Stage II, Established Program Criteria Sample Clauses

Stage II, Established Program Criteria. In Stage II, the Grant Applications will be ranked on the basis of the established program criteria listed in the table below and value for money / competitiveness of the grant funding requested (i.e., cost per space to government, etc.). Grant Applications that meet or exceed the total minimum required points for each criteria will be considered for final selection. ESTABLISHED PROGRAM CRITERIA AVAILABLE POINTS MINIMUM POINTS REQUIRED TO QUALIFY WEIGHTING SCORE (%) = (Pts) x (W) PASS or FAIL* PRINCIPLE 1: Person-Centred Design and Innovation 50 30 35% PRINCIPLE 2: Viability and Sustainability 70 42 35% PRINCIPLE 3: Person-Centred Care Delivery 40 24 20% PRINCIPLE 4: Partnerships and Collaboration 50 30 10% Total Minimum of 65% Total Score required to proceed to Final Selection of evaluation 100% * To qualify as being eligible for consideration and ranking in relation to other competitive applications, the Project must: o receive a passing grade for each Principle; and o achieve a minimum 65% Total Score.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Stage II, Established Program Criteria

  • Evaluation Criteria 5.2.1. The responses will be evaluated based on the following: (edit evaluation criteria below as appropriate for your project)

  • Program Objectives In performing its responsibilities with respect to the management and administration of the Program, each party shall be guided by the following Program objectives:

  • Program Objective The objectives of the Department’s grants are to:

  • Benchmarks for Measuring Accessibility For the purposes of this Agreement, the accessibility of online content and functionality will be measured according to the W3C’s Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 Level AA and the Web Accessibility Initiative Accessible Rich Internet Applications Suite (WAI-ARIA) 1.0 for web content, which are incorporated by reference. Adherence to these accessible technology standards is one way to ensure compliance with the College’s underlying legal obligations to ensure that people with disabilities are able to acquire the same information, engage in the same interactions, and enjoy the same benefits and services within the same timeframe as their nondisabled peers, with substantially equivalent ease of use; that they are not excluded from participation in, denied the benefits of, or otherwise subjected to discrimination in any College programs, services, and activities delivered online, as required by Section 504 and the ADA and their implementing regulations; and that they receive effective communication of the College’s programs, services, and activities delivered online.

  • Selection Criteria Each Contract is secured by a new or used Motorcycle. No Contract has a Contract Rate less than 1.00%. Each Contract amortizes the amount financed over an original term no greater than 84 months (excluding periods of deferral of first payment). Each Contract has a Principal Balance of at least $500.00 as of the Cutoff Date.

  • Goal The goals of the Department’s grants are to:

  • Additional RO Review Criteria (1) In addition to the requirements in Subparagraph 34A, the RO must:

  • Development Milestones In addition to its obligations under Paragraph 7.1, LICENSEE specifically commits to achieving the following development milestones in its diligence activities under this AGREEMENT: (a) (b).

  • Exclusion Criteria Subjects fulfilling any of the following criteria are not eligible for participation in this study.

  • Desirable Selection Criteria 1. Possession of, or significant progression toward the attainment of a post graduate qualification in area of specialty.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.