Time-complexity Sample Clauses

Time-complexity. In the simulation, ’s overhead is dominated by com- puting (σi,j, Ri, Ai) for j = i and hj. Computing hj requires qH exponen- tiations in G (the overhead to sample a random element in G is about one 0 У 0 exponentiation). Computing σi,j requires (n2) exponentiations in G. Note that can compute Ai by an exponentiation in GT rather than a pairing computa- tion. Computing Ri, Ai requires (n) exponentiations in G and GT , respectively. Let τExp denote the time complexity to compute one exponentiation without dif- ferentiation of exponentiations in different groups. Hence, the time complexity of У is τ′ = τ + 0((qH + n2)τExp). H
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Time-complexity. Consider an algorithm that solves consensus in an asyn- chronous system equipped with an eventual failure detector such as AΩ. In every execution, a correct leader process eventually emerges, but there is no bound on the time at which a correct process is elected. Obviously, the worst- case number of reads, or writes, performed by a process is unbounded. Thus, we measure the time complexity of asynchronous consensus algorithms in solo executions. Specifically, the individual write complexity (respectively the individ- ual step complexity) is the worst-case number of write operations (respectively the total number of read aand write operation) that occur in solo executions in which only one process participates and this process is the leader output by the failure detector from the beginning of the execution.
Time-complexity. ‌ The main strength of the baseline method is its extremely cheap computation cost. The time complexity of the algorithm is O(n3r) for well-structured K, as derived in this section. To begin the derivation, we start by explicitly stating the steps in the algorithm. These can vary between implementations, but here we discuss what is currently known to be the most efficient general method for computing the TSVD approximation (3.1).
Time-complexity. ‌ In this section we show that the truncation method takes O(n3 +(l+m)n2r +k2r +k3) time to compute for image deconvolution problems. In practice, this is not better than the baseline, but it is nonetheless fast enough to be feasible for very large matrices. The steps of the truncation-based Kroncker TSVD approximation algorithm are as follows, with the first step the same as the baseline method: Σ
Time-complexity. ‌ In this section we show that the reordering method is computationally feasible, with an O(n3r + k2r + k3) running time for the image deconvolution problem. As with the basic truncation method, this is not as fast as the baseline, but is computationally feasible. This time complexity masks that care should be taken in certain steps to optimize performance for modern computer architectures; see Subsection 5.2.1 for details. Recall the steps of the reordering Kronecker-based TSVD algorithm:
Time-complexity. The time complexity of our distance estimation methods are O(nms) where n is the number of participants, m is the number of targets, and s is the number of points (sampling points when fi is continuous) in each participant’s cloaked area. Algorithm 1 runs in O(nm) for the centroid-point method because the probabilities are either 0 or 1, so the algorithm finds the answer in one pass through all participant-target pairs. For the expected-probabilistic approach, the algorithm will run no more than R rounds for all participant-target pairs, so the the time complexity is O(Rnm).
Time-complexity. Algorithm 2 runs no more than R0 rounds of passing through all targets in ⌧ , so having the number of all targets as m, the time complexity is O(R0m).
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Time-complexity

  • Workload An employee who believes that her workload is unsafe or consistently excessive shall discuss the problem with her immediate supervisor. If the problem is not resolved in this discussion, the employee may seek a remedy by means of the grievance procedure. If the matter is not resolved in the grievance procedure, it may be referred to troubleshooter who shall:

  • Scope of Work The Contractor has overall responsibility for and shall provide and furnish all materials, equipment, tools and labor as necessary or reasonably inferable to complete the Work, or any phase of the Work, in accordance with the Owner’s requirements and the terms of the Contract Documents.

  • Project/Milestones Taxpayer is a multinational defense contractor specializing in the development and manufacture of intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance and detection systems. Taxpayer has certified in its application that absent award of the CCTC, its project may occur in another state; and, it may terminate all or a portion of its employees in California or relocate all or a portion of its employees in California to another state. In consideration for the Credit, Taxpayer agrees to hire full-time employees and invest in manufacturing and computer equipment, furniture and fixtures, and tenant improvements as part of its expansion in Anaheim, California (collectively, the “Project”). Further, Taxpayer agrees to satisfy the milestones as described in Exhibit A (“Milestones”) and must maintain Milestones for a minimum of three (3) taxable years thereafter. In the event Taxpayer employs more than the number of full-time employees, determined on an annual full-time equivalent basis, than required in Exhibit A, for purposes of satisfying the “Minimum Annual Wage of California Full-time Employees Hired” and the “Cumulative Average Annual Wage of California Full-time Employees Hired,” Taxpayer may use the wages of any of the full-time employees hired within the required time period. For purposes of calculating the “Minimum Annual Wage of California Full-time Employees Hired” and the “Cumulative Average Annual Wage of California Full-time Employees Hired,” the wage of any full-time employee that is not employed by Taxpayer for the entire taxable year shall be annualized. In addition, the wage of any full-time employee hired to fill a vacated position in which a full-time employee was employed during Taxpayer’s Base Year shall be disregarded.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.