Types of Evaluation. 23.1.1 Biennial/Annual Evaluation The purpose of Biennial/Annual Evaluation is to evaluate the faculty member at his or her current rank expectation.
Types of Evaluation. Short-form and Long-form Evaluations
Types of Evaluation. Short-form and Long-form Evaluations
1. Short Form Evaluation: A certificated employee with four (4) consecutive years of satisfactory evaluation in each criteria area may request short form status for any full year. Once on short form status, the employee may continue with the short form process for three (3) consecutive years if approved by district administration. Each employee will receive a long form evaluation at least once every four (4) years. The short form of evaluation will be based upon a minimum of two (2) observations totaling not less than 60 minutes. The short form of evaluation may not be used as a basis for determining that a certificated employee’s work is unsatisfactory. An employee may be removed from short form status with written notification from District administration explaining the reason for the change in status. This notification must be made by February 1st.
Types of Evaluation. 6.2.1 There shall be two (2) types of evaluations for non-classroom teachers:
1. Summative Process
a) A minimum of two (2) observations for a total of sixty (60) minutes, one of which must be thirty (30) minutes.
b) A final annual written evaluation based on teacher evaluation criteria.
c) Focus on employees’ meeting performance standards.
2. Professional Growth Option (PGO)
a) Goal setting conference with supervisor.
b) Mid-year review with supervisor.
Types of Evaluation. Tenure decisions will be based primarily on Supervisory evaluations with input from students.
Types of Evaluation. Process • What resources or inputs are needed to meet program requirements? • What activities are being conducted? • How well are activities being conducted? • Do activities comply with program requirements? • Have grantees accomplished their stated objectives? • What outputs have been produced from the activities?
Types of Evaluation. 10.2.1 A probationary regular or term employee shall be evaluated by the appropriate Director/delegate in an all-inclusive way at least once a year. An employee who has held regular employee status for at least two (2) years shall be evaluated in an all-inclusive way once every three (3) years. An auxiliary employee shall be evaluated in an all-inclusive way as opportunity allows and as determined by the appropriate Director/ delegate. In the absence of an all-inclusive evaluation in a given year, the employee's performance shall be assumed to be satisfactory. Student questionnaires will be administered by the College once each duty year, be retained by the appropriate Director, and the results of the three (3) years' data be included in the all-inclusive evaluation.
10.2.2 An employee may also be evaluated in the classroom or like area of primary responsibility (formal evaluation). Such evaluation will be conducted by the appropriate Vice President/delegate at the discretion of the appropriate Vice President/delegate, or upon the request of an employee.
Types of Evaluation. In the evaluation of a program there are essentially two types of evaluation to be distinguished: process evaluation and product evaluation. Process evaluation is considered to be the evaluation of the functioning of a program. Questions to be answered might be “‘which activities are deployed within the program’, ‘what type of clients participate in the program’, ‘which clients leave the program before completion’ and ‘which segments of the program require improvement’” (21, p377). Several types of process evaluation have been established, one of them being evaluation of implementation, to establish whether or not a program has been implemented as planned. Another type of process evaluation is the so-called formative evaluation, through which strengths and weaknesses of the program are identified. This is commonly done by asking clients and staff of the program about the quality of aspects of the program (21). Product evaluation addresses the results of a program by establishing meaningful change in clients. Product evaluation can be related to certain norms or standards that are supposed to be reached, or it can be aimed at the establishment of the presence of change, either in a prospective or retrospective design. In a prospective design at least two measurements are taken: one before the start of the program and one after completion of the program. In a retrospective design there are only post- program measurements taken. The most commonly known and used type of product evaluation is effect evaluation, which is deployed to establish not only the presence of change but also the presence of a causal relationship between the program and the observed change (21). As such this type of evaluation requires the use of a control group. Usually, control groups are constructed in one of three ways: post hoc, at the beginning of a program through a matching process or through randomized assignment (true experiment). Typically, random assignment is viewed as the best approach (17; 43). To determine the success of a program obviously product evaluation and especially effect-evaluation is important. Unless it can be established that a program results in positive change in clients ánd that this change can be ascribed foremost to the program under evaluation, the success of a program remains uncertain. For this purpose the ideal choice is that of a Randomized Controlled Trial with a baseline and post-intervention measurement. However, process evaluation is important to...
Types of Evaluation. Short-form and Long-form Evaluations
1. Short Form Evaluation: A certificated employee with four (4) consecutive years of satisfactory evaluation in each criteria area may request short form status for any full year. Once on short form status, the employee may continue with the short form process for three (3) consecutive years if approved by district administration. Each employee will receive a long form evaluation at least once every four (4) years. The short form of evaluation will be based upon a minimum of two
Types of Evaluation a. Annual Evaluation
1. Tenured Faculty: All tenured members of the Bargaining Unit will participate in an annual evaluation. This evaluation will be formative, with plans implemented to develop and intensify the skills of the faculty member. The annual evaluation of faculty members forms a part of all other forms of evaluation like Post-Tenure review.
2. Tenure-track Faculty: All tenure-track members of the Bargaining Unit will participate in an annual evaluation. This evaluation will be formative, with plans implemented to develop and intensify the skills of the faculty member. The annual evaluation of faculty members forms a part of all other forms of evaluation like Tenure review.
