Sufficient grounds Sample Clauses
The 'Sufficient grounds' clause defines the specific reasons or conditions that justify taking a particular action under the contract, such as termination, suspension, or invoking remedies. In practice, this clause outlines what constitutes adequate justification, for example, repeated breaches of contract, failure to meet performance standards, or insolvency. Its core function is to provide clarity and fairness by ensuring that significant actions are only taken when there are legitimate, predefined reasons, thereby protecting both parties from arbitrary or unjustified decisions.
POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 1 times
Sufficient grounds. Post-grant re- view shall not be instituted for a ground of unpatentability unless the Board decides that the petition sup- porting the ground would, if unrebutted, demonstrate that it is more likely than not that at least one of the claims challenged in the petition is unpatentable. The Board’s decision will take into account a patent owner preliminary response where such a re- sponse is filed, including any testi- monial evidence, but a genuine issue of material fact created by such testi- monial evidence will be viewed in the light most favorable to the petitioner solely for purposes of deciding whether to institute a post-grant review. A pe- titioner may seek leave to file a reply to the preliminary response in accord- ance with §§ 42.23 and 42.24(c). Any such request must make a showing of good cause.
Sufficient grounds. Inter partes re- view shall not be instituted for a ground of unpatentability unless the Board decides that the petition sup- porting the ground would demonstrate that there is a reasonable likelihood that at least one of the claims chal- lenged in the petition is unpatentable. The Board’s decision will take into ac- count a patent owner preliminary re- sponse where such a response is filed, including any testimonial evidence, but a genuine issue of material fact created by such testimonial evidence will be viewed in the light most favor- able to the petitioner solely for pur- poses of deciding whether to institute an inter partes review. A petitioner may seek leave to file a reply to the pre- liminary response in accordance with §§ 42.23 and 42.24(c). Any such request must make a showing of good cause. [77 FR 48727, Aug. 14, 2012, as amended at ▇▇ ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇. 1, 2016] AFTER INSTITUTION OF Inter Partes REVIEW