that Librarians be evaluated on the criteria listed in section 19.12.1 in a ratio of 80:10:10 respectively; and
that Librarians be evaluated on Sample Clauses
Related to that Librarians be evaluated on
Written Evaluation The Superintendent in consultation with the Board shall review and assess the Administrator’s performance on or before February 1 of each year. The Administrator shall be formally evaluated in writing annually by the Superintendent on or before February 1 of each year. The evaluation shall include a description of the Administrator’s duties and responsibilities and the standards to which the Administrator is to perform. It shall consider the Administrator’s specific duties, responsibilities, management and competence as an Administrator; specify the Administrator’s strengths and weaknesses with supporting reasons; align with research based standards established by the Illinois State Board of Education and use data and indicators on student growth as a significant factor in rating performance. The evaluation shall also consist of a review of the Administrator’s progress toward meeting established professional, student performance and academic goals set forth in Appendix A and a review of the Administrator’s leadership and management performance relative to his current assignment. The written evaluation shall be signed by both the Superintendent and the Administrator. The Administrator may respond to the evaluation in writing and such response shall be attached to and included in the Administrator’s personnel file.
Self-Evaluation Each regular faculty member shall provide a self-evaluation. It shall address, among other items, the faculty member's fulfillment of professional responsibilities as referenced in Section 18.2.3 and an assessment of his or her own performance. The faculty member will share the self-evaluation with the Faculty Evaluation Committee and the first-level manager or designee. The self-evaluation will become part of the evaluation report.
Evidence Used In Evaluation The following categories of evidence shall be used in evaluating each Educator:
Technical Standards Applicable to a Wind Generating Plant i. Low Voltage Ride-Through (LVRT) Capability A wind generating plant shall be able to remain online during voltage disturbances up to the time periods and associated voltage levels set forth in the standard below. The LVRT standard provides for a transition period standard and a post-transition period standard.
JOC Pricing of Itemized List of Means Non-Prepriced Items” based on the information herein. This Addendum is only to correct a misstatement on the original optional attachment entitled “PART 2 JOC Pricing of Itemized List of Means Non-Prepriced Items.” The attachment mistakenly provided for and discussed “Attribute 39.” Specifically, any erroneous reference to “Attribute 39” on the specified attachment should be considered immediately replaced with “the Attribute Question asking for Pricing for Markup of Non- Prepriced Items in RS Means Unit Price Book.” Please disregard any reference to Attribute 39 on this optional form and consider it to be referencing the Attribute Question asking for “Pricing for Markup of Non-Prepriced Items in RS Means Unit Price Book” instead. TIPS RFP 220106 Comprehensive HVAC (2 Part with JOC) ALL INFORMATION MUST BE TYPED AND FORM MUST BE UPLOADED IN EXCEL FORMAT. DO NOT HANDWRITE REFERENCES AND DO NOT CONVERT EXCEL REFERENCES Please provide five (5) references from five different entities, preferably from school districts or other governmental entities who have u the last three years. Additional references may be required. DO NOT INCLUDE TIPS EMPLOYEES AS A REFERENCE. Verify your references emails are deliverable and that they agree to provide a reference. Failure to do this may delay the evaluation process. You may provide more than five (5) references. Entity Name Contact Person VALID EMAIL IS REQUIRED Phone Little Rock School District Xxxx Xxxxx xxxxxxx.xxxxx@xxxx.xxx 000-000-0000 North Little Rock Xxxxxx Xxxxx xxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx 000-000-0000 City of Xxxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxx xxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx 000-000-0000 Xxxxx Springs Baptist Church Xxxx Xxxxxx xxxxxxx@xxxxx.xxx 000-000-0000 Bryant School District Dr. Xxxxx Xxxxxxx xxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx 000-000-0000 TIPS RFP # 220106 Required Confidential Information Status Form Middleton Inc. dba Middleton Heat & Air Name of company Xxxx Xxxxxx, Sales Manager Printed Name and Title of authorized company officer declaring below the confidential status of material 22039 Interstate 30 Bryant AR 72022 501-529-1055 Address City State ZIP Phone ALL VENDORS MUST COMPLETE THE ABOVE SECTION CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION SUBMITTED IN RESPONSE TO COMPETITIVE PROCUREMENT REQUESTS OF EDUCATION SERVICE