Examples of ReMAT Tariff in a sentence
In this section, we discuss the other two issues SES’ PFM raised related to IOU notification requirements and the $/kW security for ReMAT projects.3.6.1. Notification of Proposed ReMAT Tariff and PPA ModificationsThe April 2021 Rulings sought party feedback related to the IOUs’ practices of noticing the service list(s) of RPS proceedings when changes to their ReMAT PPAs and/or tariffs are proposed.
Per Section F.3. of SDG&E’s Schedule Re-MAT Tariff, the Re-MAT program will end for all Product Types 24 months after the first Product 26 D.15-01-051, p.
SCE rejected those Projects for the same reasons as it rejected the first Project application.10On August 8, 2017, Complainant filed the Complaint alleging two causes of action against SCE: (1) SCE’s rejection of the PPRs contravenes the language of the ReMAT Tariff, the PPA, and Commission ReMAT orders; and (2) SCE’s rejection of the PPRs violates Cal.
This Section also streamlines the contracting process by assigning SDG&E the responsibility of using the information contained in the PPR to complete the Re-MAT PPA, which will then be sent to the Applicant for execution.E. Right to Deny Service under Re-MAT The Denial of Re-MAT Service Section has been added to further clarify that SDG&E has the authority to deny service under the Re-MAT Tariff Schedule by written notice, under the outlined conditions.
The ReMAT program will continue to offer PPAs to qualified developers every other month until its program ends pursuant to the provisions in SDG&E’s Re-MAT Tariff.
Accordingly, effective July 19, 2019, the Commission approved AL 3356-E and 3356-E-A, extending SDG&E’s BioRAM contract by 5 years.SDG&E’s Schedule Re-MAT Tariff closed, effective June 30, 2016.
BAC and Placer County Air Pollution Control District (“Placer County”) mistakenly suggest that this language reflects a change from ReMAT and D.14-12- 081.11/ In fact, the ReMAT Tariff contains the same language regarding ownership interest, and 8/ BAC Comments at pp.
SCE ReMAT Tariff, sheet 3, prohibiting “daisy chaining.” (“The Applicant must provide to SCE an attestation that the Project is the only exporting project being developed or owned or controlled by the Applicant on any single or contiguous pieces of property.
As SCE noted in its Answer, the ReMAT decisions, tariff, and PPA do not mention storage even once, and there is nothing in the ReMAT Tariff or PPA that would allow SCE to dispatch or manage the storage feature of a ReMAT project.
SCE argues that the ReMAT Tariff states that solar PV projects fall within the As-Available Peaking product type and, in addition, Commission precedent and the ReMAT Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) support this interpretation of the ReMAT Tariff.