Study Bedrooms Sample Clauses

Study Bedrooms. The University reserves the right to remove rubbish that is considered to be a Health and Safety hazard with immediate effect, and may apply a written warning for breach of Health and Safety within the Accommodation. . Schedule 3 Summary of administrative action for breach Level 1 involves a written warning – repeated breaches may escalate action to Level 2 Level 2 involves a meeting and written warning - repeated breaches may escalate action to Level 3 Level 3 involves a meeting with the Sparsholt Residential Support Manager - repeated breaches may escalate action to Level 4 Level 4 involves a meeting with the Sparsholt Residential Support Manager and potential termination of the agreement and reference to the ‘HE Managing Learner/Student Conducts policy’ Dependent on the severity of the breach (which may include multiple breaches in one incident), Housing Managers may apply higher level action as a consequence. If the ‘Housing Managers’ are not available, they will nominate a member of staff to undertake the meeting and issue any warnings. Should persistent breaches of regulations take place by the same Student, the Level of action taken will increase. *The EU letter is explained in clause 6.2 of the Regulations.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (9)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Study Bedrooms. The University reserves the right to remove rubbish that is considered to be a Health and Safety hazard with immediate effect, and may apply a written warning for breach of Health and Safety within the Accommodation. . Schedule 3
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
Study Bedrooms. The University reserves the right to remove rubbish that is considered to be a Health and Safety hazard with immediate effect, and may apply a written warning for breach of Health and Safety within the Accommodation.‌ Schedule 3 Summary of Administrative Action for Breach‌ Level 1 involves a First Written Warning – repeated breaches may escalate action to Level 2 Level 2 involves a Meeting and a Second Written Warning - repeated breaches may escalate action to Level 3 Level 3 involves a Meeting and possible Letter of Extra Undertaking (EU)* - repeated breaches may involve a Meeting with staff from your Academic Faculty in attendance and may escalate action to Level 4 Level 4 involves a Meeting and possible Termination of the Licence Agreement and reference to the ‘Disciplinary Procedures for Students’. Dependent on the severity of the breach (which may include multiple breaches in one incident), Housing Managers may apply higher level action. If the Housing Managers are not available, they will nominate a member of staff to undertake the Meeting and issue any Warning/s. Should persistent breaches of regulations take place by the same Student, the Level of action taken will increase. *The EU letter is explained in Clause 6.2 of the Regulations.
Sample 1

Related to Study Bedrooms

  • Study Population The study was based at the San Francisco KPNC Anal Cancer Screening Clinic. We enrolled men who were identified as positive for HIV through the Kaiser HIV registry, who were aged ≥ 18 years, who were not diag- nosed with anal cancer before enrollment, and who pro- vided informed consent. In total, 363 men were enrolled between August 2009 and June 2010. The study was reviewed and approved by the institutional review boards at KPNC and at the National Cancer Institute. All partici- pants were asked to complete a self-administered ques- tionnaire to collect risk factor information. Additional information regarding HIV status and medication, sexu- ally transmitted diseases, and histopathology results were abstracted from the KPNC clinical database. For 87 of the 271 subjects without biopsy-proven AIN2 or AIN3 at the time of enrollment, follow-up infor- mation concerning outcomes from additional clinic visits up to December 2011 was available and included in the analysis to correct for the possible imperfect sensitivity of high-resolution anoscopy (HRA).13,15 Clinical Examination, Evaluation, and Results During the clinical examination, 2 specimens were col- lected by inserting a wet flocked nylon swab16 into the anal canal up to the distal rectal vault and withdrawing with rotation and lateral pressure. Both specimens were trans- ferred to PreservCyt medium (Hologic, Bedford, Mass). A third specimen was collected for routine testing for Chla- mydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhea. After specimen collection, participants underwent a digital anorectal ex- amination followed by HRA. All lesions that appeared sus- picious on HRA were biopsied and sent for routine histopathological review by KPNC pathologists, and were subsequently graded as condyloma or AIN1 through AIN3. No cancers were observed in this study population. From the first specimen, a ThinPrep slide (Hologic) was prepared for routine Xxxxxxxxxxxx staining and xxxxx- xxxxx. Two pathologists (T.D. and D.T.) reviewed the slides independently. Cytology results were reported anal- ogous to the Bethesda classification17 for cervical cytology except when otherwise noted. The following categories were used: negative for intraepithelial lesion or malig- xxxxx (NILM); ASC-US; atypical squamous cells cannot rule out high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) (ASC-H); low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL); HSIL, favor AIN2 (HSIL-AIN2); and HSIL-AIN3. ASC-H, HSIL-AIN2, and HSIL-AIN3 were combined into a single high-grade cytology category for the current analysis. Biomarker Testing Using the residual specimen from the first collection, mtm Laboratories AG (Heidelberg, Germany) performed the p16INK4a/Ki-67 dual immunostaining (‘‘p16/Ki-67 staining’’) using their CINtec Plus cytology kit according to their specifications. A ThinPrep 2000 processor (Holo- gic) was used to prepare a slide, which then was stained according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The CINtec Plus cytology kit was then applied to the unstained cytol- ogy slide for p16/Ki-67 staining. On the second collected specimen, Roche Molecular Systems (Pleasanton, Calif) tested for HR-HPV, includ- ing separate detection of HPV-16, and HPV-18 DNA, using their cobas 4800 HPV test. To prepare DNA for the cobas test, automated sample extraction was per- formed as follows: 500 lL of the PreservCyt specimen was pipetted into a secondary tube (Falcon 5-mL polypropyl- ene round-bottom tube, which measured 12-mm-by-75- mm and was nonpyrogenic and sterile). The tube was capped, mixed by vortexing, uncapped, placed on the x-480 specimen rack, and loaded onto the x-480 sample extraction module of the cobas 4800 system. The x-480 extraction module then inputs 400 lL of this material into the specimen preparation process. The extracted DNA was then tested as previously described.16 NorChip AS (Klokkarstua, Norway) also tested the second specimen for HPV-16, -18, -31, -33, and -45 HPV E6/E7 mRNA using their PreTect HPV-Proofer assay according to their specifications. All testing was per- formed masked to the results of the other assays, clinical outcomes, and patient characteristics.

  • Road Surfaces (1) Grade, shape, crown, and/or outslope surface and shoulders.

  • Study An application for leave of absence for professional study must be supported by a written statement indicating what study or research is to be undertaken, or, if applicable, what subjects are to be studied and at what institutions.

  • Screening 3.13.1 Refuse containers located outside the building shall be fully screened from adjacent properties and from streets by means of opaque fencing or masonry walls with suitable landscaping.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!