Examples of Ownership Restriction in a sentence
Any purported delivery hereunder shall be void and have no effect to the extent (but only to the extent) that, after such delivery, (A) the Share Amount would exceed the Post-Effective Limit, (B) the Dealer Group would directly or indirectly so beneficially own in excess of the Threshold Number of Shares or (C) such delivery would result in a violation of the Counterparty Stock Ownership Restriction.
Any purported delivery hereunder shall be void and have no effect to the extent (but only to the extent) that, after such delivery, (i) the Share Amount would exceed the Post-Effective Limit, (ii) the Dealer Group would directly or indirectly so beneficially own in excess of the Threshold Number of Shares, (iii) Dealer would directly or indirectly so beneficially own in excess of the Exchange Limit or (iv) such delivery would result in a violation of the Counterparty Stock Ownership Restriction.
Ownership Restriction Event means the occurrence after the Trade Date of any event or existence of any condition that has the effect of it being illegal, impossible or impracticable for, or has the effect of prohibiting, restricting or materially delaying the ability of, any Reference Investor to purchase, hold, receive, sell, freely transfer or remain the owner of any Reference Asset or any amount received in respect thereof.
Any purported delivery hereunder shall be void and have no effect to the extent (but only to the extent) that, after such delivery, (A) the Share Amount would exceed the Post-Effective Limit, (B) the Dealer Group would directly or indirectly so beneficially own in excess of the Threshold Number of Shares, (C) such delivery would result in a violation of the Counterparty Stock Ownership Restriction or (D) Dealer would directly or indirectly hold in excess of the Exchange Limit.
A Limited Partner may not sell, transfer, assign or devise, or subject to security interest, lien or charge, all or any part of its Units, except as permitted in the Ownership Restriction Agreement, and any act in violation of this Section 10.3 shall be null and void ab initio.
Any assignment of any Partnership Interests in the Partnership must be in compliance with any requirements imposed by any state securities administrator having jurisdiction over the assignment and the United States Securities and Exchange Commission and must not cause the Partnership or any Subsidiary to be in violation of any Ownership Restriction.
Any purported delivery hereunder shall be void and have no effect to the extent (but only to the extent) that, after such delivery, (i) the Share Amount would exceed the Post-Effective Limit, (ii) the Dealer Group would directly or indirectly so beneficially own in excess of the Threshold Number of Shares or (iii) such delivery would result in a violation of the Counterparty Stock Ownership Restriction.
A transferee or assignee of a Limited Partner's Units transferred or assigned in compliance with the Ownership Restriction Agreement shall be admitted as a substituted Limited Partner of the Partnership (with regard to the interest so transferred and assigned) without any further approval by the Partners.
In the event that the PRC regulatory environment changes and all of the Qualification Requirement, the Foreign Ownership Restriction and the Foreign Control Restriction are removed (and assuming there are no other changes in the relevant PRC laws and regulations), Tibet Kepei will exercise the Equity Call Option in full to unwind the Structured Contracts so that the Company will be able to directly operate the schools without using the Structured Contracts.
Dealer represents and warrants that, as of the Trade Date, if Dealer received the maximum number of Shares hereunder assuming both (i) Physical Settlement applies and (ii) no restrictions on the delivery of Shares hereunder were applicable, then the Counterparty Stock Ownership Restriction would not apply so as to limit the number of Shares that Dealer could receive hereunder.