U.S. DOT Four Questions and Mapping to 12 Analyses Sample Clauses

U.S. DOT Four Questions and Mapping to 12 Analyses. Table 3-1 shows the four “Objective Questions” that U.S. DOT has directed the national evaluation team to address.9 The analyses present what must be studied to answer the four objective questions. Table 3-2 identifies the 12 evaluation analyses described in the National Evaluation Framework and shows how they related to the four objective questions. These analyses from the NEF form the basis of the evaluation plans at the UPA/CRD sites, including Seattle/LWC. Table 3-1. U.S. DOT National Evaluation “Objective Questions” Objective Question #1 How much was congestion reduced in the area impacted by the implementation of the tolling, transit, technology, and telecommuting strategies? It is anticipated that congestion reduction could be measured by one of the following measures, and will vary by site and implementation strategy: • reductions in vehicle trips made during peak/congested periods; • reductions in travel times during peak/congested periods; • reductions in congestion delay during peak/congested periods; and • reductions in the duration of congested periods. Objective Question #2 What are the associated impacts of implementing the congestion reduction strategies? It is anticipated that impacts will vary by site and that the following measures may be used: • increases in facility throughput during peak/congested periods; • increases in transit ridership during peak/congested periods; • modal shifts to transit and carpools/vanpools; • traveler behavior change (e.g., shifts in time of travel, mode, route, destination, or forgoing trips); • operational impacts on parallel systems/routes; • equity impacts; • environmental impacts; • impacts on goods movement; and • effects on businesses. Objective Question #3 What are the non-technical success factors with respect to the impacts of outreach, political and community support, and institutional arrangements implemented to manage and guide the implementation? Objective Question #4 What are the overall costs and benefits of the deployed set of strategies? 9 “Urban Partnership Agreement Demonstration Evaluation – Statement of Work,” United States Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration; November 29, 2007. Table 3-2. U.S. DOT Objective Questions vs. Evaluation Analyses U.S. DOT 4 Objective Questions Evaluation Analyses #1 – How much was congestion reduced? #1 – Congestion #2 – What are the associated impacts of the congestion reduction strategies? Strategy Performance #2 – Strategy Perform...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
U.S. DOT Four Questions and Mapping to 12 Analyses. Table 3-1 shows the four “Objective Questions” that U.S. DOT has directed the national evaluation team to address.6 The analyses present what must be studied to answer the four objective questions. Table 3-2 identifies the 12 evaluation analyses described in the National Evaluation Framework and shows how they relate to the four objective questions. These 12 analyses form the basis of the evaluation plans at the UPA/CRD sites, including San Francisco.
Sample 1

Related to U.S. DOT Four Questions and Mapping to 12 Analyses

  • Xxxxxxx to Meet Timelines Failure by the Union to comply with the timelines will result in the automatic withdrawal of the grievance. Failure by the Employer to comply with the timelines will entitle the Union to move the grievance to the next step of the procedure.

  • Use of artificial intelligence or data analytics You acknowledge that we may use artificial intelligence or data analytics (i.e. technologies that assist or replace human decision-making) whilst providing products and services to you, for purposes including but not limited to risk assessment, statistical, trend analysis and planning; and to make decisions, provide, operate, process and administer your accounts and services with us.

  • GEOGRAPHIC AREA AND SECTOR SPECIFIC ALLOWANCES, CONDITIONS AND EXCEPTIONS The following allowances and conditions shall apply where relevant: Where the company does work which falls under the following headings, the company agrees to pay and observe the relevant respective conditions and/or exceptions set out below in each case.

  • Description of Funding Techniques 6.2.1 The following are terms under which standard funding techniques shall be implemented for all transfers of funds to which the funding technique is applied in section 6.3.2 of this Agreement. Funding Technique Name Description Actual Clearance, ZBA - ACH The State shall request funds such that they are deposited by ACH in a State account on the settlement date of payments issued by the State. The request shall be made in accordance with the appropriate Federal agency cut-off time specified in Exhibit I. The amount of the request shall be for the amount of funds that clear the State's account on the settlement date. This funding technique is interest neutral. Actual Clearance, ZBA - Same Day Payment The State shall request funds the same day it pays out funds, in accordance with the appropriate Federal agency cut-off time specified in Exhibit I. A Federal agency will deposit funds in a State account the same day as requested. The amount of the request shall be for the amount of funds that clear the State's account that day. This funding technique is interest neutral. Average Clearance The State shall request funds such that they are deposited by ACH on the dollar- weighted average day of clearance for the disbursement, in accordance with the clearance pattern specified in Exhibit II. The request shall be made in accordance with the appropriate Federal agency cut-off time specified in Exhibit I. The amount of the request shall be for the exact amount of that disbursement. This funding technique is interest neutral.

  • Terms of Reference of the Investigator (a) The purpose of the investigator will be to ascertain facts.

  • Return of Materials Pertaining to Work Product Upon the request of Customer, but in any event upon termination or expiration of this Contract or a Statement of Work, Vendor shall surrender to Customer all documents and things pertaining to the Work Product, including but not limited to drafts, memoranda, notes, records, drawings, manuals, computer software, reports, data, and all other documents or materials (and copies of same) generated or developed by Vendor or furnished by Customer to Vendor, including all materials embodying the Work Product, any Customer confidential information, or Intellectual Property Rights in such Work Product, regardless of whether complete or incomplete. This section is intended to apply to all Work Product as well as to all documents and things furnished to Vendor by Customer or by anyone else that pertain to the Work Product.

  • Technology Research Analyst Job# 1810 General Characteristics Maintains a strong understanding of the enterprise’s IT systems and architectures. Assists in the analysis of the requirements for the enterprise and applying emerging technologies to support long-term business objectives. Responsible for researching, collecting, and disseminating information on emerging technologies and key learnings throughout the enterprise. Researches and recommends changes to foundation architecture. Supports research projects to identify and evaluate emerging technologies. Interfaces with users and staff to evaluate possible implementation of the new technology in the enterprise, consistent with the goal of improving existing systems and technologies and in meeting the needs of the business. Analyzes and researches process of deployment and assists in this process.

  • DEVELOPMENT OR ASSISTANCE IN DEVELOPMENT OF SPECIFICATIONS REQUIREMENTS/ STATEMENTS OF WORK Firms and/or individuals that assisted in the development or drafting of the specifications, requirements, statements of work, or solicitation documents contained herein are excluded from competing for this solicitation. This shall not be applicable to firms and/or individuals providing responses to a publicly posted Request for Information (RFI) associated with a solicitation.

  • Research Use Reporting To assure adherence to NIH GDS Policy, the PI agrees to provide annual Progress Updates as part of the annual Project Renewal or Project Close-out processes, prior to the expiration of the one (1) year data access period. The PI who is seeking Renewal or Close-out of a project agree to complete the appropriate online forms and provide specific information such as how the data have been used, including publications or presentations that resulted from the use of the requested dataset(s), a summary of any plans for future research use (if the PI is seeking renewal), any violations of the terms of access described within this Agreement and the implemented remediation, and information on any downstream intellectual property generated from the data. The PI also may include general comments regarding suggestions for improving the data access process in general. Information provided in the progress updates helps NIH evaluate program activities and may be considered by the NIH GDS governance committees as part of NIH’s effort to provide ongoing stewardship of data sharing activities subject to the NIH GDS Policy.

  • Certification of Meeting or Exceeding Tobacco-Free Workplace Policy Minimum Standards A. Grantee certifies that it has adopted and enforces a Tobacco-Free Workplace Policy that meets or exceeds all of the following minimum standards of:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.