Common use of Task Order Execution Clause in Contracts

Task Order Execution. Execution of a Task Order by the Practitioner Partner shall be evidence of such Practitioner Partner’s approval of the following items: (1) subcontractors pursuant to Sections 3.3 (b) and (e)(8) of the Consortium Contract, subject to final compliance with PPB Rule requirements and Sections 2.07, 3.02 and 4.07 of Appendix A, (2) compensation beyond three months and/or utilizing a percentage equivalent of academic contract effort pursuant to Section 3.3(e)(1) of the Consortium Contract, (3) treating components of an Academic Partner’s facilities and administration as a direct cost pursuant to Section 3.3 (e)(2) of the Consortium Contract, (4) the purchase of equipment and post-Project ownership of such equipment pursuant to Section 3.3 (e)(6) of the Consortium Contract, (5) the incurrence of expenses related to long-distance travel pursuant to Section 3.3 (e)(7) of the Consortium Contract, to be reimbursed, in the case of City Agency Requestors, pursuant to the provisions of Article 4 of the Consortium Contract, (6) the incurrence of expenses related to computer services pursuant to Section 3.3 (e)(9) of the Consortium Contract, and (7) the application of the formula to determine indirect costs pursuant to Section 3.3(e)(10) of the Consortium Contract.

Task Order Execution. Execution of a this Task Order by the Practitioner Partner shall will be evidence of such Practitioner Partner’s approval of the following items: (1) subcontractors pursuant to Sections 3.3 (b) and (e)(8) of the Consortium Contract, subject to final compliance with PPB Rule requirements and Sections 2.07, 3.02 and 4.07 of Appendix A, (2) compensation beyond three months and/or utilizing a percentage equivalent of academic contract effort pursuant to Section 3.3(e)(1) of the Consortium Contract, (3) treating components of an Academic Partner’s facilities and administration as a direct cost pursuant to Section 3.3 (e)(2) of the Consortium Contract, (4) the purchase of equipment and post-Project ownership of such equipment pursuant to Section 3.3 (e)(6) of the Consortium Contract, (5) the incurrence of expenses related to long-distance travel pursuant to Section 3.3 (e)(7) of the Consortium Contract, to be reimbursed, in the case of City Agency Requestors, pursuant to the provisions of Article 4 of the Consortium Contract, (6) the incurrence of expenses related to computer services pursuant to Section 3.3 (e)(9) of the Consortium Contract, and (7) the application of the formula to determine indirect costs pursuant to Section 3.3(e)(10) of the Consortium Contract.

Task Order Execution. Execution of a resulting Task Order by the Practitioner Partner Requestor shall be evidence of such Practitioner Partner’s its approval of the following items, as explicitly noted above in this Proposal in Response: (1) subcontractors pursuant to Sections 3.3 (b) and (e)(8) of the Consortium Contract, subject to final compliance with PPB Rule requirements and Sections 2.07, 3.02 and 4.07 of Appendix A, (2) compensation beyond three months and/or utilizing a percentage equivalent of academic contract effort pursuant to Section 3.3(e)(1) of the Consortium Contract, (3) treating components of an Academic Partner’s facilities and administration as a direct cost pursuant to Section 3.3 (e)(2) of the Consortium Contract, (4) the purchase of equipment and post-Project ownership of such equipment pursuant to Section 3.3 (e)(6) of the Consortium Contract, (5) the incurrence of expenses related to long-distance travel pursuant to Section 3.3 (e)(7) of the Consortium Contract, to be reimbursed, in the case of City Agency Requestors, pursuant to the provisions of Article 4 of the Consortium Contract, (6) the incurrence of expenses related to computer services pursuant to Section 3.3 (e)(9) of the Consortium Contract, and (7) the application of the formula to determine indirect costs pursuant to Section 3.3(e)(10) of the Consortium Contract.