GRANT REVIEW Sample Clauses
GRANT REVIEW. 6.1. DWP will review the Grant during the Funding Period. DWP will take into account the Grant Recipient’s delivery of the Funded Activities against the agreed outputs set out in Annex 4.
6.2. Each review may result in DWP deciding that:
6.2.1. the Funded Activities and this Grant Agreement should continue in line with existing plans;
6.2.2. there should be an increase or decrease in the Grant and the number of Participants supported for the remainder of the Funding Period;
6.2.3. the outputs should be re-defined and agreed;
6.2.4. the Grant Recipient should carry out remedial activity to improve delivery of the Funded Activities;
6.2.5. the Grant be terminated in accordance with clause 22 of these Conditions; and/or
6.2.6. any other action deemed reasonable in the circumstances should be taken.
6.3. If the Grant Recipient is required to carry out remedial activity pursuant to clause 6.2.4, the Grant Recipient will submit a plan to DWP setting out the steps it proposes to take to rectify the areas identified by DWP and the timetable for taking those steps.
6.4. The Grant Recipient may make representations to DWP regarding DWP’s decision under clause 6.2. DWP is not obliged to take such representations into account when making its decision as any such decision will be final and at DWP’s absolute discretion.
GRANT REVIEW. 6.1. The Lead Authority and the Secretary of State will review the Grant during the delivery of the Project Activities and at the conclusion of a Project. The Lead Authority and the Secretary of State will take into account the Project Deliverer’s delivery of the Project Activities against the agreed outputs set out for the Project in Annex 2 in accordance with paragraph 7 of these Conditions.
6.2. Each review may result in the Lead Authority deciding that (an example and non- exhaustive list):
6.2.1. the Project Activities and the Funding Agreement should continue in line with existing plans;
6.2.2. there should be an increase or decrease in the Maximum Sum;
6.2.3. the outputs and outcomes should be re-defined and agreed;
6.2.4. the Project Deliverer should provide the Lead Authority with a Remedial Action Plan setting out the steps the Project Deliverer will take to improve delivery of the Project Activities;
6.2.5. the Lead Authority should recover any Ineligible Expenditure that has been incorrectly claimed; and
6.2.6. the Grant be terminated in accordance with paragraph 27.11 of these Conditions.
6.3. If the Project Deliverer is required to submit a Remedial Action Plan in accordance with paragraph 6.2.4, the Remedial Action Plan process set out in paragraph 27.4 to
GRANT REVIEW.
6.1. The Funder, Lead Authority and the Secretary of State will review the Grant during the delivery of the Project and at the conclusion of the Project. The Funder, Lead Authority and the Secretary of State will take into account the Grant Recipient‘s delivery of the Project against the Outputs and Outcomes in accordance with paragraph 7 of these Conditions.
6.2. Each review may result in the Funder deciding that (an example and non exhaustive list):
6.2.1. the Project and the Funding Agreement should continue in line with existing plans;
6.2.2. there should be an increase or decrease in the Maximum Sum;
6.2.3. the Outputs and Outcomes should be re-defined and agreed;
6.2.4. the Grant Recipient should provide the Funder with a Continuous Improvement Plan setting out the steps the Grant Recipient will take to improve delivery of the Project;
6.2.5. the Funder should recover any Ineligible Expenditure that has been incorrectly claimed; and
6.2.6. the Grant be terminated in accordance with paragraph 27.11 of these Conditions.
6.3. If the Grant Recipient is required to submit a Remedial Action Plan in accordance with paragraph 6.2.4, the Remedial Action Plan process set out in paragraph 27.4 to 27.10 shall apply.
6.4. The Grant Recipient may make representations to the Funder regarding the Funders decision made in accordance with paragraphs 6.1 and 6.
GRANT REVIEW. 6.1. The Department will review the Grant annually. It will take into account the Grantee’s delivery of the Project against the Agreed Outputs and the Project Timetable. As part of each annual review the Department will review the reports produced by the Grantee in accordance with Condition 7.
6.2. Each review may result in the Department deciding to making changes to the Grant Funding Agreement, for example but without limitation, that:
6.2.1. there will be an increase or decrease in the Grant amount paid in the subsequent Financial Year;
6.2.2. the Agreed Outputs should be re-defined;
6.2.3. the Grantee must provide the Department with a draft Remedial Action Plan setting out the steps the Grant Recipient will take to improve delivery of the Funded Activities;
6.2.4. the Department will recover any Unspent Monies; or
6.2.5. the Grant will be terminated in accordance with Condition 26.11.
6.3. If the Grantee is required to submit a draft Remedial Action Plan in accordance with Condition
GRANT REVIEW.
6.1. The Authority will review the Grant at a Governance Board with the Grant Recipient. The frequency of the Governance Board will align with the payment frequency of Grant instalments, as set out at Annex 3, though may be more frequent if reasonably required by the Authority. The Authority will take into account the Grant Recipient’s delivery of the Funded Activities against the agreed outputs and Key Performance Indicators set out in Annex 6 of these Conditions.
6.2. The Grant Recipient will also provide the Authority with its Project Progress Report for review at the Governance Board in such format and containing such information as the Authority may reasonably require, on:
6.2.1. the Grant Recipient’s use of the Grant and delivery of the Funded Activities;
6.2.2. the progress made towards achieving the agreed outputs and the defined outcomes set out in Annex 6 of these Conditions. Where possible, the report will quantify what has been achieved by reference to the Funded Activities’ performance targets; and
6.2.3. any Assets acquired or improved using the Grant.
