The Protocol P-Pas Sample Clauses

The Protocol P-Pas. To avoid cross-group attacks, we modify TTKEM so that a commit evolves all key pairs in the LT. For this, we first replace the standard encryption scheme 16 This attack can be easily extended to C’s leaf not being a direct child of the root. by HIBE. That is, each node, instead of labels epk and esk, has two public mpk and i→d, as well as one private label hsk. In the order listed, these labels contain a (master) HIBE public key, and a HIBE identity vector and the corresponding HIBE secret key for identity i→d. Encryption for a node is done with mpk and i→d. Whenever a new key pair is created for an internal node (e.g. during rekeying), the node’s i→d is initialized to the empty string. For leaf nodes, the first ID in the vector i→d is set to the ID of the user assigned to that leaf. Second, we can now evolve all keys with every commit: For nodes whose keys does not get replaced with the commit, we simply append the the hash of the commit message H3(c) to the HIBE ID vectors, and update all secret keys on the processor’s direct path accordingly. Intuitively, this provides forward secrecy for individual HIBE keys in the LT. First, HIBE schemes ensure that secret keys for an ID vector can not be used to derive secrets for prefixes of that ID vector. So, the HIBE key of a node can not be used to derive its keys from previous epochs. Second, this guarantees in the event the group is split into parallel epochs (by delivering different commit messages to different group members) that the keys of a node in one epoch can not be used to derive the keys for that node in any parallel epochs. That is because, more generally, HIBE schemes ensure that secret keys for an ID vector i→d can not be used to derive keys for any other ID vector i→d′ unless i→d is a prefix of i→d′. But as soon as parallel epochs are created, the resulting ID vectors of any given node in both LTs have different commit messages in them at the same coordinate ensuring that no such vector is a prefix of another. We prove two statements about P-Pas. First, if the hash functions are mod- eled as non-programmable random oracles, then the protocol realizes the relaxed functionality that restricts the environment not to perform certain corruptions. Second, for programmable random oracles it achieves full UC security. Formally, we obtain the following theorems, proven in the full version [5].
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to The Protocol P-Pas

  • COVID-19 Protocols Contractor will abide by all applicable COVID-19 protocols set forth in the District’s Reopening and COVID-19 Mitigation Plan and the safety guidelines for COVID-19 prevention established by the California Department of Public Health and the Ventura County Department of Public Health.

  • Signaling protocol The Parties will interconnect their networks using SS7 signaling where Technically Feasible and available as defined in GR 905 Telcordia Standards including ISDN User Part (ISUP) for trunk signaling and TCAP for CCS-based features in the Interconnection of their networks. All Network Operations Forum (NOF) adopted standards shall be adhered to. Where available, CenturyLink signaling services to link its Signaling Transfer Points (STPs) for CLEC switches which connect to CenturyLink’s STPs via “A” links or for CLEC’s STPs to connect to CenturyLink’s STPs via “D” links which are dedicated to the transport of signaling for local Interconnection, may be ordered from the CenturyLink Tariff.

  • Drug Testing Procedures a. The testing procedures and safeguards provided in this policy shall be adhered to by any laboratory personnel administering departmental drug tests.

  • Access Toll Connecting Trunk Group Architecture 9.2.1 If CBB chooses to subtend a Verizon access Tandem, CBB’s NPA/NXX must be assigned by CBB to subtend the same Verizon access Tandem that a Verizon NPA/NXX serving the same Rate Center Area subtends as identified in the LERG.

  • Joint Network Implementation and Grooming Process Upon request of either Party, the Parties shall jointly develop an implementation and grooming process (the “Joint Grooming Process” or “Joint Process”) which may define and detail, inter alia:

  • System Access Control Data processing systems used to provide the Cloud Service must be prevented from being used without authorization. Measures: • Multiple authorization levels are used when granting access to sensitive systems, including those storing and processing Personal Data. Authorizations are managed via defined processes according to the SAP Security Policy • All personnel access SAP’s systems with a unique identifier (user ID). • SAP has procedures in place so that requested authorization changes are implemented only in accordance with the SAP Security Policy (for example, no rights are granted without authorization). In case personnel leaves the company, their access rights are revoked. • SAP has established a password policy that prohibits the sharing of passwords, governs responses to password disclosure, and requires passwords to be changed on a regular basis and default passwords to be altered. Personalized user IDs are assigned for authentication. All passwords must fulfill defined minimum requirements and are stored in encrypted form. In the case of domain passwords, the system forces a password change every six months in compliance with the requirements for complex passwords. Each computer has a password-protected screensaver. • The company network is protected from the public network by firewalls. • SAP uses up–to-date antivirus software at access points to the company network (for e-mail accounts), as well as on all file servers and all workstations. • Security patch management is implemented to provide regular and periodic deployment of relevant security updates. Full remote access to SAP’s corporate network and critical infrastructure is protected by strong authentication.

  • Access to Network Interface Device (NID 2.4.3.1. Due to the wide variety of NIDs utilized by BellSouth (based on subscriber size and environmental considerations), Mpower may access the on-premises wiring by any of the following means: BellSouth shall allow Mpower to connect its loops directly to BellSouth’s multi-line residential NID enclosures that have additional space and are not used by BellSouth or any other telecommunications carriers to provide service to the premise. Mpower agrees to install compatible protectors and test jacks and to maintain the protection system and equipment and to indemnify BellSouth pursuant to Section 8 of the General Terms and Conditions of this Agreement.

  • Additional Acceptable Uses of Student Data Contractor is prohibited from using Student Data for any secondary use not described in this agreement except:

  • Testing Procedures Testing will be conducted by an outside certified Agency in such a way to ensure maximum accuracy and reliability by using the techniques, chain of custody procedures, equipment and laboratory facilities which have been approved by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. All employees notified of a positive controlled substance or alcohol test result may request an independent test of their split sample at the employee’s expense. If the test result is negative the Employer will reimburse the employee for the cost of the split sample test.

  • System Upgrade Facilities and System Deliverability Upgrades Connecting Transmission Owner shall design, procure, construct, install, and own the System Upgrade Facilities and System Deliverability Upgrades described in Appendix A hereto. The responsibility of the Developer for costs related to System Upgrade Facilities and System Deliverability Upgrades shall be determined in accordance with the provisions of Attachment S to the NYISO OATT.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.