Summary of research findings Sample Clauses

Summary of research findings. The purpose of this quantitative study was to examine the influence of school relationships factors on the sense of belongingness of Kazakhstani students. Upon reviewing the research questions and findings, some concluding remarks are offered. The majority of the students found their teachers to be helpful and enthusiastic, according to descriptive statistics reported at the student level. Students ranked collaboration higher than competition, and some said they didn't feel like they belonged at school and had been bullied. Notably, the study's findings imply that a student's school relationship experience is generally individual and varied inside the school rather than systemic to certain schools or school systems. As a result, Kazakhstani schools appear to have quite comparable composite school relation ratings. Students' experiences of the school social environment in Kazakhstan is conceptualized using a single-level nine-factor measuring model for student experience of school relations. Generally, results from the main models supported previous theories. However, the positive effects of teacher empathy and teacher enthusiasm were new in this paper. Therefore, this finding seems to be important for further investigations. Despite the majority of school relation factors being statistically significant, this research revealed that most significant factors positively effecting sense of belongingness were Cooperation at School and Teacher Support factors. And Students’ Experience of Being Bullied had the most negative effect on belonging.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Summary of research findings. ‌ The purpose of this quantitative study was to examine the influence of school climate-related factors on students’ academic outcomes in Kazakhstan. It aimed to measure the effect of school climate factors on student academic achievements namely, Math, Reading, Science results. The summary of the research findings is presented by revisiting the research questions. Student level variables were presented by descriptive statistics which states that the majority of the students found their teachers to be supportive and enthusiastic. Students did not seem to face issues with classroom noise and parental involvement. In this regard, the noise level in the Kazakhstani classroom was three times less than in OECD (2019a) average at 26 %. Students rated cooperation above the competition and reported some lack of belongingness to the school and experience of bullying. However, it was important that bullying was not supported by the majority of the students anyway Kazakhstani students were found less compassionate than other OECD countries in terms of anti-bullying attitude. Importantly, the findings of the study suggest that a student experience of school climate is largely individual and not systemic to particular schools or school systems. Therefore, it seems schools in Kazakhstan have quite similar composite school climate scores despite variation within schools. However, despite low ICC scores existing variation had some range from 1% to 7 % among factors. Out of all school climate factors, the lowest variation was noticed by Lack of Sense of belonging which was only 1%, whereas an Anti- bullying Attitude depicted the highest variation with 7%. Alongside, school climate categories some demographic variables, Gender, and ESCS, as well as the outcomes of interest PVMMATH, PVMSCIE, and PVMREAD were also included in the descriptive statistics. In this matter, schools approximately had similar small gender variation, whereas socio-economic status and scores for outcomes of interest had strong variation. The reasons behind this finding will be discussed and summarized while elaborating on the main research question.
Sample 1

Related to Summary of research findings

  • COVID-19 Protocols Contractor will abide by all applicable COVID-19 protocols set forth in the District’s Reopening and COVID-19 Mitigation Plan and the safety guidelines for COVID-19 prevention established by the California Department of Public Health and the Ventura County Department of Public Health.

  • Research Use The Requester agrees that if access is approved, (1) the PI named in the DAR and (2) those named in the “Senior/Key Person Profile” section of the DAR, including the Information Technology Director and any trainee, employee, or contractor1 working on the proposed research project under the direct oversight of these individuals, shall become Approved Users of the requested dataset(s). Research use will occur solely in connection with the approved research project described in the DAR, which includes a 1-2 paragraph description of the proposed research (i.e., a Research Use Statement). Investigators interested in using Cloud Computing for data storage and analysis must request permission to use Cloud Computing in the DAR and identify the Cloud Service Provider (CSP) or providers and/or Private Cloud System (PCS) that they propose to use. They must also submit a Cloud Computing Use Statement as part of the DAR that describes the type of service and how it will be used to carry out the proposed research as described in the Research Use Statement. If the Approved Users plan to collaborate with investigators outside the Requester, the investigators at each external site must submit an independent DAR using the same project title and Research Use Statement, and if using the cloud, Cloud Computing Use Statement. New uses of these data outside those described in the DAR will require submission of a new DAR; modifications to the research project will require submission of an amendment to this application (e.g., adding or deleting Requester Collaborators from the Requester, adding datasets to an approved project). Access to the requested dataset(s) is granted for a period of one (1) year, with the option to renew access or close-out a project at the end of that year. Submitting Investigator(s), or their collaborators, who provided the data or samples used to generate controlled-access datasets subject to the NIH GDS Policy and who have Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval and who meet any other study specific terms of access, are exempt from the limitation on the scope of the research use as defined in the DAR.

