Conclusion and Implications Sample Clauses

Conclusion and Implications. In summary, the findings and discussion conclude two important things: The first finding is about an agreement for the procurement of goods and services in the application of civil law to prevent corruption during the Covid-19 pandemic. Contract agreements for the procurement of goods/services that can trigger corruption are contract agreements that have a large budget, such as covid-19 assistance funds. Civil law articles confirming the criminal act of corruption at the time of Covid-19 are contained in the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) issuing Circular (SE) Number 8 of 2020 concerning Use of Budgets for Procurement of Goods/Services in the Context of Accelerating Handling of Corona Virus Disease 2019 (Covid-19) Regarding the Prevention of Corruption Crime. The regulations relevant to the research elaborate three things; 1) the new changes and designs made by LKPP are in the context of realizing sustainable development in spite of the Covid-19 situation; 2) disclosure of public information as a form of transparency and accountability in efforts to prevent corruption, collusion and nepotism; and 3) imposing strict sanctions for fraudulent actors who breach the contract agreement is comprehensible and noted as the government’s consistency and perseverance with fighting against corruptions. The second finding reveals the reasons for good faith are very important in the Contract even though there are unclear statements to justify the reasons. Several articles in the agreement identify principles and ethics in the implementation of the procurement of goods and services. Both instruments are part of good faith. In other words, the importance of good faith. In other words, good faith is basically part of government regulations in achieving national development goals. The point of why good faith is so important in a contract is to avoid breaches and reduce losses suffered by both parties. This can practically be an effort to prevent corruption in Indonesia. Xxxxxxxx, X. Nurhadi. (2020). Bareskim Temukan 102 Kasus Dugaan Penyelewengan Xxxx Bansos Covid-19. Retrived date 08/09/2020 from xxxxx://xxxx.xxxxx.xxx/berita/d- 5109929/bareskrim-temukan-102-kasus-dugaan-penyelewengan-xxxx-xxxxxx-covid-19 Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxx.,&Azanlerigu, X. Xxxxxxxxxx. (2017). A longitudinal outlook of violations ofGhana's Public Procurement Law, Act (663) 2003. International Journal of Procurement Management, 10(1), 38-50. xxxxx://xxx.xxx/10.1504/IJPM.2017.080910. Xxxxxxxx, N., & Xxx...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Conclusion and Implications. This chapter reviewed the literature on globalisation that relates to the impact felt by local areas, the structures of the local government and the agency of the local elected officials. Specifically, it explores the impact of a shift from welfare to competition state, the rise and implications of global cities on local areas, and how the theory for transnational neopluralism provides a window by which a better understanding of how -­‐ and why -­‐ local elected officials are participating in the global economy can be gained. As the central case study of this research, described in Chapter Five, looking at three London local authorities, the impact of the EU is also examined in relation to multi-­‐level governance theory and EU networking activity. This allows an analysis of whether a distinction between local agency and structure at the EU level versus global exists. Xxxxx Xxxx (2010) has described the new individual democratic participant of the 21st century as a ‘cosmopolitan’, influencing government and economics in a way that is cross-­‐cultural, compromising and inclusive beyond geographic nation-­‐ state boundaries for mutual benefit. Held refers to these participants as belonging to ‘communities of fate’. Local areas across the developed world are finding themselves in similar situations, having to do more with less while attempting to provide for their residents and spur economic vitality in an internationally regulated economy. In examining the impact and transformations of globalisation at the local level, it is important to first understand the changes that have evolved at the EU and global level and the theories that facilitate an explanation of these changes. This research has been informed by a number of strains of institutionalist theory, including the shift from welfare to competition states, the framework for global cities, the model of transnational neopluralism and the impact of European integration. At the supranational level, institutionalist theory provides a broader perspective into the complex interactions and dependencies which occur at the global level and impact on local transformations. This is achieved by examining economics through a lens of behaviour and, although controversial, considering political motivations as well as pure market analysis. It also provides a perspective on the rise and fall of several international institutions as well as ones that have endured over the last century. Importantly, it helps explain the ch...
