Application Review and Commenting Sample Clauses

Application Review and Commenting. 3.5.1 The Parties agree, where possible, to streamline commenting methods by using standardized wording in emails, forms, letters, conditions of approval etc. 3.5.2 When a concern and/or condition of approval is not supported by the Lead Agency, the Lead Agency shall inform the commenting agency and initiate discussions to resolve the issue.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Application Review and Commenting. ‌ The Parties agree, where possible, to streamline commenting methods by using standardized wording in emails, forms, letters, conditions of approval etc. When a concern and/or condition of approval is not supported by the Lead Agency, the Lead Agency shall inform the commenting agency and initiate discussions to resolve the issue. In the case of multiple applications for the same land, the Lead Agency shall use the greater of the timelines. Revisions to applications during the review process may result in the review period being extended depending on the complexity of the revisions and the need for revised studies. When new issues arise from the analysis of studies during application review which results in the need for additional information or study, addendums to the study may be required and additional review time may be required to review any addendums.
Sample 1

Related to Application Review and Commenting

  • AUDIT REVIEW PROCEDURES Any dispute concerning a question of fact arising under an interim or post audit of this AGREEMENT that is not disposed of by agreement, shall be reviewed by ALAMEDA CTC’s Deputy Executive Director of Finance and Administration. Not later than thirty (30) calendar days after issuance of the final audit report, CONSULTANT may request a review by ALAMEDA CTC’s Deputy Executive Director of Finance and Administration of unresolved audit issues. The request for review will be submitted in writing. Neither the pendency of a dispute nor its consideration by ALAMEDA CTC will excuse CONSULTANT from full and timely performance, in accordance with the terms of this AGREEMENT. CONSULTANT and subconsultants’ contracts, including cost proposals and ICRs, may be subject to audits or reviews such as, but not limited to, an AGREEMENT Audit, an Incurred Cost Audit, an ICR Audit, or a certified public accountant (“CPA”) ICR Audit Workpaper Review. If selected for audit or review, the AGREEMENT, cost proposal and ICR and related workpapers, if applicable, will be reviewed to verify compliance with 48 CFR, Chapter 1, Part 31 and other related laws and regulations. In the instances of a CPA ICR Audit Workpaper Review it is CONSULTANT’s responsibility to ensure federal, state, or local government officials are allowed full access to the CPA’s workpapers including making copies as necessary. The AGREEMENT, cost proposal, and ICR shall be adjusted by CONSULTANT and approved by ALAMEDA CTC to conform to the audit or review recommendations. CONSULTANT agrees that individual terms of costs identified in the audit report shall be incorporated into the contract by this reference if directed by ALAMEDA CTC at its sole discretion. Refusal by CONSULTANT to incorporate audit or review recommendations, or to ensure that the federal, state, or local governments have access to CPA workpapers, will be considered a breach of contract terms and cause for termination of the AGREEMENT and disallowance of prior reimbursed costs.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!