Facts. By letter dated 17 March 2006, North European Aviation Resources AS (hereinafter referred to as „NEAR” or „the complainant”) filed a complaint against the granting of aid, through the Revised National Budget, to the Norwegian Aviation College (hereinafter referred to as „NAC”). The letter was received and registered by the Authority on 20 March 2006 (Event No 366921). By letter dated 11 April 2006 (Event No 369763), the Authority informed the Norwegian authorities of the complaint and invited them to comment upon the same. By letter dated 19 May 2006 from the Norwegian Mission to the European Union, forwarding a letter from the Ministry of Government Administration & Reform, together with a letter from the Ministry of Education & Research, both dated 12 May 2006, received and registered by the Authority on 19 May 2006 (Event No 374604), the Norwegian authorities replied to the Authority's invitation to comment. By letter dated 25 August 2006, NEAR filed an extension to their complaint by which it drew the Authority's attention to various monies granted to NAC by Troms County and the Municipality of Målselv. The letter was received and registered by the Authority on 28 August 2006 (Event No 385471). By letter dated 7 September 2006 (Event No 385794), the Authority informed the Norwegian authorities of the extension to the complaint and invited them to comment upon the same and to provide any informa- tion concerning the relationship, if any, between this alleged aid and the subject matter of the original comp- laint. By letters dated 12 and 16 October 2006 from the Norwegian Mission to the European Union, forwarding letters dated 10 and 11 October 2006 from the Ministry of Government Administration & Reform, together with, respectively, a letter from Troms County dated 28 September 2006, and a letter from the Municipality of Målselv, dated 9 October 2006, received and registered by the Authority on 13 and 18 October 2006 (Event Nos 393257 and 394170), the Norwegian authorities replied to the Authority's invitation to comment.
Facts. 1 Procedure By letter dated 16 October 2003, the Authority received a complaint in which it was alleged that several county municipal schools, which provide specialised educational services in competition with the complai- nant, receive State aid through the application of input tax compensation provided for in Article 3 of the Value Added Tax Compensation Act (4). According to the complainant, municipal schools that provide certain educational services falling outside the VAT system in competition with other undertakings, receive a compensation for the input VAT paid on goods and services purchased in relation to the services they provide on commercial basis, to which private competitors are not entitled. The letter was received and registered by the Authority on 20 October 2003 (Doc. No. 03-7325 A).
Facts