UAV and Drone Challenges Sample Clauses

UAV and Drone Challenges. The term UAV (unmanned Aerial Vehicles) refers to any flying aircraft without humans on board. In recent years, the usage of UAVs in different application fields has increased sig- nificantly. Currently, most important markets for UAVs are aerial photogrammetry, panoramic (a) (b) (c) Figure 3: Different obstacles in typical environments of UAVs photography, precision farming, surveillance and reconnaissance. Further application fields are rescue, law enforcement, logistics, research, etc. The usage of such systems in the entertainment domain is growing especially fast. This development is boosted by the con- stantly rising commercial market for small UAVs providing broad accessibility, diversity and low costs. Essential enhancements to UAV usage are expected from improvement of their capabilities; perception and intelligent evaluation of the environment make many new appli- cations possible. In most cases, UAVs are carrying sensor payload that allows to accomplish the respective task. Even though we are used to hear about autonomous drones, most of the current systems are still remotely piloted by humans. A human on the ground has to permanently monitor both the payload of the drone in order to successfully accomplish the desired mis- sion (e.g., to capture the desired data) and the drone flight in order to avoid collisions with obstacles. The simultaneous operation of the UAV and of the sensor payload is a quite challenging task. Mistakes may be fatal either with regard to the mission success or — much worse — with regard to the mission safety. Besides, there might be a limitation of the UAV operation area due to the need for a constantly available communication link between the UAV and the remote control station. Most of the small UAVs fly with velocities up to 60 km/h (17 m/s), but some of them can fly with velocities up to 180 km/h (50 m/s) and even more. The stopping distance is strongly dependent on the velocity, the type of the UAV and the payload. With the regular velocity of about 30 km/h of a common type of “multicopter”, the stopping distance is less than 5 m, but with more extreme UAVs it can be up to 50 m. The size of a dangerous obstacle is usually over 5 cm (Figure 3a), but in some cases obstacles with sizes of as less 2 mm, more difficult to detect, can also be dangerous (Figure 3b and 3c). As always, each technology comes along with drawbacks and potential for unintended abuse and this is in particular true for UAVs. With the growing numbe...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to UAV and Drone Challenges

  • Challenges The Experts may be challenged by either Party if circumstances exist that give rise to justifiable doubts as to any of their impartiality or independence. In such circumstances the challenge shall be brought by written notice to the ICC copied to the other Party within fourteen (14) calendar days of the appointment of the relevant Expert or within fourteen (14) calendar days of the challenging Party becoming aware of the circumstances giving rise to the challenge. Unless the challenged Expert withdraws. or whichever of the Parties that has not brought the challenge agrees to the challenge, within fourteen (14) calendar days of the challenge, the ICC shall decide the challenge and, if appropriate, shall appoint a replacement Expert in accordance with the criteria set out herein.

  • No Challenges In no event shall any Secured Party take any action to challenge, contest or dispute the validity, extent, enforceability, or priority of the Collateral Agent’s Liens hereunder or under any other Security Document with respect to any of the Collateral, or that would have the effect of invalidating any such Lien or support any Person who takes any such action. Each of the Secured Parties agrees that it will not take any action to challenge, contest or dispute the validity, enforceability or secured status of any other Secured Party’s claims against any Obligor (other than any such claim resulting from a breach of this Agreement by a Secured Party, or any challenge, contest or dispute alleging arithmetical error in the determination of a claim), or that would have the effect of invalidating any such claim, or support any Person who takes any such action.

  • Legal Proceedings; Governmental Orders (a) There are no Actions pending or, to Seller’s Knowledge, threatened (a) against or by the Company affecting any of its properties or assets (or by or against Seller or any Affiliate thereof and relating to the Company); or (b) against or by the Company, Seller or any Affiliate of Seller that challenges or seeks to prevent, enjoin or otherwise delay the transactions contemplated by this Agreement. No event has occurred or circumstances exist that may give rise to, or serve as a basis for, any such Action. (b) There are no outstanding Governmental Orders and no unsatisfied judgments, penalties or awards against or affecting the Company or any of its properties or assets.