6.3. Each review at a Governance Board may result in the Authority deciding the following:
6.3.1. the Funded Activities and the Grant Funding Agreement should continue in line with existing plans;
6.3.2. there should be an increase or decrease in the Grant for the subsequent Instalment Period;
6.3.3. the outputs should be re-defined and agreed;
6.3.4. the Grant Recipient should provide the Authority with a draft Remedial Action Plan setting out the steps the Grant Recipient will take to improve delivery of the Funded Activities;
6.3.5. the Authority should recover any Unspent Monies;
6.3.6. the Grant be terminated in accordance with paragraph 26.11 of these Conditions.
6.3.7. a Grant Instalment should or should not be paid;
6.3.8. there has been an Event of Default under paragraph 26.1.5; and/or
6.3.9. any other action deemed reasonable in the circumstances should be taken.
6.4. If the Grant Recipient is required to submit a draft Remedial Action Plan the Remedial Action Plan process set out in paragraph 26.4 to Error! Reference source not found. shall apply.
6.5. The Grant Recipient may make representations to the Authority regarding the Authority’s decision(s) made in accordance with paragraph 6.3. The Authority is not however obliged to take such representations into account when making its decision as any such decision will be final and at the Authority’s absolute discretion.
GRANT REVIEW. 16.1 The Authority will review the Grant at the end of each Financial Year during the Funding Period. The review will include a financial reconciliation and will take into account the Recipient’s delivery of the Activities and its achievement of the Outcomes.
16.2 After each Review the Authority may:
(i) continue payment of the Grant in accordance with the Agreement;
(ii) change the value of the Grant;
(iii) re-define the Outputs and Outcomes;
(iv) request a draft Remedial Action Plan setting out the steps the Recipient will take to improve delivery of the Activities;
(v) recover any Unspent Monies; or
(vi) terminate the Agreement in accordance with paragraph 9.2.
16.3 If the Recipient is required to submit a draft Remedial Action Plan in accordance with paragraph 16.2 the Remedial Action Plan process set out in paragraphs 9.8 to 9.14 shall apply.
GRANT REVIEW. The Authority must review the Grant annually after the end of each financial year. The review must take into account the Grant Recipient’s delivery of the Funded Activities. As part of the annual review the Authority must review the reports produced by the Grant Recipient in accordance with paragraph 9.2.
GRANT REVIEW. The Authority will review the Grant at the intervals specified in the Grant Funding Letter. The review will take into account the Grant Recipient’s delivery of the Funded Activities against the Agreed Performance Measures. As part of the annual review the Authority will review the reports produced by the Grant Recipient in accordance with paragraph . Following the review carried out under paragraph , the Authority may, taking into account any representations made by the Grant Representative in the course of the review, choose to do any of the following: consent to the Funded Activities and the Grant Agreement continuing in line with existing plans; increase or decrease the Grant for the subsequent Financial Year or the remainder of the Funding Period, as applicable; redefine the Agreed Performance Measures; require the Grant Recipient to carry out remedial activity with the aim of improving delivery of the Funded Activities; recover any Unspent Monies; or terminate the Grant Agreement in accordance with paragraph . If required pursuant to paragraph 6.1.4, the Grant Recipient will submit a remedial action plan to the Authority setting out: the areas identified by the Authority in which improvements to the Funded Activities are required; and the steps which the Grant Recipient proposes to take to rectify the areas identified by the Authority and the timetable for taking such steps.
GRANT REVIEW. Xx. Xxxxx added this to the agenda to discuss the upcoming grant awarding. Xx. Xxxxxxx stated the next meeting is May 18 and there is a following meeting on June 15. Grants are due at the end of the day on May 4. Mr. Xxxxxx suggested that in between May 4 and May 18 that the Board Members can score the grants and bring them with them to the meeting for presentations, more discussion can be made on May 18 as well and possibly award then. He stated that there may be a need for a follow up meeting after the May 18 meeting, but June 15 could be too late if the Board is not in agreement. The scoring matrix will be sent out to the Board. The agencies will present on May 18 and Xx. Xxxxx will work with Xx. Xxxxxxx to create a schedule for agencies presenting. Mr. Xxxxxx suggested the Board can even create the framework for what they expect to hear in those presentations. Xx. Xxxxx suggested this be an in-person meeting and be two hours.
GRANT REVIEW. 6.1. The Authority can require a review of the Grant at any time during the Funding Period on twenty Working Days’ notice in writing (in addition to other reporting and monitoring requirements of the Grant Recipient under this Agreement). The Authority will take into account the Grant Recipient’s delivery of the Funded Activities against the agreed outputs set out in the Grant Application.
6.2. Any review under paragraph 6.1may result in the Authority deciding that (for example a non-exclusive list includes):
6.2.1. the Funded Activities and the Grant Funding Agreement should continue in line with existing plans;
6.2.2. there should be an increase or decrease in the Grant for the subsequent Financial Year;
6.2.3. the outputs should be re-defined and agreed; or
6.2.4. the Grant be terminated in accordance with paragraph 21(Default, Termination and Payment).
6.3. The Grant Recipient may make representations to the Authority regarding the Authority’s decision made in accordance with paragraph 6.2. The Authority is not however obliged to take such representations into account when making its decision as any such decision will be final and at the Authority’s absolute discretion.