Introduction. Should the granting of financial support by the RCN to the projects concerning the development of the software programme Turborouter not be covered by the aid scheme Industrial R&D Prog- rammes, as assessed above, these measures will constitute individual aid and should have been noti- fied in accordance with Article 1(3) in Part I of Protocol 3 and will have to be assessed individually.
Introduction. 1.1 A jelen Általános Szerződési Feltételek („ÁSZF”) célja az, hogy szabályozza a 3M Hungária Kft. (székhely: 1117 Budapest, Xxxxxxx Xxxxx u. 1/E., cégjegyzékszám: 00-00-000000, a továbbiakban: „3M”) és a vele szerződést kötők („Szerződő Fél”) adásvételi jogviszonyát. 1.1 The aim of these General Terms and Conditions (“GTC”) is to regulate the sale and purchase relationships of 3M Hungária Kft. (seat: 1117 Budapest, Xxxxxxx Xxxxx u. 1/E., court xxx.xx.: 00-00-000000, hereinafter referred to as: “3M”) and certain persons concluding a contract with it (the “Contracting Party”).
Introduction. The Ministry of Defence of the Republic of Bulgaria, the Ministry of Defence of the Republic of Estonia, the Ministry of Defence of the Republic of Finland, the Government of Hungary, the Ministry of National Defence of the Republic of Lithuania, the Minister of Defence of the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Ministry of Defence of the Kingdom of Norway, the Minister of National Defence of the Republic of Poland, the Government of Romania, the Ministry of Defence of the Republic of Slovenia, the Government of the Kingdom of Sweden, and the Department of Defense of the United States of America (hereinafter referred to as the „Participants”); Considering the Memorandum of Understanding among the Ministry of Defence of the Republic of Bulgaria, the Ministry of Defence of the Republic of Estonia, the Ministry of Defence of the Republic of Finland, the Government of the Republic of Hungary, the Ministry of National Defence of the Republic of Lithuania, the Minister of Defence of the Kingdom of the Netherlands, the Ministry of Defence of the Kingdom of Norway, the Minister of National Defence of the Republic of Poland, the Government of Romania, the Ministry of Defence of the Republic of Slovenia, the Government of the Kingdom of Sweden, and the Department of Defense of the United States of America Concerning Strategic Airlift Capability, which entered into effect on September 23, 2008, as amended October 13, 2011 (hereinafter referred to as the „SAC MOU”); This Amendment Two amends and restates the SAC MOU in its entirety, and upon entry into effect of this Amendment Two to the SAC MOU, the SAC MOU will be considered to have been superseded and replaced in its entirety by this Amendment Two to the SAC MOU. Having determined that the SAC MOU should be amended and restated to reflect the will of the Participants and the organizational changes resulting from NATO Agencies Reform; In accordance with Section 30 (Amendment, Withdrawal, and Termination) of the SAC MOU, as amended; Have determined to amend the SAC MOU to read as follows: TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORD PART I: PRELIMINARY MATTERS Section 1 Introduction Section 2 Acronyms and Definitions Section 3 Objectives and Scope Section 4 Organization and Management of the SAC Program PART II: NAMP AND NAM PO ACTIVITIES Section 5 Status of Sweden and Finland in the NAMP Section 6 Organization and Management of the NATO Airlift Management Programme (NAMP) Section 7 Acquisition and Ownership Section 8 Financial Principles...
Introduction. Article 27
Introduction. The Housing Financing Fund (hereafter referred to as the HFF) is a State institution governed by public law, cf. Article 4 of the Housing Act No 44/1998 (lög um húsnæðismál). As such, it enjoys, under the general principles of Icelandic public law, a State guarantee on all its obligations without any special legal provision to that effect. The same applied to its predecessor, the State Housing Agency, and the State Building Fund and the Workers' Housing Fund operated by the Agency as well as the State Housing Board, cf. Act No 97/1993 on the State Housing Agency (lög um Húsnæðisstofnun ríkisins). On 1 January 1999, the Housing Act No 44/1998 entered into force. Under the terms of the Housing Act, the Housing Financing Fund replaced the former State Housing Agency and took over its predecessor's obli- gations. Furthermore, the State Building Fund and the Workers' Housing Fund were merged and taken over by the HFF (1).
Introduction. 23.1.1. With this contract, the parties stipulate that the service provider is the customer's data operator for the provision of the technical service, and the client (dental company) is the data controller for the provision of the dental service.
