The Xxxxxx-Xxxxxxx Sample Clauses

The Xxxxxx-Xxxxxxx. Key Exchange‌ The Xxxxxx-Xxxxxxx (DH) key distribution algorithm [21] became the breakthrough of modern cryptography. Its security rests on the discrete logarithm assumption, which as- sumes that it’s computationally difficult to solve discrete logarithms modulo very large primes. An eavesdropper who monitors the key exchange will not be able to predict the outcome of the shared key. This is also known as the Xxxxxx-Xxxxxxx problem and thus the DH key exchange fulfills the goal of good key. The algorithm has two public parameters; a prime number p and an integer less than p known as the generator, g. The generator may generate any element in [1, p − 1] when multiplied by itself enough times, modulo p. G is the finite cyclic group with prime order |G| generated by g. If Xxxxx and Xxx wish to agree on a secret key, Xxxxx first chooses a number a (the private key) at random from [1, p − 1] and keeps it secret. She then computes the public key, Pa. Pa = ga (mod p) Xxx also chooses a value b in the same fashion and computes Pb. Pb = gb (mod p) Xxxxx and Xxx now exchange public keys and may then compute the shared secret key using their private keys. K = (Pa)b = (Pb)a (mod p) If an eavesdropper, Eve, is to compute the key using the public values, she must solve the equation K = Pa(log gPb) (mod p) The above equation refers to what is known as the computational Xxxxxx-Xxxxxxx (CDH) problem which states that it’s hard to compute gab even with the knowledge of p, g, ga, and gb. However, CDH alone is not sufficient to ensure the security of Xxxxxx-Xxxxxxx. Eve may still be able to predict a large amount of bits of gab with some confidence. If a shared secret key is to be derived from a block of bits from gab, it is necessary to assume that Eve cannot predict these bits using the known values ga and gb. Formally, this is known as the Decisionial Xxxxxx-Xxxxxxx problem [8]. No algorithm should efficiently be able to distinguish between the two distributions ga, gb, gab and ga, gb, gc , in which gc is randomly distributed in G. Today, the most efficient method for solving the DDH problem is by computing descrete log to test that a triplet ⟨x, y, z⟩ satisfies the Xxxxxx-Xxxxxxx relation.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to The Xxxxxx-Xxxxxxx

  • XX XXXXXXX XXXXXXX the parties hereof have caused this Agreement to be executed in duplicate on the day and year first above written.

  • Xx Xxxxxx No waiver or modification of this Agreement or any of its terms is valid or enforceable unless reduced to writing and signed by the party who is alleged to have waived its rights or to have agreed to a modification.

  • Sxxxxxxx-Xxxxx The Company is, or on the Closing Date will be, in material compliance with the provisions of the Sxxxxxxx-Xxxxx Act of 2002, as amended, and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder and related or similar rules or regulations promulgated by any governmental or self-regulatory entity or agency, that are applicable to it as of the date hereof.

  • Xxxx-Xxxxx-Xxxxxx Notwithstanding any other provision in this Agreement, in the event the Xxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxx Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended (the “HSR Act”), is applicable to any Member by reason of the fact that any assets of the Company will be distributed to such Member in connection with the dissolution of the Company, the distribution of any assets of the Company shall not be consummated until such time as the applicable waiting periods (and extensions thereof) under the HSR Act have expired or otherwise been terminated with respect to each such Member.

  • SOMEC XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX UNBUNDLED LOCAL SWITCHING, PORT USAGE End Office Switching (Port Usage) End Office Switching Function, Per MOU 0.0010519 End Office Trunk Port - Shared, Per MOU 0.0002136 Tandem Switching (Port Usage) (Local or Access Tandem) Tandem Switching Function Per MOU 0.0001634 Tandem Trunk Port - Shared, Per MOU 0.0002863 Tandem Switching Function Per MOU (Melded) 0.00004951 Tandem Trunk Port - Shared, Per MOU (Melded) 0.000086749 Melded Factor: 30.30% of the Tandem Rate Common Transport Common Transport - Per Mile, Per MOU 0.0000045 Common Transport - Facilities Termination Per MOU 0.0004095

  • Xxxx Xxxxxxx Purchase Order and Sales Contact Email 2 Purchase Order and Sales Contact Phone 2 3 Company Website 4 Entity D/B/A's and Assumed Names 5 Primary Address 2 Primary Address City 7 Primary Address State 2 8 Primary Address Zip 9 Search Words Identifying Vendor Certification of Vendor Residency (Required by the State of Texas)

  • Xxxx Xxxxxx Purchase Order and Sales Contact Email 2 2 Purchase Order and Sales Contact Phone 2 3 Company Website 4 Entity D/B/A's and Assumed Names 5 Primary Address 2 6 Primary Address City 7 Primary Address State 2 8 Primary Address Zip 9 Search Words Identifying Vendor Certification of Vendor Residency (Required by the State of Texas)

  • Xxx Xxxxxxx If the Parties do not agree on an Adjudicator the Adjudicator will be appointed by the Arbitration Foundation of Southern Africa (AFSA).

  • Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Purchase Order and Sales Contact Email 2 Purchase Order and Sales Contact Phone 2 3 Company Website 4 Entity D/B/A's and Assumed Names 5 Primary Address 2 6 Primary Address City 7 Primary Address State 2 8 Primary Address Zip 9 Search Words Identifying Vendor Certification of Vendor Residency (Required by the State of Texas)

  • Xxxxx Xxxxxxx Purchase Order and Sales Contact Email 2 2 Purchase Order and Sales Contact Phone 2 3 Company Website 4 Entity D/B/A's and Assumed Names 5 Primary Address 2 Primary Address City 7 Primary Address State 2 8 Primary Address Zip 9 Search Words Identifying Vendor Certification of Vendor Residency (Required by the State of Texas)

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!