CENTER REGION 8 AND TIPS (ESC8) IS GOVERNED BY TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE, CHAPTER 552 If you consider any portion of your proposal to be confidential information and not subject to public disclosure pursuant to Chapter 552 Texas Gov't Code or other law(s), you must attach a copy of all claimed confidential materials within your proposal and put this COMPLETED form as a cover sheet to said materials then scan, name “CONFIDENTIAL” and upload with your proposal submission. (You must include all the confidential information in the submitted proposal. The copy uploaded is to indicate which material in your proposal, if any, you deem confidential in the event the receives a Public Information Request.) ESC8 and TIPS will follow procedures of controlling statute(s) regarding any claim of confidentiality and shall not be liable for any release of information required by law. Upon your claim and your defense to the Office of Texas Attorney General is required to make the final determination whether the information submitted by you and held by ESC8 and TIPS is confidential and exempt from public disclosure. ALL VENDORS MUST COMPLETE ONE OF THE TWO OPTIONS BELOW. OPTION 1: I DO CLAIM parts of my proposal to be confidential and DO NOT desire to expressly waive a claim of confidentiality of all information contained within our response to the solicitation. The attached contains material from our proposal that I classify and deem confidential under Texas Gov't Code Sec. 552 or other law(s) and I invoke my statutory rights to confidential treatment of the enclosed materials. IF CLAIMING PARTS OF YOUR PROPOSAL CONFIDENTIAL, YOU MUST ATTACH THE SHEETS TO THIS FORM AND LIST THE NUMBER OT TOTAL PAGES THAT ARE CONFIDENTIAL. ATTACHED ARE COPIES OF PAGES OF CLAIMED CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL FROM OUR PROPOSAL THAT WE DEEM TO BE NOT PUBLIC INFORMATION AND WILL DEFEND THAT CLAIM TO THE TEXAS ATTORNEY GENERAL IF REQUESTED WHEN A PUBLIC INFORMATION REQUEST IS MADE FOR OUR PROPOSAL. Signature Date OR OPTION 2: I DO NOT CLAIM any of my proposal to be confidential, complete the section below.
Selection of projects and financial parameters 4.1 Open calls and availability of funds (including number of calls, duration of calls, and estimated size):
Administrative Evaluation It is the intent of the SCD administration to conduct evaluations of non-priority- hire faculty as early as possible in a faculty member's employment in an SCD instructional unit. Administrative evaluation should occur before the beginning of the fifth quarter within the nine (9) out of twelve (12) quarter sequence outlined in Article 10.7.a.
Summative Evaluation An evaluation used to arrive at a rating on each standard, an overall rating, and as a basis to make personnel decisions. The summative evaluation includes the Evaluator’s judgments of the Educator’s performance against Performance Standards and the Educator’s attainment of goals set forth in the Educator’s Plan.
Authorized User Overview and Mini-Bid Process Project Based IT Consulting Services Contracts enable Authorized Users to use a competitive Mini-bid Process to acquire Services on an as-needed basis, for qualified IT Projects. Project Based IT Consulting Services may include, but will not be limited to projects requiring: analysis, data classification, design, development, testing, quality assurance, security and associated training for Information Technology based applications. See section 1.3 Out of Scope Work for a listing of projects expressly excluded from the scope of this Contract. An Authorized User Agreement for Project Based IT Consulting Services will be governed first by the terms and conditions specified in the OGS Centralized Contract and second by terms and conditions added to the Authorized User Statement of Work. Additional terms and conditions shall not conflict with or modify the terms and conditions of the OGS Centralized Contract. NYS Executive Agencies must adhere to all internal processes and approvals including, as required, approval from NYS Office of Information Technology Services. Other Authorized Users must adhere to their own internal processes and approvals. In accordance with Appendix B, section 28, Modification of Contract Terms, an Authorized User may add additional required terms and conditions to this Mini-Bid and resultant Authorized User Agreement only if such terms and conditions (1) are more favorable to the Authorized User and (2) do not conflict with or supersede the OGS Centralized Contract terms and conditions. Examples of additional terms and conditions include: • Expedited delivery timeframe; • Additional incentives, such as discount for expedited payment/Procurement Card use; and • Any additional requirements imposed by the funding source or Federal law.
GRIEVANCE REPORT Attachment I (Grievance Report) will be used in the processing of all grievances.
