Spanish SCF. The general LMF structure used in the PANACEA lexica is common for all languages. Nevertheless, there is some information that can change in the different languages depending on the kind of information available in each case. Regarding SCFs, the concrete realization of the SyntacticArgument for Spanish is different than Italian. Thus, here we present some examples of Spanish SyntacticArgument and their contents: <SyntacticArgument id=“syn_arg_43_1”> <feat att=“position” val=“1”/> <!-- for Spanish there is only one kind of complement, named “comp”. The realization states the different kind of complements> <feat att=“function” val=“comp”/> <!-- np: noun phrase --> <feat att=“realization” val=“np”/> </SyntacticArgument> <SyntacticArgument id=“syn_arg_47_1”> <feat att=“position” val=“1”/> <feat att=“function” val=“comp”/> <!-- ppa: indirect object --> <feat att=“realization” val=“ppa”/> </SyntacticArgument> <SyntacticArgument id=“syn_arg_43_2”> <feat att=“position” val=“2”/> <feat att=“function” val=“comp”/> <!-- cp: object is a clause phrase, state also the kind of clause.--> <feat att=“realization” val=“cp”/> <!-- inf: infinitive clause --> <feat att=“type” val=“inf”/> </SyntacticArgument> <SyntacticArgument id=“syn_arg_43_2”> <feat att=“position” val=“2”/> <feat att=“function” val=“comp”/> <!-- cp: object is a clause phrase, state also the kind of clause --> <feat att=“realization” val=“cp”/> <!-- fin: finite clause --> <feat att=“type+cl_type” val=“fin”/> </SyntacticArgument> <SyntacticArgument id=“syn_arg_43_3”> <feat att=“position” val=“3”/> <feat att=“function” val=“comp”/> <!-- pp: prepositional complement, state which kind of object it has --> <feat att=“realization” val=“pp”/> <!-- concrete preposition that introduces the pp: --> <feat att=“prep” val=“a”/> <!-- the object of the pp can be “np” or “cp”. If it is a “cp” the type of the “cp” is also stated --> <feat att=“pp_object” val=“cp”/> <feat att=“pp_object+type” val=“inf”/> </SyntacticArgument> <SyntacticArgument id=“syn_arg_44_0”> <!-- the subject is essentitally equal to Italian, the realization can be “np” or “cp”. If it is “cp”, it can have the same options than complement “cp” --> <feat att=“position” val=“0”/> <feat att=“function” val=“subj”/> <feat att=“optionality” val=“yes”/> <feat att=“realization” val=“np”/> </SyntacticArgument>
