Un-traceability Sample Clauses

Un-traceability. We employ random integers a1 and a2 along with fresh timestamps in different sessions which enable the constructed messages (R1, R2, R3, R4) in a session to be unique each time these are generated [26,27]. The attacker may not be able to distinguish the exchanged messages among for MUi and CMDi across various sessions. Furthermore, the legal identifies such as IDu or PIDu are used in collision-resistant one hash function which enables the protocol in affording the untraceability feature.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Un-traceability. Un-traceability means that the passive adversary cannot monitor the communication channel to trace a vehicle by analyzing message sender. In the three- party authentication phase, the timestamp contained in the pseudo identity PIDi = RIDi ⊕ h2(riPpub, Ti) keeps changing, so that different messages sent from the same vehicle are identified by different pseudo identities. As for the public keys Ki that are used for participating the key agreement process, they are generated by a random way and only sent to TA once, which means that it is hard for the adversary to trace a vehicle by analyzing Ki. In the key agreement phase, the broadcast message sent from TA do not contain any identity information of the vehicle. So un-traceability is achieved in our proposed protocol.

Related to Un-traceability

  • Traceability 11.1 Under the terms of this Agreement, Supplier shall have and operate a process to ensure that all Products, sub-assemblies and the components contained therein supplied to the Buyer are completely Traceable back to manufacturer by batch or lot or date code. 11.2 Further Supplier hereby agrees, unless directed otherwise by the Buyer, to procure components through franchised distributors or direct component Suppliers. Supplier agrees to indemnify and hold the Buyer harmless from and against all costs and expenses for the removal, repair or replacement and reinstallation of counterfeit components incorporated into a Product sold by Supplier to the Buyer where the counterfeit component was procured by Supplier from a person or entity other than a franchised distributor or direct component Supplier or other person or entity pre-approved by the Buyer in writing.

  • Compatibility 1. Any unresolved issue arising from a mutual agreement procedure case otherwise within the scope of the arbitration process provided for in this Article and Articles 25A to 25G shall not be submitted to arbitration if the issue falls within the scope of a case with respect to which an arbitration panel or similar body has previously been set up in accordance with a bilateral or multilateral convention that provides for mandatory binding arbitration of unresolved issues arising from a mutual agreement procedure case. 2. Nothing in this Article and Articles 25A to 25G shall affect the fulfilment of wider obligations with respect to the arbitration of unresolved issues arising in the context of a mutual agreement procedure resulting from other conventions to which the Contracting States are or will become parties.”.

  • Review of legality and data minimisation (a) The data importer agrees to review the legality of the request for disclosure, in particular whether it remains within the powers granted to the requesting public authority, and to challenge the request if, after careful assessment, it concludes that there are reasonable grounds to consider that the request is unlawful under the laws of the country of destination, applicable obligations under international law and principles of international comity. The data importer shall, under the same conditions, pursue possibilities of appeal. When challenging a request, the data importer shall seek interim measures with a view to suspending the effects of the request until the competent judicial authority has decided on its merits. It shall not disclose the personal data requested until required to do so under the applicable procedural rules. These requirements are without prejudice to the obligations of the data importer under Clause 14(e). (b) The data importer agrees to document its legal assessment and any challenge to the request for disclosure and, to the extent permissible under the laws of the country of destination, make the documentation available to the data exporter. It shall also make it available to the competent supervisory authority on request.

  • Labelling The distributor, on behalf of the selected vendor agrees that all supplies of articles should invariably contain the following information on its label and the carton. One information should not be overlapped by any other information needed to be furnished. The label should contain : a. Name of the item as approved b. CMS Cat. No. c. Manufacturing date/Import date for the imported items. d. Expiry Date. (where applicable) e. Name & address of Registered Office of Manufacturers and place of manufacture. f. Manufacturing License Number. (where applicable for Manufactures) g. Batch Number (where applicable) h. Month and Year of supply. i. The label & Carton must invariably marked “W B. GOVT SUPPLY : NOT FOR SALE”. j. All Surgical items quoted/supplied by the tenderer must conform to IS /BIS /CE/USFDA. Pacemker must conform to CE & US FDA norms. In case of Drugs items quoted /supplied by tenderer MUST CONFORM TO IP, BP, or USP norms and N.F.I. –III specification as noted against the item(s) in catalogue as applicable. k. The MRP and Trade Name will not be allowed to be printed in any pack. This will lead to cancellation of candidature straightaway. However, for excisable products, insertion of writing of Govt MRP is allowed as per provision laid down in the order of the Central Excise dept. However, for imported item(s), MRP and Trade name may be allowed in addition to Generic name.

  • Interoperability To the extent required by applicable law, Cisco shall provide You with the interface information needed to achieve interoperability between the Software and another independently created program. Cisco will provide this interface information at Your written request after you pay Cisco’s licensing fees (if any). You will keep this information in strict confidence and strictly follow any applicable terms and conditions upon which Cisco makes such information available.

  • Accessibility Supplier warrants that all Products will meet the requirements set forth in all federal, state, local and foreign laws, rules, and regulations applicable to accessibility of information technology for people with disabilities. Supplier agrees to use personnel trained and knowledgeable in supporting the needs of persons with disabilities in performance of Services under this Order.

  • Year 2000 Compatibility Take all action necessary to assure that its computer based systems are able to operate and effectively process data including dates on and after January 1, 2000, and, at the reasonable request of the Administrative Agent or the Required Lenders, provide evidence to the Lenders of such year 2000 compatibility.

  • Validation To validate the notice requirements outlined in Section 5.3, the Assuming Institution shall provide the Receiver (i) an Affidavit of Publication to meet the publication requirements outlined in Section 5.3(a) and (ii) the Assuming Institution will prepare an Affidavit of Mailing in a form substantially similar to Exhibit 2.3B after mailing the seven (7) day Notice to Depositors as required under Section 5.3(b).

  • Polygraph Tests The Employer agrees that polygraph or similar lie detector tests will not be used.

  • Hardware and Software Requirements In order to access and retain Disclosures electronically, you must satisfy the following computer hardware and software requirements: access to the Internet; an email account and related software capable of receiving email through the Internet; a web browser which is SSL-compliant and supports secure sessions, and hardware capable of running this software.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!