Examples of Substandard Work in a sentence
The Buyer may, at its sole discretion, withhold payment due for, but not limited to, the following reasons: • Substandard Work or delays in the Work not corrected promptly.
The BUYER may, at its sole discretion, withhold payment due for, but not limited to, the following reasons:• Substandard Work or delays in the Work not corrected promptly.• Evidence that a claim has been or will be filed against the Subcontractor.• Failure to promptly and properly pay lower tier Subcontractors or suppliers.
The Buyer may, at its sole discretion, withhold payment due for, but not limited to, the following reasons: Substandard Work or delays in the Work not corrected promptly. Evidence that a claim has been or will be filed against the Subcontractor. Failure to promptly and properly pay lower tier Subcontractors or suppliers.
The BUYER may, at its sole discretion, withhold payment due for, but not limited to, the following reasons: Substandard Work or delays in the Work not corrected promptly. Evidence that a claim has been or will be filed against the Subcontractor. Failure to promptly and properly pay lower tier Subcontractors or suppliers.
Courses may be repeated only under the following circumstances: Substandard Work for Non-Repeatable Courses: A student has up to three enrollments in the same course (SCC and SAC combined) to receive a satisfactory grade.
The Buyer may, at its sole discretion, withhold payment due for, but not limited to, the following reasons:• Substandard Work or delays in the Work not corrected promptly.• Evidence that a claim has been or will be filed against the Subcontractor.
The BUYER may, at its sole discretion, withhold payment due for, but not limited to, the following reasons: • Substandard Work or delays in the Work not corrected promptly.
Substandard Work, as determined solely by the Buyer, shall be redone at the expense of the Vendor.
Procedure for Reporting Careless, Hazardous, or Substandard Work Practices If an employee is aware of careless or negligent conduct, he/she must report it to a Supervisor or Department Head.
Thus, the court indicated that although Petitioner may have “threatened” harm, it was not likely that the harm would be realized, i.e., the harm threatened was minimal.