisionally designated and appointed as the Settlement Class Representative. The Court provisionally finds that the Settlement Class Representative is similarly situated to absent Class Members and therefore typical of the Class and that she will be an adequate Settlement Class Representative. The Court finds that the following counsel are experienced and adequate counsel and are hereby provisionally designated as Settlement Class Counsel pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 52.08: Xxxxxxxx X. Xxxxxxx of Xxxxxxx Law Firm, P.C., Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxxx of Xxxxxx & Xxxxxx Law Firm, and Xxxxxxx X. Xxxxx and Xxxx XxXxxxx of XxXxxxx & Xxxxx, LLC.
Settlement Class Representatives and Settlement Class Counsel. The Court finds that Plaintiffs Lorenzo Flores and Simba Flores will likely satisfy the requirements of Rule 23(e)(2)(A) and should be appointed as the Class Representatives. Additionally, the Court finds that Raina Borrelli of the law firm TURKE & STRAUSS LLP will likely satisfy the requirements of Rule 23(e)(2)(A) and should be appointed as Class Counsel pursuant to Rule 23(g)(1).
