Theory of Planned Behaviour Sample Clauses

Theory of Planned Behaviour. The TPB was proposed by Xxxx Xxxxx in order to enhance the Theory of Reasoned Action (TRA) [70], a model for the prediction of behavioural intention (see Figure 1). Through adding the variable of perceived behavioural control the TPB was supposed to improve the predictive power of the TRA. It has emerged as a major framework for understanding, predicting and changing human social behaviour [71]. The theory states that behavioural intention is the immediate antecedent of behaviour, while intention itself is a function of attitude toward behaviour, subjective norm and perceived behavioural control. • Attitude toward behaviour: The degree to which performance of the behaviour is positively or negatively valued. Attitude toward behaviour therefore reflects an individual’s evaluation of self-performance of the behaviour. • Subjective norm: Perceived social pressure to perform or not to perform a certain action. It is determined by the total set of readily accessible normative beliefs • Perceived behavioural control: Belief that a certain behaviour can be performed. Very similar to the concept of self-efficacy [72]. Figure 1 The TPB from Ajzen [70]
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Theory of Planned Behaviour. According to the Theory of Planned Behaviour20 (TPB), a psychological assessment process takes place, when choosing a mode of transport, in which attitudes, values and behaviour standards are relevant. The behaviour is influenced by individual internal and external factors. According to the model21, the intention to use a certain mode of transport is dependent on three attitude-based influencing factors: • subjective evaluation of behaviour (such as attitudes towards the mode of transport) • perceived normative expectations of important other persons (e.g. norms related to car use) • perceived „behavioural control” (perceived difficulty) to perform this behaviour. In the TPB, the subjectively perceived characteristics of the situation and the normative claims of the social situation are regarded as relevant factors, influencing behaviour. The inner psychological evaluation processes gain a significant influence on the actual mobility behaviour, especially in situations, that are not characterized by complete transparency of information and thus require a decision in uncertainty. Moral beliefs and habits are, however, not considered. The applicability of the TPB to the transportation system could be successfully proved in several studies.22
Sample 1

Related to Theory of Planned Behaviour

  • General Background (Brief description of the national, sector-specific or other relevant context in which the individual contractor will operate)

  • Paid Claims without Supporting Documentation Any Paid Claim for which Xxxxxxx cannot produce documentation shall be considered an error and the total reimbursement received by Xxxxxxx for such Paid Claim shall be deemed an Overpayment. Replacement sampling for Paid Claims with missing documentation is not permitted.

  • No Felony Criminal Convictions Contractor represents that neither Contractor nor any of its employees, agents, or representatives, including any subcontractors and employees, agents, or representative of such subcontractors, have been convicted of a felony criminal offense or that if such a conviction has occurred Contractor has fully advised System Agency in writing of the facts and circumstances surrounding the convictions.

  • Name and Likeness The Company shall have the right in perpetuity to use the Executive’s name, image, and likeness in connection with credits, advertising and publicity for product for which the Executive performs any development and/or production services, and during the Term otherwise in connection with the Company and its business.

  • Reporting of Abuse, Neglect, or Exploitation Consistent with provisions of 33 V.S.A. §4913(a) and §6903, Party and any of its agents or employees who, in the performance of services connected with this agreement, (a) is a caregiver or has any other contact with clients and (b) has reasonable cause to believe that a child or vulnerable adult has been abused or neglected as defined in Chapter 49 or abused, neglected, or exploited as defined in Chapter 69 of Title 33 V.S.A. shall: as to children, make a report containing the information required by 33 V.S.A. §4914 to the Commissioner of the Department for Children and Families within 24 hours; or, as to a vulnerable adult, make a report containing the information required by 33 V.S.A. §6904 to the Division of Licensing and Protection at the Department of Disabilities, Aging, and Independent Living within 48 hours. Party will ensure that its agents or employees receive training on the reporting of abuse or neglect to children and abuse, neglect or exploitation of vulnerable adults.

  • Criminal Background Check It is the Responsibility of CHESAPEAKE CENTER, INC. to make certain that its employees, agents, volunteers, and contractors, who have contact with students receiving services are fingerprinted and have a background check in compliance with Family Law Article, Annotated Code of Maryland, and Section 5-551 through 5-557. CHESAPEAKE CENTER, INC. may not hire, contract, or otherwise engage an individual to participate in this Cooperative Agreement who has been convicted of a crime involving child abuse or neglect; contributing to the delinquency of a minor; a crime of violence as set forth in Criminal Law Article §14-101, Annotated Code of Maryland; or has evidence of a criminal history which in the opinion of Chesapeake Center, Inc. makes the individual unfit to participate in this Cooperative Agreement.

  • Criminal Background Checks Provider and College reserve the right to conduct criminal background checks on Resident to determine Resident’s suitability to live in Residence Facility, and Resident consents and agrees that Provider and College has permission to conduct criminal background checks on Resident.

  • Medical Verification The Town may require medical verification of an employee’s absence if the Town perceives the employee is abusing sick leave or has used an excessive amount of sick leave. The Town may require medical verification of an employee’s absence to verify that the employee is able to return to work with or without restrictions.

  • Policy Grievance Where either Party disputes the general application, interpretation or alleged violation of an article of this Agreement, the dispute shall be discussed initially with the Employer or the Union, as the case may be, within thirty (30) days of the occurrence. Where no satisfactory agreement is reached, either Party may submit the dispute to arbitration, as set out in Article 10.

  • State of California Public Liability and Workers’ Compensation Program A. The Judicial Council has elected to be self-insured for its motor vehicle, aircraft liability and general liability exposures. B. The Judicial Council administers workers’ compensation benefits for its employees through a Third Party agreement.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!