  • No Governmental Action No investigation, action or proceeding shall have been commenced by the Department of Justice or Federal Trade Commission or any other governmental entity challenging or seeking to enjoin the consummation of this transaction and neither Buyer nor Seller shall have been notified of a present intention by the Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice, the Director of the Bureau of Competition of the Federal Trade Commission or any governmental entity (or their respective agents or designees) to commence, or recommend the commencement of, such an investigation, action or proceeding.

  • Infringement Proceedings Each Party agrees to promptly notify the other Party of any unauthorized use of the other Party's Marks of which it has actual knowledge. Each Party will have the sole right and discretion to bring proceedings alleging infringement of its Marks or unfair competition related thereto; provided, however, that each Party agrees to provide the other Party with its reasonable cooperation and assistance with respect to any such infringement proceedings.

  • No Governmental Litigation There shall not be pending or threatened any Legal Proceeding in which a Governmental Body is or is threatened to become a party or is otherwise involved: (a) challenging or seeking to restrain or prohibit the consummation of the Merger or any of the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement; (b) relating to the Merger and seeking to obtain from Parent or any of its subsidiaries any damages that may be material to Parent; (c) seeking to prohibit or limit in any material respect Parent's ability to vote, receive dividends with respect to or otherwise exercise ownership rights with respect to the stock of the Surviving Corporation; or (d) which would materially and adversely affect the right of Parent, the Surviving Corporation or any subsidiary of Parent to own the assets or operate the business of the Company.

  • No Pending Governmental Actions No proceeding initiated by any Governmental Entity seeking an Injunction shall be pending.

  • No Governmental Order No Governmental Authority shall have enacted, issued, promulgated, enforced or entered any Governmental Order which is in effect and has the effect of making the Merger or any of the other material transactions contemplated by this Agreement illegal or otherwise restraining or prohibiting the consummation of the Merger or any of the other transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

  • No Proceedings or Litigation No action, suit or proceeding before any arbitrator or any governmental authority shall have been commenced, and no investigation by any governmental authority shall have been threatened, against the Company or any Subsidiary, or any of the officers, directors or affiliates of the Company or any Subsidiary seeking to restrain, prevent or change the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, or seeking damages in connection with such transactions.

  • Infringement Actions Following an Option Exercise Date, subject to the provisions of any Voyager In-License, Genzyme shall have the sole and exclusive right, but not the obligation, to take any reasonable measures it deems appropriate with respect to any Competitive Infringement in the Genzyme Territory of any Genzyme Technology, Genzyme Collaboration Technology, Joint Collaboration Technology or Voyager Product-Specific Patent Rights, or with Voyager’s prior written consent, the Voyager Platform Patent Rights. Such measures may include (a) initiating or prosecuting an infringement, misappropriation or other appropriate suit or action (each an CERTAIN CONFIDENTIAL PORTIONS OF THIS EXHIBIT WERE OMITTED AND REPLACED WITH “[***]”. A COMPLETE VERSION OF THIS EXHIBIT HAS BEEN FILED SEPARATELY WITH THE SECRETARY OF THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION PURSUANT TO AN APPLICATION REQUESTING CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT UNDER RULE 406 PROMULGATED UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED. “Infringement Action”) in the Genzyme Territory, or (b) subject to Section 11.1.5 (Genzyme Sublicense Rights), granting adequate rights and licenses to any Third Party necessary to render continued Competitive Infringement in the Genzyme Territory non-infringing. Voyager will consider in good faith any request from Genzyme to initiate an Infringement Action in the Genzyme Territory against any Third Party with respect to such Competitive Infringement of any Voyager Platform Patent Right; provided, however, that Voyager shall not be required to initiate any such Infringement Action or permit Genzyme to initiate any such Infringement Action with respect to any Voyager Platform Patent Right. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if Genzyme does not inform Voyager that it intends to either initiate such an Infringement Action or grant adequate rights and licenses to such Third Party within [***] after Genzyme’s receipt of a notice of infringement pursuant to Section 15.4.1 (Notice of Infringement), then Voyager will have the second right, but not the obligation, to initiate such Infringement Action, but solely with respect to any Voyager Technology, Voyager Collaboration Technology, or Joint Collaboration Technology.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!