  • Development Plan document specifying the work program, schedule, and relevant investments required for the Development and the Production of a Discovery or set of Discoveries of Oil and Gas in the Contract Area, including its abandonment.

  • Additional Information for Product Development Projects Outcome of product development efforts, such copyrights and license agreements. • Units sold or projected to be sold in California and outside of California. • Total annual sales or projected annual sales (in dollars) of products developed under the Agreement. • Investment dollars/follow-on private funding as a result of Energy Commission funding. • Patent numbers and applications, along with dates and brief descriptions.  Additional Information for Product Demonstrations: • Outcome of demonstrations and status of technology. • Number of similar installations. • Jobs created/retained as a result of the Agreement.

  • Development Schedule The Project shall substantially comply with the specific timetables and triggers for action set forth in Article 5 of this Agreement. The parties acknowledge that, as provided in G.S. 160A-400.25(b), the failure to meet a commencement or completion date shall not, in and of itself, constitute a material breach of this Agreement pursuant to G.S. 160A-400.27 but must be judged based upon the totality of the circumstances.

  • DEVELOPMENT OR ASSISTANCE IN DEVELOPMENT OF SPECIFICATIONS REQUIREMENTS/ STATEMENTS OF WORK Firms and/or individuals that assisted in the development or drafting of the specifications, requirements, statements of work, or solicitation documents contained herein are excluded from competing for this solicitation. This shall not be applicable to firms and/or individuals providing responses to a publicly posted Request for Information (RFI) associated with a solicitation.

  • Development Plans 4.3.1 For each Licensed Indication and corresponding Licensed Product in the Field, Licensee will prepare and deliver to Licensor a development plan and budget (each a “Development Plan”). The initial Development Plans for each Licensed Indication will be delivered within […***…] after the Grant Date for such Licensed Indication.

  • Research, Science and Technology Cooperation 1. The aims of cooperation in research, science and technology, carried out in the mutual interest of the Parties and in compliance with their policies, will be: (a) to build on existing agreements already in place for cooperation on research, science and technology; (b) to encourage, where appropriate, government agencies, research institutions, universities, private companies and other research organizations in the Parties to conclude direct arrangements in support of cooperative activities, programs or projects within the framework of this Agreement, specially related to trade and commerce; and (c) to focus cooperative activities towards sectors where mutual and complementary interests exist, with special emphasis on information and communication technologies and software development to facilitate trade between the Parties. 2. The Parties will encourage and facilitate, as appropriate, the following activities including, but not limited to:

  • SCOPE OF SERVICES/CASE HANDLING A. Upon execution by Xxxxxx, Attorneys are retained to provide legal services for the purpose of seeking damages and other relief in the Litigation. Client agrees that Xxxxxx may choose to associate additional law firm(s) and/or lawyer(s) to represent Client in connection with the investigation and prosecution of the rights Client has as a purchaser of publically traded securities of Xxxxxx, and Client understands that such representation shall be on the same terms as those described in this agreement.

  • Technology Research Analyst Job# 1810 General Characteristics Maintains a strong understanding of the enterprise’s IT systems and architectures. Assists in the analysis of the requirements for the enterprise and applying emerging technologies to support long-term business objectives. Responsible for researching, collecting, and disseminating information on emerging technologies and key learnings throughout the enterprise. Researches and recommends changes to foundation architecture. Supports research projects to identify and evaluate emerging technologies. Interfaces with users and staff to evaluate possible implementation of the new technology in the enterprise, consistent with the goal of improving existing systems and technologies and in meeting the needs of the business. Analyzes and researches process of deployment and assists in this process.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.