Conclusion and Implications. ‌ The purpose of this qualitative study was to investigate teachers’ perceptions and educational experiences with twice-exceptional students and the factors that influence the teachers’ opinion about twice-exceptional students on the use of gifted curriculum in a school for the gifted and talented in south Kazakhstan. In this chapter, conclusions presented based on the analysis of collected data. This chapter also discusses the current study’s limitations, recommendations for further research, and implications for theory, policy and practice. The educational experience of twice-exceptional students is impacted by the level of public awareness and social beliefs. The topic of twice-exceptionality is a myth to Kazakhstani teachers because there is limited research and almost no credible information of twice-exceptionality in Kazakhstani context. In many contexts, inclusive education continues to be plagued by contradictions, controversies, dilemmas and anomalies (Xxxxxxxx, 2014; Slee, 2018). The State Program for Development 2011-2020 is devoted to the unique goal of implementing inclusive education in mainstream schools. Due to this reason, serving gifted students who have being identified as twice-exceptional is an important topic to address and understand. This research is on teachers’ experience of working with a twice-exceptional student and how to support and implement the gifted curriculum. The major finding of this thesis is that there is considerable disagreement between teachers’ perceptions of the phenomenon of twice-exceptionality and their current practice with twice-exceptional students. The interviews provided data on teachers’ consciousness of their own role in teaching and educating gifted students other exceptionalities such as cerebral palsy. However, as lesson observations illustrate, teachers’ perceptions and beliefs of twice-exceptional students do not match the approaches they are using to teach twice-exceptional students. The main reasons of such inconsistency are related to the teachers’ either ignoring the disability or giving too much focus to it and failing to develop their giftedness. It implies that teachers can easily misdiagnose the exceptionalities of students because disabilities often mask the giftedness (Beckley,1998). Another finding demonstrates that positive school environment impacts the academic performance of twice-exceptional students. Teachers added that scaffolding pair or group work enhances the academic knowledg...
Conclusion and Implications. The findings in this study suggest that South Asian Americans may have higher levels of weight loss self-efficacy, especially in higher BMI groups. This reflects positively on the potential for South Asian Americans at risk of diabetes to effectively engage in interventions involving lifestyle or behavior change. This study also suggests a strong perceived control over developing diabetes in South Asian Americans, further supporting the potential for successful engagement in lifestyle change interventions.
Conclusion and Implications. The previous chapter discussed the findings with regard to international literature on student discourse. The purpose of this qualitative study is to explore teachers’ perceptions and implementation practices of student discourse in a selective school in Nur- Sultan. In this chapter, conclusions are drawn based on the gathered data. This chapter combines the results of the present study in the context of three research questions placing emphasis on limitations, recommendations for further research and implications. Student discourse is an academic term for all types of talk and conversation that take place in classroom. Discourse in classroom can be conducted in the form of pair work, small or large groups, debates, roundtable discussion, dialogue, classroom discussions. Spoken discourse can successfully be linked to writing, listening and reading tasks. Discourse can as well include peer assessment, peer feedback and questioning or dialogic teaching because they stimulate discussions. Two teachers of English and two teachers of Kazakh in a selective school in Nur-Sultan were interviewed and their lessons were observed in order to find out how they perceive student discourse and implement it in their practice. In general, participants realize the role of student discourse in teaching English and Kazakh languages. In other words, they perceive its role as indispensable and vital. They were familiar with the term “discussion”, but have heard of “student discourse” except for one participant. They also were aware of many forms and types of student discourse. Most of the participants, especially ones with more teaching experience use discourse techniques effectively in their practice. The participants with more than 20 years of experience are also expert teachers which explains their motivation and aspiration to refine their art of teaching. Each of them has their own philosophy of teaching but in general, are similar in their attitude towards pedagogy and students. One of the participants (20 years of experience) effectively implements discourse practices to develop research skill in students whereas the other expert teacher successfully practices discourse techniques in order to increase students’ academic achievement. The only omission of both expert teachers was negligence of noise levels, space and seating arrangements which is very important for productive classroom discourse. It was noticed that students were not facing each other and listening as atten...
Conclusion and Implications 

