Unit Probationary Faculty Reappointment Policy. 7.2.2.1. Each academic unit (department/school or instructional support unit) shall have established written policies for reappointment of probationary faculty members regarding: (a) the criteria and standards used for annual performance reviews (APRs) and enhanced performance reviews (EPRs), (b) the process for conducting and completing either of these types of reviews, (c) the schedule or deadlines for completing reviews and, (d) a process outlining the opportunity for BUFMs to submit a rebuttal letter within three business days after a recommendation is forwarded to the Xxxx and/or after a recommendation is forwarded to the Xxxxxxx. 7.2.2.2. The responsibility for establishing criteria, standards, and procedures for evaluation and for conducting the annual reviews of probationary tenure-track faculty members lies with the tenured and tenure-track BUFMs of the academic unit and the Chair/Director, subject to the endorsement of the Xxxx and Xxxxxxx. 7.2.2.3. At the initiation of the University or unit faculty, the unit faculty may amend the unit’s reappointment policy at any time, with the concurrence of the Chair/Director, Xxxx, and Xxxxxxx. However, such changes may not be applied retroactively to probationary tenure-track faculty during their probationary period unless requested in writing by the faculty member prior to the initiation of the review process. The Xxxx and Xxxxxxx (or their designees) shall work collaboratively with the unit faculty and the Chair/Director during the policy revision process.
Appears in 4 contracts
Samples: Collective Bargaining Agreement, Collective Bargaining Agreement, Collective Bargaining Agreement
Unit Probationary Faculty Reappointment Policy. 7.2.2.16.2.2.1. Each academic unit (department/school or instructional support unit) shall have established written policies for reappointment of probationary faculty members regarding: (a) the criteria and standards used for annual performance reviews (APRs) and enhanced performance reviews (EPRs), (b) the process for conducting and completing either of these types of reviews, (c) the schedule or deadlines for completing reviews and, (d) a process outlining the opportunity for BUFMs to submit a rebuttal letter within three business days after a recommendation is forwarded to the Xxxx and/or after a recommendation is forwarded to the Xxxxxxx.
7.2.2.26.2.2.2. The responsibility for establishing criteria, standards, and procedures for evaluation and for conducting the annual reviews of probationary tenure-track faculty members lies with the tenured and tenure-track BUFMs of the academic unit and the Chair/Director, subject to the endorsement of the Xxxx and Xxxxxxx.
7.2.2.36.2.2.3. At the initiation of the University or unit faculty, the unit faculty may amend the unit’s reappointment policy at any time, with the concurrence of the Chair/Director, Xxxx, and Xxxxxxx. However, such changes may not be applied retroactively to probationary tenure-track faculty during their probationary period unless requested in writing by the faculty member prior to the initiation of the review process. The Xxxx and Xxxxxxx (or their designees) shall work collaboratively with the unit faculty and the Chair/Director during the policy revision process.
Appears in 3 contracts
Samples: Collective Bargaining Agreement, Collective Bargaining Agreement, Collective Bargaining Agreement