Introduction. If the transaction was carried out in accordance with the market economy investor principle, i.e. if the municipality sold the land for its market value and the conditions of the transaction would have been acceptable for a private seller, the transaction would not involve the grant of State aid. In the following the Authority will assess whether the municipality of Asker has granted illegal State aid to Asker Brygge in connection with the sale of the plot of land gbnr 32/17. The sale of land could qualify as State aid if the sale was not carried out at market price. As a point of departure, the assessment of whether a property has been sold at market value should be assessed at the time of the conclusion of the contract. The circumstances of this sale of land are somewhat particular in the sense that there exists several agreements concerning the sale: An option agreement from 2001, an extended option agreement from 2004 and a sales agreement from 2007. The option agreement not only gave Asker Brygge a right to acquire the property at any given time over the years to come but also fixed the price for a later transfer. The option thereby entailed a possibility for Asker Brygge to observe the development of property prices over a number of years, thereafter to take up the option to buy the property for the price agreed in 2001. While the Authority fully recognises the right for public authorities also to operate in a market on commercial terms, it nevertheless finds reason to consider carefully whether a similar agreement would have been concluded by a private market operator. The Authority will in that regard consider whether Asker Brygge paid for the option as such, and whether the favourable conditions for the buyer appear to be balanced by corresponding obligations for the buyer or rights for the seller. If the option agreement as such cannot be said to comply with the private market investor principle, the Authority will assess whether the property was transferred at market value when the sales agreement was concluded in 2007. Thus, the Authority will in the following firstly assess the option agreement of 2001 (and the extension signed in 2004) and, secondly, whether the actual sale of land in 2007 was accomplished at market price.
Introduction. Article 1
Introduction. The General Terms and Conditions (hereinafter referred to as “GTC”) contain the general terms and conditions of contract which form an integral part of the individual contracts concluded by Heti Világgazdaság Kiadói Zártkörűen Működő Részvénytársaság (hereinafter referred to as “HVG”) with the Exhibitors as contracting partners (hereinafter referred to as “Partner”) participating in the HVG Job Fair National Training and Career Days Event (hereinafter referred to as the “Event”), which is organised both physically and online. This includes individual contracts where the contracting partner orders only one element of the events. The conclusion of the individual contracts shall constitute acceptance of these GTC. By applying, the Partner declares that it has read and it accepts the information on the processing of personal data available on HVG’s website xxxxx://xxx.xx/xxxxxxxxxxx and accepts HVG’s General Terms and Conditions (available at: xxxxx://xxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx/xxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxxx/) and Jobline’s General Conditions (available at: xxxxx://xxxxxxx.xx/xxxxxxxxx-xxxxxxxxxx) By accepting the present GTC and by concluding the individual contracts, the Partners acknowledge that the Event will include both the Exhibition with physical presence and the virtual, i.e. online Fair, but that the two forms of presence cannot be ordered exclusively together. The Partner may decide to use only one of the two forms, but in this case it shall pay the price of one or the other of the services indicated in the price list and ordered on the Order Form.
Introduction. All real estate in Norway is identified in the real estate registry („Grunnboken”), established pursuant to the Registration Act 1935 No 2 („Lov om tinglysing”). Every property is identified by a registry identification under which information about the ownership, title and encumbrances etc. may be entered. In short, the register contains information on various rights and obligations to the property in question. Interested parties acting in good faith are entitled to rely on the information contained in the real estate registry. There is no legal obligation to register rights related to real estate (ownership etc.) in the registry. It is not necessary to register transfer of title in order to affect the transfer of ownership. The holder of the rights may however choose to register his rights in order to protect his rights against third parties. Pursuant to Section 7(1) of the Excise Tax Act 1975 No 59 („Lov om dokumentavgift”), the registration of transfer of ownership title („skjøte”) to real property releases an obligation to pay document duties („doku- mentavgift”). The tax rate is 2.5 % based on the sales value of the property. In addition, the registration of transfer of title in the real estate registry is subject to a registration fee („tinglysingsgebyr”) pursuant to the Court fee Act 1982 No 86 („Rettsgebyrloven”). This fee is currently (as of 1 January 2004) fixed at NOK 1.480,- (some EUR 180,-) (1) per document registered. The provisions concerning the conditions for levying the document duty and registration fee are identical. Hereinafter, „excise duty” will be used as the common term for document duty and registration fee. As mentioned above, the excise duty is released by the registration of the transfer of title to another legal entity. Consequently, if there is no transfer of title to another legal entity, but only a change of name of the same legal entity in the registry, no excise duty will be payable. In cases where real estate is transferred in connection with restructuring or reorganisation of companies or other legal persons, the general point of departure is that a transfer of title occurs and that registration trig- gers the levy of excise duty since the property is transferred to another legal entity. However, exemptions may follow either from the Registration Act construed in the light of the company legislation or from special legislation.