Related to Conclusion and Implications

  • Independent Investigation Subscriber, in making the decision to purchase the Units, has relied upon an independent investigation of the Company and has not relied upon any information or representations made by any third parties or upon any oral or written representations or assurances from the Company, its officers, directors or employees or any other representatives or agents of the Company, other than as set forth in this Agreement. Subscriber is familiar with the business, operations and financial condition of the Company and has had an opportunity to ask questions of, and receive answers from the Company’s officers and directors concerning the Company and the terms and conditions of the offering of the Units and has had full access to such other information concerning the Company as Subscriber has requested. Subscriber confirms that all documents that it has requested have been made available and that Subscriber has been supplied with all of the additional information concerning this investment which Subscriber has requested.

  • Access to Information; Independent Investigation Prior to the execution of this Agreement, the Subscriber has had the opportunity to ask questions of and receive answers from representatives of the Company concerning an investment in the Company, as well as the finances, operations, business and prospects of the Company, and the opportunity to obtain additional information to verify the accuracy of all information so obtained. In determining whether to make this investment, Subscriber has relied solely on Subscriber’s own knowledge and understanding of the Company and its business based upon Subscriber’s own due diligence investigation and the information furnished pursuant to this paragraph. Subscriber understands that no person has been authorized to give any information or to make any representations which were not furnished pursuant to this Section 2 and Subscriber has not relied on any other representations or information in making its investment decision, whether written or oral, relating to the Company, its operations and/or its prospects.

  • Inspections and Tests 26.1 The Supplier shall at its own expense and at no cost to the Procuring Entity carry out all such tests and/or inspections of the Goods and Related Services as are specified in the SCC. 26.2 The inspections and tests may be conducted on the premises of the Supplier or its Subcontractor, at point of delivery, and/or at the Goods' final destination, or in another place in Kenya as specified in the SCC. Subject to GCC Sub-Clause 26.3, if conducted on the premises of the Supplier or its Subcontractor, all reasonable facilities and assistance, including access to drawings and production data, shall be furnished to the inspectors at no charge to the Procuring Entity. 26.3 The Procuring Entity or its designated representative shall be entitled to attend the tests and/or inspections referred to in GCC Sub-Clause 26.2, provided that the Procuring Entity bear all of its own costs and expenses incurred in connection with such attendance including, but not limited to, all travelling and board and lodging expenses. 26.4 Whenever the Supplier is ready to carry out any such test and inspection, it shall give a reasonable advance notice, including the place and time, to the Procuring Entity. The Supplier shall obtain from any relevant third party or manufacturer any necessary permission or consent to enable the Procuring Entity or its designated representative to attend the test and/or inspection. 26.5 The Procuring Entity may require the Supplier to carry out any test and/or inspection not required by the Contract but deemed necessary to verify that the characteristics and performance of the Goods comply with the technical specifications codes and standards under the Contract, provided that the Supplier's reasonable costs and expenses incurred in the carrying out of such test and/or inspection shall be added to the Contract Price. Further, if such test and/or inspection impedes the progress of manufacturing and/or the Supplier's performance of its other obligations under the Contract, due allowance will be made in respect of the Delivery Dates and Completion Dates and the other obligations so affected. 26.6 The Supplier shall provide the Procuring Entity with a report of the results of any such test and/or inspection. 26.7 The Procuring Entity may reject any Goods or any part thereof that fail to pass any test and/or inspection or do not conform to the specifications. The Supplier shall either rectify or replace such rejected Goods or parts thereof or make alterations necessary to meet the specifications at no cost to the Procuring Entity, and shall repeat the test and/or inspection, at no cost to the Procuring Entity, upon giving a notice pursuant to GCC Sub- Clause 26.4. 26.8 The Supplier agrees that neither the execution of a test and/or inspection of the Goods or any part thereof, nor the attendance by the Procuring Entity or its representative, nor the issue of any report pursuant to GCC Sub-Clause 26.6, shall release the Supplier from any warranties or other obligations under the Contract.

  • Investigations and Remediations Lessor shall retain the responsibility and pay for any investigations or remediation measures required by governmental entities having jurisdiction with respect to the existence of Hazardous Substances on the Premises prior to the Start Date, unless such remediation measure is required as a result of Lessee's use (including "Alterations", as defined in Paragraph 7.3(a) below) of the Premises, in which event Lessee shall be responsible for such payment. Lessee shall cooperate fully in any such activities at the request of Lessor, including allowing Lessor and Lessor's agents to have reasonable access to the Premises at reasonable times in order to carry out Lessor's investigative and remedial responsibilities.

  • Inspection and Tests 3.8.1 The Procuring entity or its representative shall have the right to inspect and/or to test the goods to confirm their conformity to the Contract specifications. The Procuring entity shall notify the tenderer in writing in a timely manner, of the identity of any representatives retained for these purposes. 3.8.2 The inspections and tests may be conducted in the premises of the tenderer or its subcontractor(s), at point of delivery, and/or at the Goods’ final destination If conducted on the premises of the tenderer or its subcontractor(s), all reasonable facilities and assistance, including access to drawings and production data, shall be furnished to the inspectors at no charge to the Procuring entity. 3.8.3 Should any inspected or tested goods fail to conform to the Specifications, the Procuring entity may reject the equipment, and the tenderer shall either replace the rejected equipment or make alterations necessary to make specification requirements free of costs to the Procuring entity. 3.8.4 The Procuring entity’s right to inspect, test and where necessary, reject the goods after the Goods’ arrival shall in no way be limited or waived by reason of the equipment having previously been inspected, tested and passed by the Procuring entity or its representative prior to the equipment delivery. 3.8.5 Nothing in paragraph 3.8 shall in any way release the tenderer from any warranty or other obligations under this Contract.

