Source Selection. The nature of the source selection planning process, the techniques for obtaining information, the procedures used in evaluation, and the decision-making methods vary from procurement to procurement. Source selection planning entails: preparing to receive bids or proposals, preparing to apply evaluation criteria, and determining standards to select a Contractor. Proposals are often separated into technical and price sections with each evaluated separately. Evaluation may be complex, requiring a panel experts. Some proposal evaluation may require a consultant’s assistance. The Source Selection Plan (SSP) should include: evaluation criteria, evaluation standards, weighting system, screening system, and source selection process. This category of services is for assistance in preparation of a source selection plan and source selection activities. Services within this category are as follows: Source Selection – Contractor shall develop and prepare source selection plans, in accordance with State statute and rules; instruct evaluation team members on roles and responsibilities; act in the capacity of an advisory role during the evaluation, which may include cost estimating or technical subject matter expertise; ensure Conflict of Interest/Nondisclosure forms are signed; prepare evaluation sheets or score sheets; and prepare draft of source selection decision memorandum. Outputs: Source Selection Plans (SSP), Evaluation Sheets Category Eight – Cost Realism Analysis Cost Realism Analysis is usually conducted after cost proposals have been received in response to a RFP. Cost Realism Analysis may be requested by States to determine if all components of cost have been contemplated from all vendors. Determining if cost proposals are acceptable and fair will assist States in a successful evaluation and award of a contract which is in the best interest of the State. Cost realism is about the system of logic, the assumptions about the future, and the reasonableness of the historical basis of the estimate. It’s about the estimating information (cost data) that makes up the foundation of the estimate. This category of services is for consultation and/or assistance with cost realism analysis services. Services within this category are as follows: Cost Realism – Contractor shall independently review and evaluate specific elements of each Offeror’s proposed cost estimate to determine whether the cost estimate is realistic for the work to be performed; reflects a clear understanding of the requirements; and is consistent with the unique methods of performance and materials described in the Offeror’s technical proposal. Cost realism analysis is conducted by evaluating the supportive data that form the bases of the individual elements of cost to determine probable cost of the performance. The probable cost shall be used for the purposes of evaluation to determine the best value. The probable cost is determined by adjusting each Offeror’s proposed cost, and fee when appropriate, to reflect any additions or reductions in cost elements to realistic levels based on the results of the cost realism analysis.
Appears in 10 contracts
Samples: Naspo Valuepoint Master Agreement, Naspo Valuepoint Master Agreement, Valuepoint Master Agreement