Specific Test Sample Clauses

Specific Test. The CREAM CE Service The neuGRID project uses intensively the computational dimension of the grid. In production, the regular Computing Element (CE) service was installed, as this is a production ready service from the gLite middleware which was already thoroughly tested and used across several communities. However and since a couple of months, a new service was released in production named CREAM CE (which stands for Computing Resource Execution And Management). The main difference between the regular gLite CE and the new CREAM CE is that the latter can be accessed directly through a well defined web service interface and is much more performant. Of course, CREAM CE can also be accessed through the regular WMS scheduler via the ICE plug-in. In order to measure potential reactivity and ease of use improvements, WP7 therefore decided to test it. Indeed, CREAM CE uses a push notification mechanism to report on events to WMS, whereas the regular CE uses a push mechanism, which has a direct impact on user-perceived performances. As a consequence, xx-xxxx-xxxxxx0.xxxx-x.xxx server from the PoC environment was migrated to CREAM CE and different tests were applied, as listed below: • Direct job submission of 1 simple job: one job was directly submitted to the CREAM service (direct submission is a new functionality introduced by CREAM CE). In this configuration the functionality improvement was quite impressive as almost no overhead was noticed. Indeed, for a simple job that took 10 seconds of actual execution, using the regular gLite CE it took approximately 4 to 5 minutes to see the real job completion (as it takes a long time to report through the gLite CE/WMS architecture). In the case of CREAM CE, the job status was nearly reported in real time to the Information System. • Direct job submission of 1000 simple jobs: This test was useful to appreciate that the CREAM service is very efficient even when overloaded. The memory usage is well managed in the latest version (Note: this is also the case with the gLite CE). • Submission of 1 job through WMS/ICE: Same here, the difference between a gLite CE and CREAM is significant. It is however less reactive than when submitting directly to the CREAM service but instead of having 4 to 5 minutes, the response time is turned down to 15 seconds. Of course, this performance heavily depends on the load of WMS. • Submission of 1000 jobs through WMS/ICE: This was operated to test the ICE plug-in. The first test was not a compl...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Specific Test. The CREAM CE Service 22 6 List of Abbreviations 24 7 Bibliography 25

Related to Specific Test

  • Force Majeure If by reason of Force Majeure, either party hereto shall be rendered unable wholly or in part to carry out its obligations under this Agreement then such party shall give notice and full particulars of Force Majeure in writing to the other party within a reasonable time after occurrence of the event or cause relied upon, and the obligation of the party giving such notice, so far as it is affected by such Force Majeure, shall be suspended during the continuance of the inability then claimed, except as hereinafter provided, but for no longer period, and such party shall endeavor to remove or overcome such inability with all reasonable dispatch. Choice of Law The Agreement between the Vendor and TIPS/ESC Region 8 and any addenda or other additions resulting from this procurement process, however described, shall be governed by, construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas, regardless of any conflict of laws principles. Venue, Jurisdiction and Service of Process Any Proceeding arising out of or relating to this procurement process or any contract issued by TIPS resulting from or any contemplated transaction shall be brought in a court of competent jurisdiction in Camp County, Texas and each of the parties irrevocably submits to the exclusive jurisdiction of said court in any such proceeding, waives any objection it may now or hereafter have to venue or to convenience of forum, agrees that all claims in respect of the Proceeding shall be heard and determined only in any such court, and agrees not to bring any proceeding arising out of or relating to this procurement process or any contract resulting from or any contemplated transaction in any other court. The parties agree that either or both of them may file a copy of this paragraph with any court as written evidence of the knowing, voluntary and freely bargained for agreement between the parties irrevocably to waive any objections to venue or to convenience of forum. Process in any Proceeding referred to in the first sentence of this Section may be served on any party anywhere in the world. Venue for any dispute resolution process, other than litigation, between TIPS and the Vendor shall be located in Camp or Xxxxx County, Texas.

  • Definitions For purposes of this Agreement:

  • IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written.

  • Severability Any provision of this Agreement that is prohibited or unenforceable in any jurisdiction shall, as to such jurisdiction, be ineffective to the extent of such prohibition or unenforceability without invalidating the remaining provisions hereof, and any such prohibition or unenforceability in any jurisdiction shall not invalidate or render unenforceable such provision in any other jurisdiction.

  • Notices Any notice, request or other document required or permitted to be given or delivered to the Holder by the Company shall be delivered in accordance with the notice provisions of the Purchase Agreement.

  • Termination This Agreement may be terminated at any time prior to the Closing:

  • NOW, THEREFORE the parties hereto agree as follows:

  • Miscellaneous The Vendor acknowledges and agrees that continued participation in TIPS is subject to TIPS sole discretion and that any Vendor may be removed from the participation in the Program at any time with or without cause. Nothing in the Agreement or in any other communication between TIPS and the Vendor may be construed as a guarantee that TIPS or TIPS Members will submit any orders at any time. TIPS reserves the right to request additional proposals for items or services already on Agreement at any time.

  • Governing Law This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York.

  • Counterparts This Agreement may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!