  • Information and Inspection Pledgor shall (i) promptly furnish Bank any information with respect to the Collateral requested by Bank; (ii) allow Bank or its representatives to inspect and copy, or furnish Bank or its representatives with copies of, all records relating to the Collateral and the Obligation; and (iii) promptly furnish Bank or its representatives with any other information Bank may reasonably request.

  • Inspection and Testing Each Constructing Entity shall cause inspection and testing of the Interconnection Facilities that it constructs in accordance with the provisions of this section. The Construction Parties acknowledge and agree that inspection and testing of facilities may be undertaken as facilities are completed and need not await completion of all of the facilities that a Constructing Entity is building.

  • Search, Enquiry, Investigation, Examination And Verification a. The Property is sold on an “as is where is basis” subject to all the necessary inspection, search (including but not limited to the status of title), enquiry (including but not limited to the terms of consent to transfer and/or assignment and outstanding charges), investigation, examination and verification of which the Purchaser is already advised to conduct prior to the auction and which the Purchaser warrants to the Assignee has been conducted by the Purchaser’s independent legal advisors at the time of execution of the Memorandum. b. The intending bidder or the Purchaser is responsible at own costs and expenses to make and shall be deemed to have carried out own search, enquiry, investigation, examination and verification on all liabilities and encumbrances affecting the Property, the title particulars as well as the accuracy and correctness of the particulars and information provided. c. The Purchaser shall be deemed to purchase the Property in all respects subject thereto and shall also be deemed to have full knowledge of the state and condition of the Property regardless of whether or not the said search, enquiry, investigation, examination and verification have been conducted. d. The Purchaser shall be deemed to have read, understood and accepted these Conditions of Sale prior to the auction and to have knowledge of all matters which would have been disclosed thereby and the Purchaser expressly warrants to the Assignee that the Purchaser has sought independent legal advice on all matters pertaining to this sale and has been advised by his/her/its independent legal advisor of the effect of all the Conditions of Sale. e. Neither the Assignee nor the Auctioneer shall be required or bound to inform the Purchaser of any such matters whether known to them or not and the Purchaser shall raise no enquiry, requisition or objection thereon or thereto.

  • INSPECTION AND REJECTION 8.1 Purchaser shall have the right to inspect and test Products at any time prior to shipment, and within a reasonable time after delivery to the Purchaser’s Destination. Products not inspected within a reasonable time after delivery shall be deemed accepted by Purchaser. The payment for Products shall in no way impair the right of Purchaser to reject nonconforming Products, or to avail itself of any other remedies to which it may be entitled. 8.2 If any of the Products are found at any time to be defective in material or workmanship, damaged, or otherwise not in conformity with the requirements of this Agreement or any applicable Purchase Order, as its exclusive remedy, Purchaser may at its option and at Vendor’s sole cost and expense, elect either to (i) return any damaged, non-conforming or defective Products to Vendor for correction or replacement, or (ii) require Vendor to inspect the Products and remove or replace damaged, non-conforming or defective Products with conforming Products. If Purchaser elects option (ii) in the preceding sentence and Vendor fails promptly to make the necessary inspection, removal and replacement, Purchaser, at its option, may inspect the Products and Vendor shall bear the cost thereof. Payment by Purchaser of any invoice shall not constitute acceptance of the Products covered by such invoice, and acceptance by Purchaser shall not relieve Vendor of its warranties or other obligations under this Agreement. 8.3 The provisions of this Article shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement.

  • Investigation and Prevention DST shall reasonably assist Fund in investigating of any such unauthorized access and shall use commercially reasonable efforts to: (A) cooperate with Fund in its efforts to comply with statutory notice or other legal obligations applicable to Fund or its clients arising out of unauthorized access and to seek injunctive or other equitable relief; (B) cooperate with Fund in litigation and investigations against third parties reasonably necessary to protect its proprietary rights; and (C) take reasonable actions necessary to mitigate loss from any such authorized access.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!